RefactorAssist: Agentic Refinement for Reliable Code Refactoring

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00924v1
• Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 01:32:22 GMT
• Title: RefactorAssist: Agentic Refinement for Reliable Code Refactoring
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential for automating software engineering tasks.<n>LLMs often introduce subtle errors, leading to functional behavior changes and failed unit tests.<n>We develop the RefactorAssist agent to improve the functional correctness of LLM-generateds.
• Score: 0.3657314044338856
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Code refactoring aims to enhance the internal structure of source code without affecting its functional behavior. The recent advancements of Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential for automating software engineering tasks, such as code refactoring. However, the refactorings produced by LLMs often introduce subtle errors, leading to functional behavior changes and failed unit tests, which limit their practical adoption. To address the limitations of LLM-generated refactorings, we analyze the root causes of their failures and develop the RefactorAssist agent to improve the functional correctness of LLM-generated refactorings. To this end, we use 10 open-source Java projects with their native test suites and manually evaluate why LLM-generated refactorings fail unit tests. We then design an agentic approach that leverages unit-test logs, error explanations, project context retrieval, and code diffs to guide the iterative refactoring. Our findings show that the main reasons for failure are context misunderstanding/hallucination (24.3%), incorrect or inconsistent renaming (15.3%), adding new functionality or variables (13.7%), code incompleteness (11.3%), syntax and structural errors (9.7%), edge cases not handled (9%), improper type handling (8.7%), and variables outside scope (8%). To make our approach cost-effective, RefactorAssist first applies a static repair step for missing imports, unbalanced brackets, and compilation errors without LLMs. For remaining failures, RefactorAssist incorporates error logs and code diffs, achieving up to a 70.8% repair rate on the remaining failures and a 94.2% cumulative pass rate under the best-performing configuration. These results indicate that static checks and test-guided, context-aware agentic repair can increase the reliability of LLM-generated refactorings, bringing them closer to practical integration within developer workflows.

Related papers

• LLM-as-a-Verifier: A General-Purpose Verification Framework [74.40111651545979]
  We introduce LLM-as-a-Verifier, a general-purpose verification framework.<n>It provides fine-grained feedback for agentic tasks without requiring additional training.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art performance on several benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-06T17:59:35Z)
• "Refactoring Runaway": Understanding and Mitigating Tangled Refactorings in Coding Agents for Issue Resolution [12.987766332400213]
  We analyze 3,691 valid patches generated by three agent frameworks with 12 LLMs.<n>We find that coding agents introduce tangleds less frequently than human developers.<n>We propose a refinement approach that assesses the necessity and safety of tangleds and selectively removes problematic operations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T14:18:29Z)
• Constraint-Guided Multi-Agent Decompilation for Executable Binary Recovery [47.704311990064554]
  Decompilation is essential for security analysis, malware reverse engineering, and legacy software maintenance.<n>We present a multi-agent framework that transforms decompiled code into re-executable source through Multi-level Constraint-Guided Decompilation (MCGD)<n>Our framework achieves 84-97% re-executability, improving baseline decompiler output by 28-89 percentage points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T01:28:11Z)
• SWE-Refactor: A Repository-Level Benchmark for Real-World LLM-Based Code Refactoring [20.694251041823097]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have attracted wide interest for tackling software engineering tasks.<n>Existing benchmarks commonly suffer from three shortcomings.<n>SWE-Refactor comprises 1,099 developer-written, behavior-preserving LLMs mined from 18 Java projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T16:36:29Z)
• From Human to Machine Refactoring: Assessing GPT-4's Impact on Python Class Quality and Readability [46.83143241367452]
  Refactoring aims to improve code quality without altering program behavior.<n>Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have introduced new opportunities for automated code preservation.<n>We present an empirical study on LLM-driven classes using GPT-4o, applied to 100 Python classes from the ClassEval benchmark.<n>Our findings show that GPT-4o generally produces behavior-preservings that reduce code smells and improve quality metrics, albeit at the cost of decreased readability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T15:22:37Z)
• RefAgent: A Multi-agent LLM-based Framework for Automatic Software Refactoring [8.038518812060897]
  RefAgent is a multi-agent LLM-based framework for end-to-end software.<n>It consists of specialized agents responsible for planning, executing, and iteratively refining testing.<n>It achieves a median unit test pass rate of 90%, reduces code smells by a median of 52.5%, and improves key quality attributes by a median of 8.6%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T03:20:58Z)
• Refactoring $\neq$ Bug-Inducing: Improving Defect Prediction with Code Change Tactics Analysis [54.361900378970134]
  Just-in-time defect prediction (JIT-DP) aims to predict the likelihood of code changes resulting in software defects at an early stage.<n>Prior research has largely ignored code during both the evaluation and methodology phases, despite its prevalence.<n>We propose Code chAnge Tactics (CAT) analysis to categorize code and its propagation, which improves labeling accuracy in the JIT-Defects4J dataset by 13.7%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T23:29:25Z)
• LLM-based Multi-Agent System for Intelligent Refactoring of Haskell Code [3.8442921307218882]
  We propose a large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent system to automate the process on Haskell code.<n>Results show that the proposed multi-agent system could average 11.03% decreased complexity in code, an improvement of 22.46% in overall code quality, and increase performance efficiency by an average of 13.27%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T10:17:34Z)
• D-LiFT: Improving LLM-based Decompiler Backend via Code Quality-driven Fine-tuning [49.16469288280772]
  Decompilers reconstruct human-readable source code from binaries.<n>Despite recent advances, their outputs often suffer from syntactic and semantic errors and remain difficult to read.<n>With the advent of large language models (LLMs), researchers began to explore the potential of LLMs to refine decompiler output.<n>We present D-LIFT, an enhanced decompiler-LLM pipeline with fine-tuned reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T19:09:08Z)
• MANTRA: Enhancing Automated Method-Level Refactoring with Contextual RAG and Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration [44.75848695076576]
  We introduce MANTRA, a comprehensive Large Language Models agent-based framework.<n>ManTRA integrates Context-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Generation, coordinated Multi-Agent Collaboration, and Verbal Reinforcement Learning.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that MANTRA substantially surpasses a baseline LLM model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T15:16:51Z)
• Do code refactorings influence the merge effort? [80.1936417993664]
  Multiple contributors frequently change the source code in parallel to implement new features, fix bugs, existing code, and make other changes. These simultaneous changes need to be merged into the same version of the source code. Studies show that 10 to 20 percent of all merge attempts result in conflicts, which require the manual developer's intervention to complete the process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T13:24:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.