Robust General Utility for Reinforcement Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03562v1
- Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 12:28:39 GMT
- Title: Robust General Utility for Reinforcement Learning
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning (RL) with general utility extends classic RL by optimizing an arbitrary utility functional robustness of the policy-induced occupancy measure.<n>In practice, the utility used at deployment can deviate from the training one, creating a gap that prior work does not address.<n>Motivated by this, we propose robust general-utility RL, a minimax learning framework that trains policies against utility misspecification within a prescribed uncertainty set.
- Score: 7.332941410825274
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) with general utility extends classic RL by optimizing an arbitrary utility functional of the policy-induced occupancy measure, thereby enabling a broader range of applications. However, previous work on general utility RL typically assumes the evaluation utility is fixed and correctly specified. In practice, the utility used at deployment can deviate from the training one, creating a robustness gap that prior work does not address. Motivated by this, we propose robust general-utility RL, a minimax learning framework that trains policies against utility misspecification within a prescribed uncertainty set. Our framework strictly generalizes standard general-utility RL while also providing a unified view of many existing RL frameworks, including reward-robust RL and constrained RL, through appropriate choices of the utility uncertainty set. We further develop provably convergent stochastic algorithms for two regimes. For concave utilities, we develop a projected stochastic gradient descent-ascent method and establish stationarity guarantees. For the more challenging nonconcave regime, we propose a stochastic prox-extragradient algorithm that mitigates ill-posed behavior induced by nonconcavity, with convergence guarantees to approximate first-order stationarity. Experiments on LLM safety alignment and exploration maximization tasks further corroborate the convergence behavior consistent with our theory.
Related papers
- Post-Training at the Edge of Detectability: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Fine-Tuning [58.088509347353465]
Reinforcement learning (RL) fine-tuning is widely used in language model training.<n>We propose a game-theoretic framework that gives this trade-off an explicit statistical interpretation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-29T00:19:09Z) - UP: Unbounded Positive Asymmetric Optimization for Breaking the Exploration-Stability Dilemma [32.401066562991744]
Unbounded Positive Asymmetric Optimization (UP) is a universal and plug-and-play objective.<n>UP restructures the optimization process by anchoring the policy to its current state via the stop-gradient operator.<n>UP enhances exploration capacity and achieves superior reasoning accuracy across diverse RL algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-08T04:21:42Z) - Soft Forward-Backward Representations for Zero-shot Reinforcement Learning with General Utilities [55.52456333246921]
Forward-backward algorithms can retrieve a family of policies that can approximately solve any standard RL problem.<n>We tackle the greater problem class of RL with general utilities, in which the objective is an arbitrary differentiable function of the occupancy measure.<n>We show this additional complexity can be captured by a novel, maximum entropy (soft) variant of the forward-backward algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-06T15:24:37Z) - Reinforced Latent Reasoning for LLM-based Recommendation [92.56166822197919]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities in complex problem-solving tasks.<n>Existing methods typically rely on fine-tuning with explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) data.<n>In this work, we explore an alternative approach that shifts from explicit CoT reasoning to compact, information-dense latent reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-25T11:03:45Z) - Offline Policy Optimization in RL with Variance Regularizaton [142.87345258222942]
We propose variance regularization for offline RL algorithms, using stationary distribution corrections.
We show that by using Fenchel duality, we can avoid double sampling issues for computing the gradient of the variance regularizer.
The proposed algorithm for offline variance regularization (OVAR) can be used to augment any existing offline policy optimization algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-29T18:25:01Z) - Optimal Conservative Offline RL with General Function Approximation via
Augmented Lagrangian [18.2080757218886]
offline reinforcement learning (RL) refers to decision-making from a previously-collected dataset of interactions.
We present the first set of offline RL algorithms that are statistically optimal and practical under general function approximation and single-policy concentrability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-01T19:28:48Z) - Policy Gradient for Reinforcement Learning with General Utilities [50.65940899590487]
In Reinforcement Learning (RL), the goal of agents is to discover an optimal policy that maximizes the expected cumulative rewards.
Many supervised and unsupervised RL problems are not covered in the Linear RL framework.
We derive the policy gradient theorem for RL with general utilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-03T14:57:46Z) - Policy Mirror Descent for Regularized Reinforcement Learning: A
Generalized Framework with Linear Convergence [60.20076757208645]
This paper proposes a general policy mirror descent (GPMD) algorithm for solving regularized RL.
We demonstrate that our algorithm converges linearly over an entire range learning rates, in a dimension-free fashion, to the global solution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-24T02:21:34Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.