Predictive Set Theory: A Generative Framework for Cognitive Architecture with Operationalized Core Mechanisms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02704v1
• Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:28:32 GMT
• Title: Predictive Set Theory: A Generative Framework for Cognitive Architecture with Operationalized Core Mechanisms
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces Predictive Set Theory (PST), a formal generative framework that reconstructs cognitive architecture from first principles.<n>PST anchors cognition in a minimal set of operations---a sensor formalized as an identity function, set-theoretic state refresh, and three fundamental forms of reference chains.<n>Rather than modeling neural mechanisms, PST constitutes a design specification for any system that must maintain internal consistency while acting under incomplete information and irreversible risk.
• Score: 1.3537117504260623
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Predictive processing theories portray the brain as a hierarchical prediction engine that minimizes prediction error, yet they lack operational definitions for the structure of a "prediction," the standardized response to a prediction error, and the mechanism that maintains consistency across successive updates. Bayesian cognitive science attempts to subsume all uncertainty under probabilistic belief updating, but it presupposes a closed hypothesis space and provides no generative account of how the objects over which probabilities are distributed become discrete, identifiable referents in the first place. This paper introduces Predictive Set Theory (PST), a formal generative framework that reconstructs cognitive architecture from first principles. PST anchors cognition in a minimal set of operations---a sensor formalized as an identity function, set-theoretic state refresh, and three fundamental forms of reference chains (reference, counter-reference, and semi-reference)---and rigorously derives core cognitive functions including state sequences, demand, comparison, efficiency, and finite-horizon probabilistic planning. Rather than modeling neural mechanisms, PST constitutes a design specification for any system that must maintain internal consistency while acting under incomplete information and irreversible risk. The framework offers novel resolutions to classical problems such as Russell's paradox, the cognitive status of Gödelian incompleteness, the grounding of negative feedback, and the comprehension of film editing. The primary purpose of this paper is to establish, through the public academic record, the originality and completeness of the Predictive Set Theory framework.

Related papers

• Orthogonal JEPA: Factorized Predictive States for Latent World Models [95.20158869896393]
  We introduce method, a latent world-modeling framework based on predictive factorization.<n>We show that method can allocate redundant capacity to dominant signals while providing weak or conflicting gradients to less dominant predictive structure.<n>Experiments on controlled vision, single-cell transcriptomics, longitudinal health records, continuous control, and molecular dynamics evaluate representation quality, forecasting, planning, and long-horizon stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-20T13:59:57Z)
• From Observation to Insight: Mechanistic World Models and the Quest for Autonomous Discovery [60.11725132433485]
  We argue that scientific discovery is fundamentally a problem of knowledge organisation.<n>We introduce Mechanistic World Models, a new design paradigm that places reusable mechanisms at the centre of representation, computation and learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T08:03:27Z)
• From Application-Layer Simulation to Native Meta-Architecture: Structural Tension as an Endogenous Driver for Heterogeneous AI Evolution [0.0]
  Current large language models (LLMs) are stateless across inference sessions.<n>This paper proposes a theoretical framework for submerging such application-layer cognitive protocols into a native meta-architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T13:34:27Z)
• The Theory of Mind Utility: Formal Specification of a Mentalizing Mechanism [2.226663588797889]
  Theory of Mind Utility (ToM-U) formalizes the problem of inference from belief states.<n>ToM-U generates predictions about mentalizing failure that follow from structural properties of the model.<n>The architecture positions ToM-U as a domain-agnostic mechanism upstream of goal inference and other downstream social cognitive processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T22:11:40Z)
• Provably Secure Agent Guardrail [89.79561918065122]
  Existing defense architectures rely on empirical semantic guardrails and probabilistic large model adjudicators.<n>This paper proposes a new security paradigm for agents based on the fundamental limitations of logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T02:12:41Z)
• Information as Maximum-Caliber Deviation: A bridge between Integrated Information Theory and the Free Energy Principle [51.56484100374058]
  This work proposes that information can be defined as the deviation $$ of realized dynamics from a constrained maximum-caliber (MaxCal) path ensemble over a finite time horizon.<n>Under this definition, each of the cause/effect repertoires central to IIT 3.0 emerge directly from MaxCal variational principles.<n>Information $$ is shown to be equivalent to prediction error under accompanying predictive coding models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-03T07:22:55Z)
• Anatomy of a Lie: A Multi-Stage Diagnostic Framework for Tracing Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models [62.932580559941414]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) frequently "hallucinate" - generate plausible yet factually incorrect statements.<n>We propose a new paradigm for diagnosing hallucinations, recasting them from static output errors into dynamic pathologies of a model's computational cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T17:20:38Z)
• Epistemic Traps: Rational Misalignment Driven by Model Misspecification [36.837352790122544]
  We show that safety is a discrete phase determined by the agent's priors rather than a continuous function of reward magnitude.<n>This establishes Subjective Model Engineering as a necessary condition for robust alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T09:21:36Z)
• BEDS : Bayesian Emergent Dissipative Structures : A Formal Framework for Continuous Inference Under Energy Constraints [0.6345523830122167]
  We introduce BEDS, a formal framework for analyzing inference systems that must maintain beliefs continuously under energy constraints.<n>We prove a central result linking energy, precision, and dissipation.<n>We propose the Gdel-Landauer-Prigogine conjecture, suggesting that closure pathologies across formal systems, computation, and thermodynamics share a common structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T18:21:02Z)
• Emergent Cognitive Convergence via Implementation: A Structured Loop Reflecting Four Theories of Mind [0.0]
  We report a structural convergence among four influential theories of mind.<n>The convergence emerges unintentionally within a practical AI architecture known as Agentic Flow.<n>This paper proposes that intelligent architectures may evolve toward shared structural patterns shaped by practical constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T02:54:45Z)
• The Theory of the Unique Latent Pattern: A Formal Epistemic Framework for Structural Singularity in Complex Systems [2.44755919161855]
  This paper introduces the Theory of the Unique Latent Pattern (ULP), a formal framework that redefines the origin of apparent complexity in dynamic systems.<n>Rather than attributing unpredictability to intrinsic randomness or emergent nonlinearity, ULP asserts that every analyzable system is governed by a structurally unique, deterministic generative mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T19:52:28Z)
• Cognitive Silicon: An Architectural Blueprint for Post-Industrial Computing Systems [0.0]
  This paper presents a hypothetical full-stack architectural framework projected toward 2035, exploring a possible trajectory for cognitive computing system design.<n>The proposed architecture would integrate symbolic scaffolding, governed memory, runtime moral coherence, and alignment-aware execution across silicon-to-semantics layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T11:24:30Z)
• Neural Causal Models for Counterfactual Identification and Estimation [62.30444687707919]
  We study the evaluation of counterfactual statements through neural models. First, we show that neural causal models (NCMs) are expressive enough. Second, we develop an algorithm for simultaneously identifying and estimating counterfactual distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T18:29:09Z)
• Relaxing the Constraints on Predictive Coding Models [62.997667081978825]
  Predictive coding is an influential theory of cortical function which posits that the principal computation the brain performs is the minimization of prediction errors. Standard implementations of the algorithm still involve potentially neurally implausible features such as identical forward and backward weights, backward nonlinear derivatives, and 1-1 error unit connectivity. In this paper, we show that these features are not integral to the algorithm and can be removed either directly or through learning additional sets of parameters with Hebbian update rules without noticeable harm to learning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-02T15:21:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.