Implementing Causal Perception: Competing SCMs and Situated Fairness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03917v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 16:48:19 GMT
• Title: Implementing Causal Perception: Competing SCMs and Situated Fairness
• Abstract summary: Causal perception occurs when agents with competing Structural Causal Models infer different probability distributions.<n>This work provides the first implementation of the causal perception framework of lvarez and Ruggieri (2025)<n>We show how causal perception affects accuracy and fairness in a multi-expert decision setting.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Causal perception occurs when agents with competing Structural Causal Models (SCMs) of the same system infer different probability distributions, including the hypothetical distributions implied by each agent's SCM under the same set of interventions. It shapes how agents reason about the system and how they perceive its fairness. Causal perception is a promising probabilistic framework, but it has remained purely theoretical. This work provides the first implementation of the causal perception framework of Álvarez and Ruggieri (2025). We operationalize structural (agents disagree on the causal graph) and parametrical (agents agree on the causal graph but disagree on its weights) causal perception. We design algorithms for computing interventional and counterfactual distributions and propose suitable distance measures to quantify the disagreement. Using the German Credit dataset, we illustrate how causal perception affects accuracy and fairness in a multi-expert decision setting. We show that the perception verdict is sensitive to the choice of distance metric and threshold. We also show that causal perception changes fairness assessments and threshold-based decisions. Bias proves situated with respect to the agent's SCM, demonstrating that competing worldviews in fairness problems cannot be ignored.

Related papers

• Causal Reasoning with Bipartite Graphical Causal Models [0.7106986689736826]
  Causal Bayesian networks (CBNs) and structural causal models (SCMs) are the dominant frameworks for graphical causal reasoning.<n>We propose bipartite graphical causal models (BGCMs), in which the structure of a system of equations is encoded by a bipartite graph with variable and equation nodes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-20T09:33:20Z)
• Explaining the "Why": A Unified Framework for the Additive Attribution of Changes in Arbitrary Measures [9.511180482257737]
  We introduce a principled framework that reframes attribution through the powerful lens of cooperative game theory.<n>Our key contribution is a classification of measures based on their mathematical structure.<n>We demonstrate our framework's superiority through a multi-faceted evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T03:49:54Z)
• Causal Inference Isn't Special: Why It's Just Another Prediction Problem [1.90365714903665]
  Causal inference is often portrayed as distinct from predictive modeling.<n>But at its core, causal inference is simply a structured instance of prediction under distribution shift.<n>This perspective reframes causal estimation as a familiar generalization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-06T01:37:50Z)
• Counterfactual Realizability [52.85109506684737]
  We introduce a formal definition of realizability, the ability to draw samples from a distribution, and then develop a complete algorithm to determine whether an arbitrary counterfactual distribution is realizable.<n>We illustrate the implications of this new framework for counterfactual data collection using motivating examples from causal fairness and causal reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T20:54:27Z)
• Fairness-Accuracy Trade-Offs: A Causal Perspective [58.06306331390586]
  We analyze the tension between fairness and accuracy from a causal lens for the first time.<n>We show that enforcing a causal constraint often reduces the disparity between demographic groups.<n>We introduce a new neural approach for causally-constrained fair learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T11:19:52Z)
• Toward A Causal Framework for Modeling Perception [22.596961524387233]
  Perception remains understudied in machine learning (ML)<n>We present a first approach to modeling perception causally.<n>We define two kinds of probabilistic causal perception: structural and parametrical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T12:08:58Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Nested Counterfactual Identification from Arbitrary Surrogate Experiments [95.48089725859298]
  We study the identification of nested counterfactuals from an arbitrary combination of observations and experiments. Specifically, we prove the counterfactual unnesting theorem (CUT), which allows one to map arbitrary nested counterfactuals to unnested ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T12:51:04Z)
• Adversarial Robustness through the Lens of Causality [105.51753064807014]
  adversarial vulnerability of deep neural networks has attracted significant attention in machine learning. We propose to incorporate causality into mitigating adversarial vulnerability. Our method can be seen as the first attempt to leverage causality for mitigating adversarial vulnerability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-11T06:55:02Z)
• Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
  We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs. We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables. We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.