Fast and Accurate Quotation Attribution in Literary Texts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02359v1
• Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:08:06 GMT
• Title: Fast and Accurate Quotation Attribution in Literary Texts
• Abstract summary: We propose an efficient formulation that resolves multiple quotation attributions within a shared, large context window.<n>Using our new formulation, textitjoint scoring, we report state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on the Project Dialogism Novel Corpus (PDNC)<n>Our best model reaches 94.5% overall attribution accuracy while processing novels $20times$ faster than comparable standard methods.
• Score: 6.7579958635569755
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Attributing quotations to their speakers in literary texts remains an open challenge. Standard methods, which independently predict a speaker mention for each quotation, are efficient but still limited in accuracy. In contrast, large language model (LLM) approaches achieve strong performance, but their computational cost limits their use in large-scale literary analysis. We propose an encoder-based efficient formulation that resolves multiple quotation attributions within a shared, large context window. Using our new formulation, \textit{joint scoring}, we report state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on the Project Dialogism Novel Corpus (PDNC), comprising more than 35,000 manually annotated quotations from 22 English novels. Our best model reaches 94.5\% overall attribution accuracy while processing novels $20\times$ faster than comparable standard methods and more than $1000\times$ faster than LLM-based approaches on an A100 GPU. An analysis of models' representations suggests that joint scoring improves on challenging attribution examples by preserving long-range anaphora resolution signal, an information that we found already present in pretrained encoders. To facilitate adoption, we release ModernBookNLP, a modified fork of BookNLP that replaces its quotation attribution model with our best system available at https://github.com/gasmichel/ModernBookNLP_QA/.

Related papers

• Hierarchical Policy Optimization for Simultaneous Translation of Unbounded Speech [50.45710815530982]
  Simultaneous speech translation (SST) generates translations while receiving partial speech input.<n>Recent advances show that large language models (LLMs) can substantially improve SST quality, but at the cost of high computational overhead.<n>We propose a Hierarchical Policy Optimization (HPO) approach that trains post-train models on imperfect SFT data.<n> Experiments on English to Chinese/German/Japanese demonstrate improvements of over +7 COMET score and +1.25 MetricX score at a latency of 1.5 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-22T19:43:51Z)
• Automatic Detection of Complex Quotation Patterns in Aggadic Literature [0.9476463361600828]
  We present ACT, a novel three-stage algorithm for automatic detection of biblical quotations in Rabbinic literature.<n>Our approach was evaluated against leading systems, including Dicta, Passim, Text-Matcher, as well as human-annotated critical editions.<n>In addition to improving quotation detection, ACT's ability to classify stylistic patterns across corpora opens new avenues for genre classification and intertextual analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T14:45:58Z)
• Discourse Features Enhance Detection of Document-Level Machine-Generated Content [53.41994768824785]
  Machine-generated content poses challenges such as academic plagiarism and the spread of misinformation.<n>Existing MGC detectors often focus solely on surface-level information, overlooking implicit and structural features.<n>We introduce novel methodologies and datasets to overcome these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T08:47:41Z)
• A Bayesian Approach to Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Authorship Attribution [57.309390098903]
  Authorship attribution aims to identify the origin or author of a document. Large Language Models (LLMs) with their deep reasoning capabilities and ability to maintain long-range textual associations offer a promising alternative. Our results on the IMDb and blog datasets show an impressive 85% accuracy in one-shot authorship classification across ten authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T04:14:23Z)
• Localizing Factual Inconsistencies in Attributable Text Generation [74.11403803488643]
  We introduce QASemConsistency, a new formalism for localizing factual inconsistencies in attributable text generation.<n>We show that QASemConsistency yields factual consistency scores that correlate well with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T22:53:48Z)
• A Probability--Quality Trade-off in Aligned Language Models and its Relation to Sampling Adaptors [50.046717886067555]
  We show that when sampling corpora from an aligned language model, there exists a trade-off between the strings' average reward and average log-likelihood. We provide a formal treatment of this phenomenon and demonstrate how a choice of sampling adaptor allows for a selection of how much likelihood we exchange for the reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T17:38:21Z)
• Retrieval is Accurate Generation [99.24267226311157]
  We introduce a novel method that selects context-aware phrases from a collection of supporting documents. Our model achieves the best performance and the lowest latency among several retrieval-augmented baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T14:16:19Z)
• Fast and Accurate Factual Inconsistency Detection Over Long Documents [19.86348214462828]
  We introduce SCALE, a task-agnostic model for detecting factual inconsistencies using a novel chunking strategy. This approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in factual inconsistency detection for diverse tasks and long inputs. We have released our code and data publicly to GitHub.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T22:55:39Z)
• Improving Automatic Quotation Attribution in Literary Novels [21.164701493247794]
  Current models for quotation attribution in literary novels assume varying levels of available information in their training and test data. We benchmark state-of-the-art models on each of these sub-tasks independently, using a large dataset of annotated coreferences and quotations in literary novels. We also train and evaluate models for the speaker attribution task in particular, showing that a simple sequential prediction model achieves accuracy scores on par with state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-07T17:37:01Z)
• Beyond Black Box AI-Generated Plagiarism Detection: From Sentence to Document Level [4.250876580245865]
  Existing AI-generated text classifiers have limited accuracy and often produce false positives. We propose a novel approach using natural language processing (NLP) techniques. We generate multiple paraphrased versions of a given question and inputting them into the large language model to generate answers. By using a contrastive loss function based on cosine similarity, we match generated sentences with those from the student's response.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T20:34:55Z)
• Efficient and Flexible Topic Modeling using Pretrained Embeddings and Bag of Sentences [1.8592384822257952]
  We propose a novel topic modeling and inference algorithm. We leverage pre-trained sentence embeddings by combining generative process models and clustering. TheTailor evaluation shows that our method yields state-of-the art results with relatively little computational demands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T20:13:11Z)
• Ensemble Transfer Learning for Multilingual Coreference Resolution [60.409789753164944]
  A problem that frequently occurs when working with a non-English language is the scarcity of annotated training data. We design a simple but effective ensemble-based framework that combines various transfer learning techniques. We also propose a low-cost TL method that bootstraps coreference resolution models by utilizing Wikipedia anchor texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-22T18:22:55Z)
• Deep Continuous Prompt for Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings [8.70715711885114]
  We present a novel method which freezes the whole language model and only optimize the prefix deep continuous prompts. It not only tunes around 0.1% parameters of the original language model, but avoids the cumbersome computation of searching handcrafted prompts. Our proposed DCPCSE outperforms the state-of-the-art method SimCSE by a large margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T06:07:44Z)
• Few-shot Instruction Prompts for Pretrained Language Models to Detect Social Biases [55.45617404586874]
  We propose a few-shot instruction-based method for prompting pre-trained language models (LMs) We show that large LMs can detect different types of fine-grained biases with similar and sometimes superior accuracy to fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-15T04:19:52Z)
• Context-Based Quotation Recommendation [60.93257124507105]
  We propose a novel context-aware quote recommendation system. It generates a ranked list of quotable paragraphs and spans of tokens from a given source document. We conduct experiments on a collection of speech transcripts and associated news articles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-17T17:49:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.