Balancing Efficiency and Efficacy: Training-Free Attention-Guided Switching Between Explicit and Latent Thoughts for MLLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03450v1
- Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 10:46:10 GMT
- Title: Balancing Efficiency and Efficacy: Training-Free Attention-Guided Switching Between Explicit and Latent Thoughts for MLLMs
- Abstract summary: Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) requires both fine-grained visual perception and rigorous logical deduction.<n>Explicit text-based Chain-of-Thought (CoT) is computationally expensive and prone to visual hallucinations.<n>Existing latent reasoning methods typically require costly training.
- Score: 44.74237674161132
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) requires both fine-grained visual perception and rigorous logical deduction. Explicit text-based Chain-of-Thought (CoT) is computationally expensive and prone to visual hallucinations, while existing latent reasoning methods typically require costly training. Furthermore, directly adapting training-free LLM reasoning mechanisms to the multimodal setting yields unstable performance. We identify that this failure stems from their reliance on token-level entropy, which fundamentally conflates perceptual ambiguity (e.g., unclear visual details) with logical uncertainty (e.g., complex reasoning steps). To overcome this bottleneck, we present a novel training-free inference strategy for MLLMs that explicitly decouples perception and reasoning. We propose a novel metric, the vision-to-text attention ratio, to dynamically gauge the model's cognitive focus. Guided by this metric, our proposed framework, Attention-Guided Switching (AGS), adaptively triggers latent reasoning for perceptual tokens to preserve high-fidelity visual information in the continuous space, while enforcing explicit text generation for logical tokens to maintain structural anchoring. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance, significantly improving both accuracy and inference efficiency by reducing autoregressive steps and latency. Code is released at https://github.com/swordAndSnow/MM26-AGS.
Related papers
- ATLAS: Agentic or Latent Visual Reasoning? One Word is Enough for Both [55.182037225013836]
ATLAS is a framework in which a single discrete 'word', termed as a functional token, serves both as an agentic operation and a latent visual reasoning unit.<n> ATLAS achieves superior performance on challenging benchmarks while maintaining clear interpretability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-14T17:59:55Z) - LaSER: Internalizing Explicit Reasoning into Latent Space for Dense Retrieval [74.72139580745511]
LaSER is a novel self-distillation framework that internalizes explicit reasoning into the latent space of retrievers.<n>Our method successfully combines the reasoning depth of explicit CoT pipelines with the inference efficiency of standard dense retrievers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T04:11:18Z) - Beyond the Prompt in Large Language Models: Comprehension, In-Context Learning, and Chain-of-Thought [15.598263332303612]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency across diverse tasks.<n>This study dives into the foundations of these observations by addressing three critical questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-16T10:57:26Z) - Accordion-Thinking: Self-Regulated Step Summaries for Efficient and Readable LLM Reasoning [62.680551162054975]
We introduce an end-to-end framework where LLMs learn to self-regulate the granularity of the reasoning steps through dynamic summarization.<n>We apply reinforcement learning to incentivize this capability further, uncovering a critical insight: the accuracy gap between the highly efficient Fold mode and the exhaustive Unfold mode progressively narrows.<n>Our Accordion-Thinker demonstrates that with learned self-compression, LLMs can tackle complex reasoning tasks with minimal dependency token overhead.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-03T08:34:20Z) - Fast Thinking for Large Language Models [67.7238685892317]
We introduce Latent Codebooks for Fast Thinking, a framework that uses concise CoT sketches only during training to learn a codebook of discrete strategy priors.<n>At inference, the model conditions on a handful of continuous thinking switches distilled from the codebook in a single pass, enabling strategy-level guidance without producing explicit reasoning tokens.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-28T04:19:48Z) - Decoupling Reasoning and Perception: An LLM-LMM Framework for Faithful Visual Reasoning [34.940968264459805]
We introduce a training-free visual-reasoning pipeline for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>A powerful LLM orchestrates the high-level reasoning, strategically interrogating a LMM to extract specific visual information required for its logical chain.<n>Our framework effectively governs the visual reasoning process, leading to a significant reduction in visually-unfounded reasoning steps and a substantial improvement in reasoning fidelity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-27T14:13:41Z) - Reasoning-Aligned Perception Decoupling for Scalable Multi-modal Reasoning [95.44766931218896]
Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) still lag behind text-based reasoning.<n>We introduce Perception-Reasoning Decoupling, which modularizes the MLLM's reasoning component and makes it easily replaceable.<n>We propose a novel reinforcement learning algorithm called Visual Perception Optimization (VPO) to align the MLLM's perceptual output with the final reasoning task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T02:28:07Z) - Sketch-of-Thought: Efficient LLM Reasoning with Adaptive Cognitive-Inspired Sketching [64.74765550805024]
Chain-of-Thought prompting elicits step-by-step problem solving, but often at the cost of excessive verbosity in intermediate outputs.<n>We propose Sketch-of-Thought (SoT), a prompting framework that integrates cognitively inspired reasoning paradigms with linguistic constraints.<n>SoT achieves token reductions of up to 84% with minimal accuracy loss across 18 reasoning datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-07T06:57:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.