G-ReAct: Graph-Guided Deep Search via Structure-State Co-Evolution
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01324v1
- Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 15:43:37 GMT
- Title: G-ReAct: Graph-Guided Deep Search via Structure-State Co-Evolution
- Abstract summary: $textbfG-ReAct is a reasoning framework for deep search.<n>It organizes reasoning as $textbfstate evolution over a fixed-topology query graph.<n>G-ReAct supports both training and inference.
- Score: 16.818086150132853
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Deep search has become a fundamental capability of large language models (LLMs) for solving open-domain complex tasks. However, existing approaches typically rely on linear sequential reasoning for both trajectory generation and inference, making it difficult to consistently preserve intermediate states and constraints throughout long-horizon multi-hop search. Consequently, they often suffer from context forgetting, search drift, and inefficient exploration. To address these limitations, we propose $\textbf{G-ReAct}$, a reasoning framework for deep search that organizes reasoning as $\textbf{state evolution over a fixed-topology query graph}$. The evolving graph state explicitly tracks search progress and guides subsequent decisions, transforming exploratory search driven by textual history into graph-guided reasoning under explicit constraints. G-ReAct supports both training and inference: it generates high-quality deep-search trajectories for supervised fine-tuning and provides structured guidance for inference-time search without additional fine-tuning. Experiments demonstrate that with only 1.9K generated trajectories for fine-tuning, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 achieves $52.6\%$ accuracy on BrowseComp-ZH and $79.0\%$ on XBench, outperforming comparable open-source methods trained on substantially larger datasets, including RL-enhanced methods. Furthermore, when applied at inference time, G-ReAct consistently improves the performance of existing strong LLMs on deep-search tasks. We will publicly release all code and model weights.
Related papers
- Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Token Co-occurrence Graphs [6.058906522832935]
TIGRAG (Token-Induced GraphRAG) is an efficient graph-augmented RAG framework based on a token co-occurrence Knowledge Graph.<n>During inference, it combines graph-based semantic expansion and neural reranking to retrieve interconnected evidence for multi-hop reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-29T10:29:51Z) - Self-Improving Language Models with Bidirectional Evolutionary Search [93.21736992722835]
Bidirectional Evolutionary Search (BES) is a search framework that couples forward candidate evolution with backward goal decomposition.<n>We provide theoretical motivation showing that candidates generated by expansion-only search are confined to a narrow entropy shell while evolutionary operators can escape it.<n> Experiments show that on challenging post-training tasks where mainstream post-training algorithms fail to improve, BES enables consistent gains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-27T17:59:15Z) - CuSearch: Curriculum Rollout Sampling via Search Depth for Agentic RAG [18.557095117884472]
CuSearch is a curriculum rollout sampling framework built on Search-Depth Greedy Allocation.<n>We show that CuSearch consistently improves performance, achieving up to 11.8 exact-match points over standard GRPO on ZeroSearch.<n>These results establish per-trajectory search depth as a reliable, annotation-free proxy for retrieval supervision density in RLVR-based agentic RAG training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T06:42:17Z) - DOTRAG: Retrieval-Time Reasoning Along Paths [36.96341842051057]
We propose DotRAG, a training-free GraphRAG framework that reformulates retrieval as a reasoning process over paths.<n>Our approach generates query-conditioned constraints that guide graph exploration, prune irrelevant regions, and iteratively discover relational paths without relying on explicit step-by-step reasoning chains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-06T22:38:15Z) - Do We Still Need GraphRAG? Benchmarking RAG and GraphRAG for Agentic Search Systems [9.226583502132753]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and its graph-based extensions (GraphRAG) are effective paradigms for improving large language model (LLM) reasoning.<n>Recent agentic search systems enable dynamic, multi-round retrieval and sequential decision-making during inference.<n>We introduce RAGSearch, a unified benchmark that evaluates dense RAG and representative GraphRAG methods as retrieval infrastructures under agentic search.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-01T07:21:32Z) - HELP: HyperNode Expansion and Logical Path-Guided Evidence Localization for Accurate and Efficient GraphRAG [53.30561659838455]
Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with inherent knowledge boundaries and hallucinations.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) frequently overlooks structural interdependencies essential for multi-hop reasoning.<n>Help achieves competitive performance across multiple simple and multi-hop QA benchmarks and up to a 28.8$times$ speedup over leading Graph-based RAG baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-24T14:05:29Z) - RouteRAG: Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation from Text and Graph via Reinforcement Learning [69.87510139069218]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) integrates non-parametric knowledge into Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Recent progress has advanced text-based RAG to multi-turn reasoning through Reinforcement Learning (RL)<n>We introduce model, an RL-based framework that enables LLMs to perform multi-turn and adaptive graph-text hybrid RAG.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-10T10:05:31Z) - Search-on-Graph: Iterative Informed Navigation for Large Language Model Reasoning on Knowledge Graphs [26.0585592684229]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning abilities yet remain unreliable on knowledge-intensive, multi-hop questions.<n>We propose Search-on-Graph (SoG), a simple yet effective framework that enables LLMs to perform iterative informed graph navigation.<n>We demonstrate particularly strong gains on Wikidata benchmarks (+16% improvement over previous best methods) alongside consistent improvements on Freebase benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-09T21:20:16Z) - DeepSearch: Overcome the Bottleneck of Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards via Monte Carlo Tree Search [53.27052683356095]
We present DeepSearch, a framework that integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search directly into RLVR training.<n>In contrast to existing methods that rely on tree search only at inference, DeepSearch embeds structured search into the training loop.<n>Our contributions include: (1) a global frontier selection strategy that prioritizes promising nodes across the search tree, (2) selection with entropy-based guidance that identifies confident paths for supervision, and (3) adaptive replay buffer training with solution caching for efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T20:00:29Z) - GRIL: Knowledge Graph Retrieval-Integrated Learning with Large Language Models [59.72897499248909]
We propose a novel graph retriever trained end-to-end with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Within the extracted subgraph, structural knowledge and semantic features are encoded via soft tokens and the verbalized graph, respectively, which are infused into the LLM together.<n>Our approach consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, validating the strength of joint graph-LLM optimization for complex reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-20T02:38:00Z) - DeepDive: Advancing Deep Search Agents with Knowledge Graphs and Multi-Turn RL [60.47878242100153]
We present DeepDive to advance deep search agents.<n>We propose a strategy to automatically synthesize complex, difficult, and hard-to-find questions from open knowledge graphs.<n>We apply end-to-end multi-turn reinforcement learning to enhance LLMs' long-horizon reasoning with deep search.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-12T17:52:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.