Salami Attack: Stealthy Collusive Memory Poisoning against OpenClaw
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01637v1
- Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 03:17:26 GMT
- Title: Salami Attack: Stealthy Collusive Memory Poisoning against OpenClaw
- Abstract summary: We introduce MemCollusion, an automated framework for constructing collusive memory poisoning attacks.<n>MemCollusion constructs memory coalitions using four design constraints, five theory-informed strategies, and a fine-tuned generator.<n>MemCollusion achieves an average Memory Save Rate of 81.3% and an Attack Success Rate of 75.0%, and remains effective under both benign memory dilution and memory-level defenses.
- Score: 15.739441864484098
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Long-term memory enables LLM agents to retain useful information across sessions, but also creates an attack surface through which adversaries may poison an agent's persistent memory to steer its behavior. Existing memory poisoning attacks mainly rely on individually malicious records, overlooking a compositional threat: multiple benign-looking memories may jointly induce unsafe behavior. In this paper, we introduce MemCollusion, an automated red-teaming framework for constructing collusive memory poisoning attacks. MemCollusion applies salami tactics---a strategy that slices an adversarial objective into small, individually innocuous pieces---to generate memory fragments that are individually benign looking but collectively harmful. It constructs memory coalitions using four design constraints, five theory-informed strategies, and a fine-tuned generator. To assess collusive memory poisoning in a realistic cross-session setting, we develop MoltLab, a controlled research reproduction of Moltbook, in which crafted platform content must first be observed and distilled into persistent memory before influencing the agent's behavior in a separate session. We evaluate MemCollusion on OpenClaw using two backbone models across 48 scenarios. Under the strongest memory-saving setting, MemCollusion achieves an average Memory Save Rate of 81.3% and an Attack Success Rate of 75.0%, and remains effective under both benign memory dilution and memory-level defenses.
Related papers
- When Malicious Instructions Persist: Persistent Memory Poisoning Attack on Harness-Based Agents [17.320527773100732]
We propose PMPA, a Persistent Memory Poisoning Attack against harness-based agents.<n> PMPA embeds malicious instructions into benign external sources and induces the victim agent to write them into persistent memory.<n>Across all settings, PMPA achieves average Injection Success Rate (ISR) and Cross-session Attack Success Rate (C-ASR) of 73.7%/ 55.5% on OpenClaw and 66.9%/ 81.7% on Claude Code.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-12T11:27:53Z) - MAPLE-Guard: Memory-Aware Link Enforcement Against Memory-Link Poisoning in Multi-Agent Systems [38.58713997316864]
MAPLE-Guard is a memory-link guard for memory-enabled multi-agent systems.<n>It monitors the memory lifecycle and places gates at write, retrieval, promotion, and cross-agent reuse.<n>Results suggest that memory-aware link enforcement covers a gap left by prompt-level and topology-level defenses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-01T03:55:13Z) - When Claws Remember but Do Not Tell: Stealthy Memory Injection in Persistent Personal Agents [55.87577638514179]
We study the threat as stealth memory injection, in which a remote black-box delivers a single email payload that must induce the agent to poisoned memory.<n>We propose MemGhost, a one-shot payload generation framework.<n>Across 56 held-out test cases, MemGhost achieves 87.5% end-to-end success on OpenClaw with GPT-5.4 and 71.4% on Claude Code SDK with Sonnet 4.6.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-06T15:08:58Z) - MemVenom: Triggered Poisoning of Multimodal Memories in Web Agents [74.64265314956441]
We propose a unified black-box attack framework that poisons graph-structured external memory with coordinated text-image evidence.<n>MemVenom achieves strong end-to-end attack success with minimal impact on benign performance, reaching up to 99.15% on GPT-5-family web agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-09T11:53:25Z) - From Untrusted Input to Trusted Memory: A Systematic Study of Memory Poisoning Attacks in LLM Agents [3.3489120273076876]
Memory is a core component of AI agents, enabling them to accumulate knowledge across interactions and improve performance.<n>We present a systematic study of memory poisoning in LLM-based agents.<n>We identify four memory write channels and nine structural vulnerabilities in model capabilities, system prompt design, and agent system architecture.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-03T01:04:13Z) - Hijacking Agent Memory: Stealthy Trojan Attacks Through Conversational Interaction [3.809725488301918]
Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly leverage long term memory to support persistent and autonomous task execution.<n>Existing memory poisoning attacks assume that injected content can be stored directly in memory, overlooking the selective extraction and rewriting stages.<n>Mechanistic analysis indicates that the attack exploits embedding-space anisotropy and shifts attention patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-28T14:02:00Z) - MemGuard: Preventing Memory Contamination in Long-Term Memory-Augmented Large Language Models [56.31411457917676]
We introduce MemGuard, a type-aware memory framework that preserves functional memory boundaries during memory construction and retrieval.<n>Across hallucination and long-horizon conversation benchmarks, MemGuard improves memory reliability by up to 28.27% while retrieving up to 5.8x fewer memory tokens than prior methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-27T06:04:19Z) - Hidden in Memory: Sleeper Memory Poisoning in LLM Agents [39.7102258719441]
We study sleeper memory poisoning, a delayed attack in which an adversary manipulates external context to cause the assistant to store a fabricated memory about the user.<n>Unlike conventional prompt injection, the attack can remain dormant and re-emerge across multiple later conversations.<n>Across stateful LLM assistants, poisoned memories were added up to 99.8% on GPT-5.5 and 95% on Kimi-K2.6.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-14T19:06:10Z) - MemEvoBench: Benchmarking Memory MisEvolution in LLM Agents [78.95081012334116]
Large Language Models (LLMs) with persistent memory enhances interaction continuity and personalization but introduces new safety risks.<n> contaminated or biased memory accumulation can trigger abnormal agent behaviors.<n>MemeEvoBench is the first benchmark evaluating memory safety in LLM agents against adversarial memory injection, noisy tool outputs, and biased feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-17T07:29:52Z) - MemGen: Weaving Generative Latent Memory for Self-Evolving Agents [57.1835920227202]
We propose MemGen, a dynamic generative memory framework that equips agents with a human-esque cognitive faculty.<n>MemGen enables agents to recall and augment latent memory throughout reasoning, producing a tightly interwoven cycle of memory and cognition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T12:33:13Z) - Self-Attentive Associative Memory [69.40038844695917]
We propose to separate the storage of individual experiences (item memory) and their occurring relationships (relational memory)
We achieve competitive results with our proposed two-memory model in a diversity of machine learning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-10T03:27:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.