Conformal risk control for model-form uncertainty in parametric non-intrusive reduced-order models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03360v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 09:08:16 GMT
• Title: Conformal risk control for model-form uncertainty in parametric non-intrusive reduced-order models
• Abstract summary: Non-intrusive reduced-order models (NIROMs) have become a standard tool for approximating parametric partial differential equations from computer design of experiments.<n>However, assessing the reliability of their predictions remains a major challenge, particularly in extrapolation regimes or under limited training data.<n>We introduce a framework for quantifying model-form uncertainty in NIROMs by combining a perturbative representation of reduced bases with distribution-free conformal-type methods.
• Score: 1.5749416770494706
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Non-intrusive reduced-order models (NIROMs) have become a standard tool for approximating parametric partial differential equations from computer design of experiments while significantly reducing computational costs. However, assessing the reliability of their predictions remains a major challenge, particularly in extrapolation regimes or under limited training data. In this work, we introduce a framework for quantifying model-form uncertainty in NIROMs by combining a perturbative stochastic representation of reduced bases with distribution-free conformal-type methods. Starting from a deterministic reduced basis constructed from snapshot matrices, we model uncertainty through random perturbations defined on the Stiefel manifold, directed along the discarded modes, yielding stochastic reduced-order approximations whose induced variance reflects the basis-truncation error. A transport approximation gives a closed-form posterior variance that sepa- rates basis-induced from regression-induced uncertainty, without re-training the underlying Gaussian processes. We include this posterior variance within a conformal risk control calibration framework, that provides prediction sets with coordinate miscoverage guarantees. The calibration factor produced by this framework is itself an interpretable, scalar diagnostic of the quality of the uncertainty estimate. The methodology is evaluated on parametric PDE benchmarks and an industrial tire-manufacturing calendering process. Numerical experiments demonstrate reliable, locally informative uncertainty quantification that goes beyond the Gaussian predictive variance.

Related papers

• Error Aware Distribution Prediction for Lightweight Implicit Neural Representations [7.945055464912347]
  Implicit neural representations (INRs) offer compact encoding of volumes, but as lossy approximators, inevitably have prediction errors.<n>We consider INRs that can simultaneously encode relative error scales by predicting distributions using tools from uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-11T01:45:01Z)
• Non-Parametric Rehearsal Learning via Conditional Mean Embeddings [88.89267783967263]
  We propose a non-parametric rehearsal learning approach for textitavoiding undesired future (AUF) problems.<n>Specifically, we use kernel machinery to reformulate the AUF objective into a unified representation that disentangles desirability modeling from action-induced distributional changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T15:30:52Z)
• Accurate and Reliable Uncertainty Estimates for Deterministic Predictions Extensions to Under and Overpredictions [0.5702909326640887]
  We extend the ACCurate and Reliable Uncertainty Estimate (ACCRUE) framework to learn input-dependent, non-Gaussian uncertainty distributions.<n>We show that the proposed approach captures an input-dependent uncertainty structure and improves probabilistic forecasts relative to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T20:39:46Z)
• Nonparametric Distribution Regression Re-calibration [3.0204520109309847]
  Minimizing overall prediction error encourages models to prioritize informativeness over calibration.<n>In safety-critical settings, trustworthy uncertainty estimates are often more valuable than narrow intervals.<n>We propose a novel non-parametric re-calibration algorithm based on conditional kernel mean embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T11:48:43Z)
• Variationally correct operator learning: Reduced basis neural operator with a posteriori error estimation [3.8135482236014133]
  Minimizing PDE-residual losses is a common strategy to promote physical consistency in neural operators.<n>This work develops a variationally correct operator learning framework by constructing first-order system least-squares (FOSLS) objectives.<n>We provide a rigorous convergence analysis that bounds the total error by the sum of finite element discretization bias, reduced basis truncation error, neural network approximation error, and statistical estimation errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T18:37:59Z)
• Generalized Gaussian Temporal Difference Error for Uncertainty-aware Reinforcement Learning [0.19418036471925312]
  We introduce a novel framework for generalized Gaussian error modeling in deep reinforcement learning.<n>We improve the estimation and mitigation of data-dependent aleatoric uncertainty.<n> Experiments with policy gradient algorithms demonstrate significant performance gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T08:12:25Z)
• Selective Nonparametric Regression via Testing [54.20569354303575]
  We develop an abstention procedure via testing the hypothesis on the value of the conditional variance at a given point. Unlike existing methods, the proposed one allows to account not only for the value of the variance itself but also for the uncertainty of the corresponding variance predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T13:04:11Z)
• Sharp Calibrated Gaussian Processes [58.94710279601622]
  State-of-the-art approaches for designing calibrated models rely on inflating the Gaussian process posterior variance. We present a calibration approach that generates predictive quantiles using a computation inspired by the vanilla Gaussian process posterior variance. Our approach is shown to yield a calibrated model under reasonable assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T12:17:36Z)
• The Implicit Delta Method [61.36121543728134]
  In this paper, we propose an alternative, the implicit delta method, which works by infinitesimally regularizing the training loss of uncertainty. We show that the change in the evaluation due to regularization is consistent for the variance of the evaluation estimator, even when the infinitesimal change is approximated by a finite difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T19:34:17Z)
• Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation of Learned Variational MRI Reconstruction [63.202627467245584]
  We introduce a Bayesian variational framework to quantify the model-immanent (epistemic) uncertainty. We demonstrate that our approach yields competitive results for undersampled MRI reconstruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T18:08:14Z)
• Learning to Predict Error for MRI Reconstruction [67.76632988696943]
  We demonstrate that predictive uncertainty estimated by the current methods does not highly correlate with prediction error. We propose a novel method that estimates the target labels and magnitude of the prediction error in two steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T15:55:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.