From AI Technical Debt to Agentic Technical Debt: A Systematic Mapping of Root Causes and Manifestations in Agentic AI Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01001v1
• Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 05:09:28 GMT
• Title: From AI Technical Debt to Agentic Technical Debt: A Systematic Mapping of Root Causes and Manifestations in Agentic AI Systems
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces Agentic Technical Debt (AgTD), defined as technical debt that emerges, accumulates, propagates, and amplifies due to the autonomous and collaborative nature of Agentic AI systems.<n>We present the first systematic mapping of established AITDs to their agentic manifestations, showing how conventional debts evolve into system-level liabilities.<n>Our findings show that technical debt extends beyond software artifacts to encompass agent behaviors, coordination mechanisms, and interactions among agents, tools, and execution environments.
• Score: 11.878368077620337
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The emergence of Agentic AI systems, characterized by autonomous reasoning, multi-agent collaboration, tool orchestration, adaptive decision-making, and persistent memory, represents a fundamental shift from traditional AI pipelines to dynamic software ecosystems. While AI Technical Debt (AITD) has been widely studied in machine learning and software engineering, existing models assume static, component-level architectures and fail to capture the dynamic and emergent behaviors of agentic environments. To address this gap, this paper introduces Agentic Technical Debt (AgTD), defined as technical debt that emerges, accumulates, propagates, and amplifies due to the autonomous and collaborative nature of Agentic AI systems. Building on our prior systematic scoping review of 31 AITDs across seven root-cause categories, we employ a theory-informed transformation methodology to reinterpret these debts in Agentic AI through direct transformation, contextual transformation, and manifestation expansion. We present the first systematic mapping of established AITDs to their agentic manifestations, showing how conventional debts evolve into system-level liabilities, including memory inconsistencies, orchestration fragility, cascading failures, and unsafe autonomous decision-making. Our findings show that technical debt extends beyond software artifacts to encompass agent behaviors, coordination mechanisms, and interactions among agents, tools, and execution environments. We further examine its implications for AI Trust, Risk, and Security Management (AI TRiSM), highlighting impacts on trustworthiness, governance, security, operational resilience, and Sustainability Technical Debt. Overall, this work establishes AgTD as a foundational software engineering construct and provides a transformation framework, taxonomy, and research agenda for managing technical debt in autonomous multi-agent AI systems.

Related papers

• AI Deployment Accountability Engineering: A Vision for Accountable AI in Safety-Critical Socio-Technical Systems [14.280538199149634]
  This vision paper introduces AI Deployment Accountability Engineering (ADAE)<n>ADAE is a proposed AI engineering subdiscipline concerned with establishing measurable, continuous, and actionable accountability for deployed AI systems.<n>We articulate a research agenda built around four interconnected pillars: structured discovery of context-dependent failure modes, privacy-preserving accountability measurement, system-level risk analysis for agentic AI, and translation of technical failures into operational, and institutional risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-13T15:18:41Z)
• Networking-Aware Energy Efficiency in Agentic AI Inference: A Survey [64.20429885919701]
  We propose an energy accounting framework identifying computational and communication costs across the Perception-Reasoning-Action cycle.<n>We establish a unified taxonomy spanning model simplification, computation control, input and attention optimization, and hardware-aware inference.<n>We identify open challenges of federated green learning, carbon-aware agency, 6th generation mobile communication (6G)-native Agentic AI, and self-sustaining systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T06:13:59Z)
• The Attack and Defense Landscape of Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Survey [46.278608570660005]
  AI agents that combine large language models with non-AI system components are rapidly emerging in real-world applications.<n>This paper presents the first systematic and comprehensive survey of AI agent security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T05:25:55Z)
• Agentic AI for Cybersecurity: A Meta-Cognitive Architecture for Governable Autonomy [0.0]
  This paper argues that cybersecurity orchestration should be reconceptualized as an agentic, multi-agent cognitive system.<n>We introduce a conceptual framework in which heterogeneous AI agents responsible for detection, hypothesis formation, contextual interpretation, explanation, and governance are coordinated through an explicit meta-cognitive judgement function.<n>Our contribution is to make this cognitive structure architecturally explicit and governable by embedding meta-cognitive judgement as a first-class system function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T12:52:49Z)
• The Path Ahead for Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities [4.52683540940001]
  This chapter examines the emergence of agentic AI systems that operate autonomously in complex environments.<n>We trace the architectural progression from statistical models to transformer-based systems, identifying capabilities that enable agentic behavior.<n>Unlike existing surveys, we focus on the architectural transition from language understanding to autonomous action, emphasizing the technical gaps that must be resolved before deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T06:31:42Z)
• From Agentification to Self-Evolving Agentic AI for Wireless Networks: Concepts, Approaches, and Future Research Directions [70.72279728350763]
  Self-evolving agentic artificial intelligence (AI) offers a new paradigm for future wireless systems.<n>Unlike static AI models, self-evolving agents embed an autonomous evolution cycle that updates models, tools, and in response to environmental dynamics.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive overview of self-evolving agentic AI, highlighting its layered architecture, life cycle, and key techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T05:45:25Z)
• A Comprehensive Review of AI Agents: Transforming Possibilities in Technology and Beyond [3.96715377510494]
  Review aims to guide the next generation of AI agent systems toward more robust, adaptable, and trustworthy autonomous intelligence.<n>We synthesize insights from cognitive science-inspired models, hierarchical reinforcement learning frameworks, and large language model-based reasoning.<n>We discuss the pressing ethical, safety, and interpretability concerns associated with deploying these agents in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-16T07:38:45Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems [53.37728204835912]
  Most existing AI systems rely on manually crafted configurations that remain static after deployment.<n>Recent research has explored agent evolution techniques that aim to automatically enhance agent systems based on interaction data and environmental feedback.<n>This survey aims to provide researchers and practitioners with a systematic understanding of self-evolving AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T16:07:32Z)
• Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
  The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z)
• A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agents [45.53643260046778]
  Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have catalyzed the rise of autonomous AI agents.<n>These large-model agents mark a paradigm shift from static inference systems to interactive, memory-augmented entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T13:34:34Z)
• AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges [3.7414278978078204]
  This review critically distinguishes between AI Agents and Agentic AI, offering a structured, conceptual taxonomy, application mapping, and analysis of opportunities and challenges to clarify their divergent design philosophies and capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T16:21:33Z)
• Generative AI for Autonomous Driving: Frontiers and Opportunities [145.6465312554513]
  This survey delivers a comprehensive synthesis of the emerging role of GenAI across the autonomous driving stack.<n>We begin by distilling the principles and trade-offs of modern generative modeling, encompassing VAEs, GANs, Diffusion Models, and Large Language Models.<n>We categorize practical applications, such as synthetic data generalization, end-to-end driving strategies, high-fidelity digital twin systems, smart transportation networks, and cross-domain transfer to embodied AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T17:59:20Z)
• Agentic AI Needs a Systems Theory [46.36636351388794]
  We argue that AI development is currently overly focused on individual model capabilities.<n>We outline mechanisms for enhanced agent cognition, emergent causal reasoning ability, and metacognitive awareness.<n>We emphasize that a systems-level perspective is essential for better understanding, and purposefully shaping, agentic AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T22:51:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.