Skill-Use: Can LLMs Actually Use Skills in Agentic Harnesses?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.04828v1
• Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 13:29:16 GMT
• Title: Skill-Use: Can LLMs Actually Use Skills in Agentic Harnesses?
• Abstract summary: We introduce Skill-Use, a benchmark that evaluates skill use under progressive disclosure.<n> Trigger measures whether the agent invokes the relevant skill, Compliance measures how faithfully it follows the prescribed procedure, and Boundary measures whether it avoids forbidden operations.<n>A Skill-Use (SU) score combines the three and credits execution only after the skill is triggered.
• Score: 38.776828282073865
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on skills, structured documents that specify when to act, which procedure to follow, and which tools are allowed. Existing evaluations mostly judge the quality of a skill or its contribution to task success, leaving unexamined whether an agent can recognize a relevant skill and apply it on its own. We introduce Skill-Use, a benchmark that evaluates skill use under progressive disclosure, where an agent sees only a skill's name and short description and must retrieve the full procedure before following it. Skill-Use separates three facets of skill use. Trigger measures whether the agent invokes the relevant skill, Compliance measures how faithfully it follows the prescribed procedure, and Boundary measures whether it avoids forbidden operations. A Skill-Use (SU) score combines the three and credits execution only after the skill is triggered. Skill-Use pairs 79 real skills with 177 executable tasks across nine domains, each grounded in real files, run in an isolated Docker sandbox, and scored by a trajectory-based rubric. Evaluating eight LLMs under two agent harnesses, we find that reliable skill use remains out of reach, as the strongest configuration reaches an SU of only 0.613. Triggering and procedural compliance fail as independent bottlenecks, and both scores and model rankings shift with the harness, so skill use behaves as a capability conditioned on the harness rather than a fixed property of the model.

Related papers

• Demystifying Agent Skills: Why They Work-Until They Don't [58.92875630998418]
  Existing evaluations largely measure whether skills improve aggregated task success, leaving a more fundamental question underexplored: emphtextbfWhen do skills help, why do they work, and where do they fail?<n>We isolate the effects of representation, outcome annotation, retrieval difficulty, and cross-framework of skills.<n>We consolidate these observations into a taxonomy of three high-level categories and twelve skill-use modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-14T07:26:38Z)
• Agent Skills Can Be Harmful: An Empirical Study of Skill-Induced Failures in LLM Agents [9.71657681051469]
  This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of skill-induced agent failures by attributing task failures and cost regressions to specific loaded skills.<n>We instantiate this framework on SkillsBench and SWE-Skills-Bench, yielding 307 skill-induced failures, including 125 functional failures and 182 efficiency regressions.<n>We propose research topics and tooling improvements for safer and more cost-aware skill reuse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-12T10:15:19Z)
• SkillSentry: Reliable Skill Execution for LLM Agents via Runtime Assurance [10.175883215226776]
  SkillSentry is a skill-oriented runtime assurance framework for representing runtime guidance for skill execution.<n>We evaluate SkillSentry on 15 skills across two LLM agents, each paired with two backbone models.<n>Our results show that SkillSentry improves the task success rate of LLM agents by 24.1% across skills, on average, while exhibiting lower variability across repeated runs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T08:13:52Z)
• Skill Use or Skill Theater? Evaluating the Reasoning Backroom in Skill-Augmented Language Agents [19.325317938976355]
  We ask whether skill-augmented agents exhibit a textbfReasoning Backroom, a systematic gap between stated skill use and intervention-measured influence.<n>We introduce BACKTRACE, an evaluation framework that pairs each skill-conditioned answer with a matched no-skill counterfactual.<n>We instantiate the framework as BACKROOMBench, a verified testbed spanning controlled logic and competition mathematics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T21:59:20Z)
• Generative Skill Composition for LLM Agents [58.47191648555256]
  LLM agents benefit from skills for solving complex tasks.<n>As skill libraries grow, selecting an appropriate skill composition has emerged as a central bottleneck.<n>We propose SkillComposer, which instantiates structured skill composition as task-conditioned skill sequence prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-30T17:53:09Z)
• SkillAudit: Ground-Truth-Free Skill Evolution via Paired Trajectory Auditing [81.51044612408793]
  SkillAudit is a framework for evolving agent skills without ground-truth feedback.<n>To turn behavioral differences into edit guidance, SkillAudit uses Process-Aligned Contrastive Evaluation.<n>It routes edits through two pipelines: Refine removes noisy or irrelevant guidance from broadly useful skills, while Repair replaces passages that conflict with the task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-12T08:20:09Z)
• Skill Coverage: A Test Adequacy Metric for Agent Skills [17.60316723069748]
  Agent skills encode reusable procedural knowledge that guides large language model agents across tasks and execution contexts.<n>We introduce skill coverage, a test adequacy metric that treats the skill artifact as the object under test.<n>Applying skill coverage to SkillsBench reveals that existing benchmark executions cover only 39.90 to 43.98% of skill behavior constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T10:16:05Z)
• SkillRevise: Improving LLM-Authored Agent Skills via Trace-Conditioned Skill Revision [41.562357872885826]
  We propose SkillRevise, an execution-grounded framework designed to iteratively refine agent skills.<n>SkillRevise diagnoses skill defects from execution evidence, retrieves relevant repair principles from a general memory, and applies execution-anchored edits.<n>It substantially outperforms one-shot baselines, improving the base agent's success rate on SkillsBench from 36.05% to 61.63%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-31T10:19:13Z)
• Under the Hood of SKILL.md: Semantic Supply-chain Attacks on AI Agent Skill Registry [49.83108591873481]
  We study SKILL.md - only attacks across three registry-facing stages of the Agent Skill lifecycle.<n>We show that SKILL.md is not passive documentation but operational text that shapes which third-party capabilities agents find, trust, and use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T02:11:54Z)
• SkillGen: Verified Inference-Time Agent Skill Synthesis [60.927977774369516]
  SkillGen is a framework that synthesizes a single auditable skill from trajectories generated by a base agent.<n>It identifies reusable success patterns, recurring failure modes, and behaviors that appear in nearby successes but are missing from failures.<n>A key novelty in SkillGen is that we model agent skills as interventions to empirically verify the net effect of skills on the overall performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T19:24:11Z)
• SkillMaster: Toward Autonomous Skill Mastery in LLM Agents [27.651128308229378]
  We propose SkillMaster, a training framework that teaches agents to create new skills, refine existing skills, and select accumulated skills during task solving.<n>First, we train agents through trajectory-informed skill review, teaching agents to propose, update, or retain skills based on evidence from completed episodes.<n>Second, each candidate skill edit is designed to be evaluated by its counterfactual utility on related probe tasks, providing a direct learning signal for training skill-editing decisions.<n>Third, we introduce DualAdv-GRPO, which separately estimates advantages for task-solving actions and skill-editing decisions, stabilizing joint training across task solving and
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T05:03:00Z)
• SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Tasks [61.89812116484928]
  Agent Skills are structured packages of procedural knowledge that augment LLM agents at inference time.<n>We present SkillsBench, a benchmark of 86 tasks across 11 domains paired with curated Skills and deterministic verifiers.<n>We show curated Skills raise average pass rate by 16.2 percentage points(pp), but effects vary widely by domain.<n>Self-generated Skills provide no benefit on average, showing that models cannot reliably author the procedural knowledge they benefit from consuming.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T07:06:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.