When Collaboration Becomes a Trigger: Collective Evidence-Threshold Backdoors in Multi-Agent Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01085v1
- Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 08:38:44 GMT
- Title: When Collaboration Becomes a Trigger: Collective Evidence-Threshold Backdoors in Multi-Agent Systems
- Abstract summary: Backdoor behavior can be activated when peer evidence reaches a hidden threshold, rather than being determined by any single message.<n>We introduce a collective evidence-threshold backdoor paradigm for MAS and Boundary-Conditioned Backdoor Injection (BCBI)<n>We propose LAtent Transition Test-time Evaluation (LATTE), a clean-only latent-transition defense that learns benign communication dynamics and quarantines anomalous agent updates.
- Score: 57.450132281381066
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) extend LLM capabilities through iterative communication and shared contexts. However, this collaboration introduces a vulnerability: backdoor behavior can be activated when peer evidence reaches a hidden threshold, rather than being determined by any single message. We introduce a collective evidence-threshold backdoor paradigm for MAS and Boundary-Conditioned Backdoor Injection (BCBI), which constructs counterfactual boundary pairs to separate benign behavior before the threshold from the adversarial objective after it, and learns latent progression aligned with evidence. To mitigate this threat, we propose LAtent Transition Test-time Evaluation (LATTE), a clean-only latent-transition defense that learns benign communication dynamics and quarantines anomalous agent updates before their responses propagate. Across several benchmarks, BCBI yields selective activation with little premature activation; without knowing the attack target or trigger, LATTE limits propagation with minimal disruption.
Related papers
- Governed Shared Memory for Multi-Agent LLM Systems [1.2178992475191557]
This paper formalizes the fleet-memory problem and identifies four foundational failure modes.<n>We define explicit systems-level primitives: scoped retrieval, temporal supersession, provenance tracking, and policy-governed memory propagation.<n>These primitives are implemented in MemClaw, a production multi-tenant memory service, and evaluated via ArgusFleet.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-23T13:04:14Z) - Shared Latent Structures Enable Unified Backdoor Detection and Mitigation in LLMs [20.987619302834478]
Backdoor attacks in large language models are often treated as isolated trigger-response failures.<n>We identify a shared latent mechanism that can be detected, causally controlled, and suppressed.<n>Our results suggest that many backdoors rely on a transferable latent mechanism, enabling unified detection and mitigation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-06T03:41:44Z) - A Low-Latency Fraud Detection Layer for Detecting Adversarial Interaction Patterns in LLM-Powered Agents [18.524016493711386]
Large Language Model (LLM)-powered agents demonstrate strong capabilities in autonomous task execution, tool use, and multi-step reasoning.<n> adversarial interactions can manipulate agent behavior through direct prompt injection, indirect content attacks, and multi-turn escalation strategies.<n>We propose a low-latency fraud detection layer for detecting adversarial interaction patterns in LLM-powered agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-01T22:35:59Z) - ProjLens: Unveiling the Role of Projectors in Multimodal Model Safety [54.4092272526747]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable success in cross-modal understanding and generation, yet their deployment is threatened by critical safety vulnerabilities.<n>We propose ProjLens, an interpretability framework designed to demystify MLLMs backdoors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-21T04:52:38Z) - NeuroFilter: Privacy Guardrails for Conversational LLM Agents [50.75206727081996]
This work addresses the computational challenge of enforcing privacy for agentic Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>NeuroFilter is a guardrail framework that operationalizes contextual integrity by mapping norm violations to simple directions in the model's activation space.<n>A comprehensive evaluation across over 150,000 interactions, covering models from 7B to 70B parameters, illustrates the strong performance of NeuroFilter.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-21T05:16:50Z) - Visual Backdoor Attacks on MLLM Embodied Decision Making via Contrastive Trigger Learning [89.1856483797116]
We introduce BEAT, the first framework to inject visual backdoors into MLLM-based embodied agents.<n>Unlike textual triggers, object triggers exhibit wide variation across viewpoints and lighting, making them difficult to implant reliably.<n>BEAT achieves attack success rates up to 80%, while maintaining strong benign task performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-31T16:50:49Z) - BlindGuard: Safeguarding LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems under Unknown Attacks [58.959622170433725]
BlindGuard is an unsupervised defense method that learns without requiring any attack-specific labels or prior knowledge of malicious behaviors.<n>We show that BlindGuard effectively detects diverse attack types (i.e., prompt injection, memory poisoning, and tool attack) across multi-agent systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-11T16:04:47Z) - Multi-Trigger Poisoning Amplifies Backdoor Vulnerabilities in LLMs [25.72555238658037]
We show that multiple distinct backdoor triggers can coexist within a single model without interfering with each other, enabling adversaries to embed several triggers concurrently.<n>Our findings expose a broader and more persistent vulnerability surface in Large Language Models.<n>We propose a post hoc recovery method that selectively retrains specific model components based on a layer-wise weight difference analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-15T09:04:30Z) - Probe before You Talk: Towards Black-box Defense against Backdoor Unalignment for Large Language Models [17.839413035304748]
Backdoor unalignment attacks against Large Language Models (LLMs) enable the stealthy compromise of safety alignment using a hidden trigger.<n>We introduce BEAT, a black-box defense that detects triggered samples during inference to deactivate the backdoored LLM.<n>Our method addresses the challenges of sample-dependent targets from an opposite perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-19T16:30:56Z) - Revisiting Backdoor Attacks on LLMs: A Stealthy and Practical Poisoning Framework via Harmless Inputs [54.90315421117162]
We propose a novel poisoning method via completely harmless data.<n>Inspired by the causal reasoning in auto-regressive LLMs, we aim to establish robust associations between triggers and an affirmative response prefix.<n>We observe an interesting resistance phenomenon where the LLM initially appears to agree but subsequently refuses to answer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-23T08:13:59Z) - CROW: Eliminating Backdoors from Large Language Models via Internal Consistency Regularization [7.282200564983221]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to backdoor attacks that manipulate outputs via hidden triggers.<n>We propose Internal Consistency Regularization (CROW), a defense leveraging the observation that backdoored models exhibit unstable layer-wise hidden representations when triggered.<n>CROW enforces consistency across layers via adversarial perturbations and regularization during finetuning, neutralizing backdoors without requiring clean reference models or trigger knowledge--only a small clean dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-18T07:52:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.