When Retrieval Helps and Distracts: Evaluating Evidence-Generating LLMs for Biomedical Claim Verification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01409v1
• Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 17:43:28 GMT
• Title: When Retrieval Helps and Distracts: Evaluating Evidence-Generating LLMs for Biomedical Claim Verification
• Abstract summary: We study this evidence-generation setting on CARE-XAI, a unified benchmark spanning five biomedical and health fact-checking sources.<n>Bio-GRACE shows that retrieval utility is source-dependent, motivates selective retrieval, and exposes why retrieval recall and lexical evidence overlap are insufficient for biomedical fact-checking.
• Score: 0.17188280334580197
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Biomedical fact-checking systems must do more than predict whether a claim is supported, contradicted, or unaddressed: they should also produce evidence that is faithful, complete, and useful for verification. We study this evidence-generation setting on CARE-XAI, a unified benchmark spanning five biomedical and health fact-checking sources. We compare base instruction LLMs, PubMed retrieval-augmented LLMs, fine-tuned LLMs, label-only LLMs, and biomedical encoder classifiers under a shared evaluation protocol. Biomedical classifiers remain strongest for verdict-only prediction, while fine-tuned LLMs are the strongest evidence-generating systems. PubMed retrieval is mixed: it helps PubMed-aligned sources such as PubMedQA and SciFact, but can distract models on broader public-health claims. We introduce Bio-GRACE, a gold-reference-normalized diagnostic for measuring whether retrieved evidence recovers the decision benefit of reference evidence. Bio-GRACE shows that retrieval utility is source-dependent, motivates selective retrieval, and exposes why retrieval recall and lexical evidence overlap are insufficient for biomedical fact-checking.

Related papers

• PubMed Reasoner: Dynamic Reasoning-based Retrieval for Evidence-Grounded Biomedical Question Answering [12.717987334814692]
  We introduce PubMed Reasoner, a biomedical QA agent composed of three stages.<n>Self-critic query refinement evaluates MeSH terms for coverage, alignment, and redundancy to enhance PubMed queries.<n> reflective retrieval processes articles in batches until sufficient evidence is gathered.<n>Evidence-grounded response generation produces answers with explicit citations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-28T16:41:57Z)
• Multi-Sourced, Multi-Agent Evidence Retrieval for Fact-Checking [47.47518672198846]
  Misinformation spreading over the Internet poses a significant threat to both societies and individuals.<n>Previous methods rely on semantic and social-contextual patterns learned from training data.<n>We propose WKGFC, which exploits authorized open knowledge graph as a core resource of evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T19:29:01Z)
• CiteAudit: You Cited It, But Did You Read It? A Benchmark for Verifying Scientific References in the LLM Era [51.63024682584688]
  Large language models (LLMs) introduce a new risk: fabricated references that appear plausible but correspond to no real publications.<n>We present the first comprehensive benchmark and detection framework for hallucinated citations in scientific writing.<n>Our framework significantly outperforms prior methods in both accuracy and interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T19:17:39Z)
• MedRAGChecker: Claim-Level Verification for Biomedical Retrieval-Augmented Generation [8.37586466142299]
  We introduce MedRAGChecker, a claim-level verification and diagnostic framework for biomedical RAG.<n>Given a question, retrieved evidence, and a generated answer, MedRAGChecker decomposes the answer into atomic claims and estimates claim support.<n>We show that MedRAGChecker reliably flags unsupported and contradicted claims and reveals distinct risk profiles across generators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-10T10:40:42Z)
• MedTrust-RAG: Evidence Verification and Trust Alignment for Biomedical Question Answering [21.855579328680246]
  We propose MedTrust-Guided Iterative RAG, a framework designed to enhance factual consistency and hallucinations in medical QA.<n>First, it enforces citation-aware reasoning by requiring all generated content to be explicitly grounded in retrieved medical documents.<n>Second, it employs an iterative retrieval-verification process, where a verification agent assesses evidence adequacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T07:59:11Z)
• Combating Biomedical Misinformation through Multi-modal Claim Detection and Evidence-based Verification [11.555285143713315]
  CER (Combining Evidence and Reasoning) is a novel framework for biomedical fact-checking.<n>It integrates scientific evidence retrieval, reasoning via large language models, and supervised veracity prediction.<n>It effectively mitigates the risk of hallucinations, ensuring that generated outputs are grounded in verifiable, evidence-based sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T10:31:09Z)
• Enhancing LLM Generation with Knowledge Hypergraph for Evidence-Based Medicine [22.983780823136925]
  Evidence-based medicine (EBM) plays a crucial role in the application of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare.<n>We propose using LLMs to gather scattered evidence from multiple sources and present a knowledge hypergraph-based evidence management model.<n>Our approach outperforms existing RAG techniques in application domains of interest to EBM, such as medical quizzing, hallucination detection, and decision support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T09:17:31Z)
• Fact or Guesswork? Evaluating Large Language Models' Medical Knowledge with Structured One-Hop Judgments [108.55277188617035]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in various downstream task domains, but their abilities to directly recall and apply factual medical knowledge remains under-explored.<n>We introduce the Medical Knowledge Judgment dataset (MKJ), a dataset derived from the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), a comprehensive repository of standardized vocabularies and knowledge graphs.<n>Through a binary classification framework, MKJ evaluates LLMs' grasp of fundamental medical facts by having them assess the validity of concise, one-hop statements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T05:27:51Z)
• Reasoning-Enhanced Healthcare Predictions with Knowledge Graph Community Retrieval [61.70489848327436]
  KARE is a novel framework that integrates knowledge graph (KG) community-level retrieval with large language models (LLMs) reasoning.<n>Extensive experiments demonstrate that KARE outperforms leading models by up to 10.8-15.0% on MIMIC-III and 12.6-12.7% on MIMIC-IV for mortality and readmission predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T18:46:28Z)
• SeRTS: Self-Rewarding Tree Search for Biomedical Retrieval-Augmented Generation [50.26966969163348]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential in the biomedical domain with the advancement of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) Existing retrieval-augmented approaches face challenges in addressing diverse queries and documents, particularly for medical knowledge queries. We propose Self-Rewarding Tree Search (SeRTS) based on Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and a self-rewarding paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T06:48:31Z)
• Uncertainty-aware Medical Diagnostic Phrase Identification and Grounding [72.18719355481052]
  We introduce a novel task called Medical Report Grounding (MRG)<n>MRG aims to directly identify diagnostic phrases and their corresponding grounding boxes from medical reports in an end-to-end manner.<n>We propose uMedGround, a robust and reliable framework that leverages a multimodal large language model to predict diagnostic phrases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T07:41:35Z)
• Don't Ignore Dual Logic Ability of LLMs while Privatizing: A Data-Intensive Analysis in Medical Domain [19.46334739319516]
  We study how the dual logic ability of LLMs is affected during the privatization process in the medical domain. Our results indicate that incorporating general domain dual logic data into LLMs not only enhances LLMs' dual logic ability but also improves their accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-08T08:20:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.