ScrambleToolBench: Agents Search Exhaustively Even When Their Own Map Points to the Next Step

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02358v1
• Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:07:46 GMT
• Title: ScrambleToolBench: Agents Search Exhaustively Even When Their Own Map Points to the Next Step
• Abstract summary: We introduce ScrambleToolBench, an interactive terminal benchmark designed to isolate behavioral reasoning.<n>The benchmark requires agents to uncover hidden tool behaviors entirely through trial-and-error interaction.<n>Our evaluation of state-of-the-art language models reveals that successful initial discovery does not translate into robust adaptation.
• Score: 74.83535434786145
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: To operate robustly in open-world environments, autonomous agents should be able to infer the behavior of unfamiliar systems through interaction alone, even in the absence of documentation. However, existing tool-use benchmarks expose semantic tool schemas in static environments, allowing agents to rely on prior knowledge rather than autonomous discovery. To address this limitation, we introduce ScrambleToolBench, an interactive terminal benchmark designed to isolate behavioral reasoning. By removing semantic cues and enforcing a continuous task curriculum, the benchmark requires agents to uncover hidden tool behaviors entirely through trial-and-error interaction. The benchmark further introduces dynamic challenges, including mapping drift, stochastic action failures, and temporal execution windows, to evaluate whether agents can revise and adapt their hypotheses as the environment changes. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art language models reveals that successful initial discovery does not translate into robust adaptation. When faced with structural changes such as mapping drift, agents fail to use deductive strategies such as cycle tracing, and instead exhibit belief inertia or fall back to exhaustive search. Increasing test-time reasoning only amplifies this expensive brute-force search rather than enabling deductive recovery. While equipping agents with persistent memory reduces compounding errors, they remain unable to efficiently infer structural changes, highlighting a gap in current agent reasoning.

Related papers

• Are Android GUI Agents Robust Against Runtime Anomalies? AnTrap: Evaluating Agents in Dynamic Adversarial Environments [19.009627117174947]
  We introduce AnTrap, a comprehensive benchmark that injects dynamic perturbations into agent execution trajectories.<n>We propose a taxonomy organizing real-world anomalies into four layers (State, Thinking, Action and Round) with ten fine-grained subcategories.<n>We also develop a construction pipeline that preserves task solvability while introducing realistic adversarial conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T05:57:25Z)
• From Profiling to Synthesis: Benchmarking Implicit Behavioral Alignment in Personalized LLM Agents [56.187590188698955]
  Large Language Models have enabled increasingly capable autonomous agents, yet personalization remains critical for making such agents practically useful.<n>Recent benchmarks have begun evaluating personalization in agents, but they largely rely on static preference snapshots, fixed interaction logs, or question answering over predefined user profiles.<n>We introduce IBA-Bench, a benchmark for implicit behavioral alignment constructed from longitudinal interaction histories.<n>We propose IBA-Agent, an agent framework that reconciles conflicting priorities through broad retrieval and trajectory-level alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T12:52:04Z)
• Verified Tool Calls Improve LLM Agent Reliability Under Non-Atomic Failures [0.0]
  Real-world systems exhibit non-atomic behaviors such as timeouts after dispatch, delayed visibility, and partial state updates.<n>These mismatches lead to reliability issues including duplicate actions, task success, and unnecessary tool executions.<n>A lightweight, verification-aware tool wrapper is introduced that augments tool calls with postcondition verification, verify-before-retry logic, and idempotency keys.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T16:16:14Z)
• DocOS: Towards Proactive Document-Guided Actions in GUI Agents [54.27655693145045]
  textbfDocOS is a benchmark designed to assess document-guided problem solving in fully interactive environments.<n>Experiments reveal that agents struggle to reliably locate relevant information during proactive search and frequently fail to faithfully ground retrieved instructions into precise actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T08:36:04Z)
• Dynamic analysis enhances issue resolution [53.50448142467294]
  DAIRA (Dynamic Analysis-enhanced Issue Resolution Agent) is an automated repair framework that embeds dynamic analysis into the agent's reasoning cycle.<n> Driven by a Test Tracing-Driven methodology, DAIRA utilizes lightweight monitors to extract critical runtime data.<n>When powered by Gemini 3 Flash Preview, DAIRA establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, achieving a 79.4% resolution rate on the SWE-bench Verified dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T14:48:54Z)
• AgentProcessBench: Diagnosing Step-Level Process Quality in Tool-Using Agents [50.481033105867205]
  We introduce AgentProcessBench, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating step-level effectiveness in realistic, tool-augmented trajectories.<n>The benchmark comprises 1,000 diverse trajectories and 8,509 human-labeled step annotations with 89.1% inter-annotator agreement.<n>It features a ternary labeling scheme to capture exploration and an error propagation rule to reduce labeling ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-15T16:13:58Z)
• AutoAgent: Evolving Cognition and Elastic Memory Orchestration for Adaptive Agents [26.380991138110925]
  AutoAgent is a self-evolving multi-agent framework built on evolving cognition, on-the-fly contextual decision-making, and elastic memory orchestration.<n>Each agent maintains structured prompt-level cognition over tools, self-capabilities, peer expertise, and task knowledge.<n>AutoAgent consistently improves task success, tool-use efficiency, and collaborative robustness over static and memory-augmented baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-10T14:23:49Z)
• The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution [63.61358761489141]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are widely used in real-world applications such as customer service, web navigation, and software engineering.<n>We propose a novel framework for textbfgeneral agentic attribution, designed to identify the internal factors driving agent actions regardless of the task outcome.<n>We validate our framework across a diverse suite of agentic scenarios, including standard tool use and subtle reliability risks like memory-induced bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T15:22:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.