Wnuan: Staged Post-Training for Question Answering over Proprietary Enterprise Knowledge
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01862v1
- Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:11:33 GMT
- Title: Wnuan: Staged Post-Training for Question Answering over Proprietary Enterprise Knowledge
- Abstract summary: We present Wnuan, a three-stage pipeline that constructs task-oriented supervision from documents.<n>On the 707-question WnuanBench, the primary 32B route raises acceptable-answer rate (AAR) from 52.76% before adaptation to 80.06% after SFT and 91.51% after RL.
- Score: 7.4253318607352155
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Enterprise question answering requires models to acquire proprietary knowledge without discarding general capabilities. We present Wnuan, a three-stage pipeline that constructs task-oriented supervision from documents, performs supervised fine-tuning with general-data replay, and applies reinforcement learning to residual errors. On the 707-question WnuanBench, the primary 32B route raises acceptable-answer rate (AAR) from 52.76% before adaptation to 80.06% after SFT and 91.51% after RL. Under a matched 100-update protocol, residual-error sampling outperforms full-pool and size-matched random sampling by 3.11 and 2.97 points, respectively. Source-cluster bootstrap intervals remain above zero for both contrasts, and a same-domain validation set preserves the ordering. The general-benchmark average decreases by 5.17 points across the route, concentrated in instruction following. The automatic evaluation ensemble agrees with an authoritative domain expert on 90.5% of a stratified Wnuan-Inst response sample. These results characterize both the gains and the general-capability cost of staged enterprise adaptation.
Related papers
- Accuracy Is Not Service: A Decision-Aware Benchmark for Intermittent-Demand Forecasting [4.1751058176413105]
We benchmarked 38 forecasting methods spanning classical, intermittent-demand, machine-learning, deep-learning, and pretrained foundation models.<n>Forecast-accuracy rank and order-service rank are negatively correlated on the industrial panel, at -0.555, across methods evaluated on 20,330 real multi-item orders.<n>For intermittent demand, the lowest-error forecast need not deliver the highest service, which can be reduced without retraining.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-12T09:51:30Z) - From Production Traffic to Post-Training: Building a Self-Hosted LLM That Covers the Corporate Request Mix [55.08143827481755]
We consolidate traffic from over 200 internal applications onto a single model.<n>We train a separate GRPO expert per axis and merge them via two-stage SLERP.<n>The model absorbs 50% of platform traffic, 116M requests per month, at a fraction of the serving cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-01T17:39:26Z) - Guaranteed Adaptive Modality Acquisition: When the Policy Chooses Its Own Calibration Group [0.0]
A multimodal system may begin inference holding only some of its inputs and may acquire the rest at a cost.<n>We characterize when pattern-conditional guarantees remain valid and give two finite-sample constructions.<n>A counterexample shows that a guarantee proved for a calibration-independent grouping map need not transfer once the policy makes the terminal group calibration-dependent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-16T04:19:31Z) - Cybersecurity Detection Classification with Reasoning-enabled Language Models [50.72675435043546]
A major issue in Security Operations Centers (SOCs) is alert fatigue.<n>Prior work prompts or fine-tunes large language models (LLMs) to emit a triage label directly, but does not train them to reason about whether a detection is a genuine threat.<n>We train a chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning-enabled triage classifier on real, human-labeled Windows endpoint detections.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-30T16:22:13Z) - Where Does Agent Reliability Come From? A Cross-Benchmark Decomposition of Verification Loops, Specialist Models, and Scaffolding in a Production Enterprise Agent [0.0]
We study one production system whose architecture installs verification loops.<n>We instrument the loop end-to-end, yielding an empirical verifier confusion matrix.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-19T03:20:33Z) - Efficient Visual Pointing for Embodied AI:Agent-Driven Data Synthesis, Cross-Block Attention, and Iterative Correction [55.11480729304395]
We describe our PointArena 2026 solution, which achieves 77.2% overall accuracy and ranks second on the benchmark.<n>The ap proach targets three failure modes. First, agent-driven syn thesis builds large semantic and anchor-relative candidate pools.<n>Second, a determinis tic steerable-data pipeline creates a verified 10,000-sample main set, plus reserve samples, using masks, templates, and path verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-29T06:39:03Z) - SEVA: Self-Evolving Verification Agent with Process Reward for Fact Attribution [6.908637308550535]
SEVA is a structured verification agent that emits evidence alignments, step-by-step reasoning chains, calibrated confidence, and a six-category error diagnosis.<n>On ClearFacts, SEVA-3B matches GPT-4o-mini (69.0 vs. 69.8 F1) while producing substantially richer, auditable output.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-29T02:37:13Z) - Automated Proving of Shannon-Type Entropy Inequalities via Fine-Tuned Language Models and Guided Tree Search [50.16356451328644]
Proving Shannon-type entropy inequalities is a fundamental task in information theory.<n>We investigate whether small-scale large language models, fine-tuned on atomic proof steps, can automate this process.<n>We show that GPT-5.5 solves 1.7% samples under zero-shot prompting while Psitip solves 33.3% samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-04T05:43:12Z) - ARBOR: Online Process Rewards via a Reusable Rubric Buffer for Search Agents [48.80766702702854]
LLM-based search agents are trained predominantly with outcome-only reward, leaving the search process itself unsupervised.<n>This signal degenerates on outcome-homogeneous groups where all sampled trajectories share the same correctness, yielding zero within-group advantage and no gradient.<n>We propose ARBOR (Adaptive Buffer for Online Reward), a reusable process-reward framework that maintains a rubric memory shared across queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-02T06:58:54Z) - Compliance-Scored Best-of-N Guardrail Orchestration for Multimodal Document Generation in Payments Dispute Defense [0.0]
High-stakes enterprise document generation includes financial dispute narratives, compliance notices, and audit summaries.<n>Prior to a unified guardrail layer, production systems often stitched together separate PII redaction, content moderation, and format validation steps.<n>We present a guardrail orchestration layer for text and image inputs that couples multi-candidate generation with an explicit compliance score used for early exit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-01T00:24:30Z) - Step-wise Rubric Rewards for LLM Reasoning [72.17879367869503]
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is widely used to improve reasoning in large language models.<n>We find 18.2% of steps in correct responses are wrong yet positively rewarded.<n>Across six mathematical reasoning benchmarks, SRaR improves average accuracy over RaR by 3.57 points.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-17T07:08:14Z) - Ask Early, Ask Late, Ask Right: When Does Clarification Timing Matter for Long-Horizon Agents? [0.7199239000118145]
We introduce a forced-injection framework that provides ground-truth clarifications at controlled points in the agent's trajectory.<n>We find that the value of clarification depends sharply on what information is missing.<n>A complementary study of 300 unscripted sessions reveals that no current frontier model asks within the empirically optimal window.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-08T16:08:03Z) - TEMPO: Scaling Test-time Training for Large Reasoning Models [87.61789183311856]
Test-time training (TTT) adapts model parameters on unlabeled test instances during inference time.<n>We propose TEMPO, a TTT framework that interleaves policy refinement on unlabeled questions with periodic critic recalibration on a labeled dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-21T10:01:04Z) - VAULT: Vigilant Adversarial Updates via LLM-Driven Retrieval-Augmented Generation for NLI [15.320553375828045]
VAULT is a fully automated adversarial RAG pipeline that uncovers and remedies weaknesses in NLI models.<n>VAULT consistently outperforms prior in-context adversarial methods by up to 2.0% across datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-01T14:22:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.