KC-Agent: A Dual-Process Cognitive Architecture for Efficient ML Model Improvement
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02351v1
- Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:03:35 GMT
- Title: KC-Agent: A Dual-Process Cognitive Architecture for Efficient ML Model Improvement
- Abstract summary: Data drift poses significant challenges for machine learning systems in production.<n>We present KC-Agent, a dual-process cognitive architecture for automated ML model improvement.<n>We evaluate our method on five datasets including real-world NASA turbofan data.
- Score: 2.716039597401137
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Data drift poses significant challenges for machine learning systems in production, requiring continuous model updates to maintain performance. We present KC-Agent, a dual-process cognitive architecture for automated ML model improvement that combines fast pattern recognition (System 1) with deliberate incremental updates (System 2). Our approach implements structured memory systems enabling System 1 to leverage successful solutions previously discovered by System 2, achieving efficient pattern-based responses without costly re-computation. KC-Agent incorporates atomic change principles and rollback capabilities to ensure reliable, verifiable updates in production environments. We evaluate our method on five datasets including real-world NASA turbofan data with authentic temporal degradation and synthetic datasets with controlled drift scenarios. KC-Agent achieves state-of-the-art performance (76.8% accuracy) while maintaining optimal efficiency (13.2s execution time), outperforming established cognitive architectures: CodeAct (+2.4%), Tree of Thoughts (+3.6%), ReAct (+8.0%), and Reflexion (+8.9%). Consensus evaluation by a panel of state-of-the-art LLMs confirms superior strategic efficacy (8.33/10 Smartness score), significantly outperforming baseline agents. The knowledge consolidation mechanism delivers 91% speedup over the slow variant while maintaining higher accuracy. Our approach demonstrates both theoretical foundations and practical viability for cognitive-inspired automated ML improvement systems capable of handling complex real-world data drift scenarios.
Related papers
- FSFM: A Biologically-Inspired Framework for Selective Forgetting of Agent Memory [11.729108742234416]
In resource-constrained environments, a well-designed forgetting mechanism is as crucial as remembering, delivering benefits across three dimensions.<n>Our framework establishes a taxonomy of forgetting mechanisms: passive decay-based, active deletion-based, safety-triggered, and adaptive reinforcement-based.<n>Results show significant improvements: access efficiency (+8.49%), content quality (+29.2% signal-to-noise ratio), and security performance (100% elimination of security risks)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-22T07:55:22Z) - ROAD: Reflective Optimization via Automated Debugging for Zero-Shot Agent Alignment [1.6968020497268546]
ROAD is a novel framework that treats optimization as a dynamic debug investigation rather than a search.<n>Road is highly sample-efficient, achieving a 5.6 percent increase in success rate and a 3.8 percent increase in search accuracy.<n>These findings suggest that mimicking the human engineering loop of failure analysis and patching offers a viable, data-efficient alternative to resource-intensive training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-30T07:31:34Z) - AgentMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Tool-Augmented Agent [80.83250816918861]
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) like o3 and DeepSeek-R1 have achieved remarkable progress in natural language reasoning with long chain-of-thought.<n>However, they remain computationally inefficient and struggle with accuracy when solving problems requiring complex mathematical operations.<n>We present AgentMath, an agent framework that seamlessly integrates language models' reasoning capabilities with code interpreters' computational precision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-23T19:57:49Z) - CUARewardBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Reward Models on Computer-using Agent [46.41047559759938]
Computer-using agents (CUAs) enable task completion through natural interaction with operating systems and software interfaces.<n> Reward models offer promising alternatives, but their effectiveness on CUA evaluation remains largely underexplored.<n>We present CUARewardBench, comprising four key contributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T12:53:40Z) - Demystifying Reinforcement Learning in Agentic Reasoning [90.3737088727791]
We conduct a comprehensive and systematic investigation to demystify reinforcement learning in agentic reasoning.<n>We highlight our key insights: (i) replacing stitched synthetic trajectories with real end-to-end tool-use trajectories yields a far stronger SFT.<n> Exploration-friendly techniques are crucial for agentic RL, such as clip higher, overlong reward shaping, and maintaining adequate policy entropy could improve the training efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T17:57:15Z) - MARS: Optimizing Dual-System Deep Research via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [82.14973479594367]
Large Language Models (LLMs) for complex reasoning tasks require innovative approaches that bridge intuitive and deliberate cognitive processes.<n>This paper introduces a Multi-Agent System for Deep ReSearch (MARS) enabling seamless integration of System 1's fast, intuitive thinking with System 2's deliberate reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T15:42:55Z) - Automatic Failure Attribution and Critical Step Prediction Method for Multi-Agent Systems Based on Causal Inference [8.823529310904162]
Multi-agent systems (MAS) are critical for automating complex tasks, yet their practical deployment is hampered by the challenge of failure attribution.<n>We introduce the first failure attribution framework for MAS grounded in multi-granularity causal inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-10T15:22:00Z) - Resource-Efficient Automatic Software Vulnerability Assessment via Knowledge Distillation and Particle Swarm Optimization [8.132644507041922]
We propose a novel resource-efficient framework that integrates knowledge distillation and particle swarm optimization to enable automated vulnerability assessment.<n>Our framework employs a two-stage approach: First, particle swarm optimization is utilized to optimize the architecture of a compact student model.<n>Second, knowledge distillation is applied to transfer critical vulnerability assessment knowledge from a large teacher model to the optimized student model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-30T13:55:28Z) - AutoMind: Adaptive Knowledgeable Agent for Automated Data Science [70.33796196103499]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown great potential in addressing real-world data science problems.<n>Existing frameworks depend on rigid, pre-defined and inflexible coding strategies.<n>We introduce AutoMind, an adaptive, knowledgeable LLM-agent framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-12T17:59:32Z) - EfficientLLM: Efficiency in Large Language Models [64.3537131208038]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have driven significant progress, yet their growing counts and context windows incur prohibitive compute, energy, and monetary costs.<n>We introduce EfficientLLM, a novel benchmark and the first comprehensive empirical study evaluating efficiency techniques for LLMs at scale.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-20T02:27:08Z) - RA-DIT: Retrieval-Augmented Dual Instruction Tuning [90.98423540361946]
Retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) improve performance by accessing long-tail and up-to-date knowledge from external data stores.
Existing approaches require either expensive retrieval-specific modifications to LM pre-training or use post-hoc integration of the data store that leads to suboptimal performance.
We introduce Retrieval-Augmented Dual Instruction Tuning (RA-DIT), a lightweight fine-tuning methodology that provides a third option.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T17:16:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.