In Terms of Explainability: Refining Requirements for Self-Explainable Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06049v1
• Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 13:58:14 GMT
• Title: In Terms of Explainability: Refining Requirements for Self-Explainable Systems
• Abstract summary: We propose unified definitions in explainability based on an analysis and combination of existing definitions.<n>We present structured explainability requirements that are necessary to build (self-)explainable systems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous and software-intensive systems have been growing in occurrence, complexity, and assumed responsibility. Due to the high complexity of these systems, properties like transparency and explainability must be a focus of investigation. To date, no universally applicable definition and guide for the development of (self-)explainable systems exists. A need for explainability standards has already been recognized in the EU AI Act and the IEEE Transparency Standard 7001-2021. To address this need, we propose unified definitions in explainability based on an analysis and combination of existing definitions. Additionally, we present structured explainability requirements that are necessary to build (self-)explainable systems. By analysing the resulting taxonomy, we propose the incorporation of explanation goodness and thus correctness of explanations into the unified definitions. With our approach, we support the development of formal standards for (self-)explainable systems. Establishing such a uniform taxonomy also is a beneficial step towards certifying or auditing explainable systems.

Related papers

• AI-Assisted Systematization for Evaluating GenAI Systems [45.6388922756291]
  We develop two AI-assisted systematizers to produce concept specs for two concepts.<n>We evaluate resulting concept specs on content validity and information recoverability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T16:19:44Z)
• A Survey of Reasoning in Autonomous Driving Systems: Open Challenges and Emerging Paradigms [49.66022971508878]
  We argue that reasoning should be elevated from a modular component to the system's cognitive core.<n>We derive and systematize seven core reasoning challenges, such as the responsiveness-reasoning trade-off and social-game reasoning.<n>We identify a fundamental and unresolved tension between the high-latency, deliberative nature of LLM-based reasoning and the millisecond-scale, safety-critical demands of vehicle control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T07:40:53Z)
• Explanation Beyond Intuition: A Testable Criterion for Inherent Explainability [0.2580765958706854]
  Inherent explainability is the gold standard in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)<n>There is not a consistent definition or test to demonstrate inherent explainability.<n>We propose a globally applicable criterion for inherent explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T07:59:36Z)
• SeSE: A Structural Information-Guided Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Hallucination Detection in LLMs [43.76748192880071]
  This paper presents a principled UQ framework that quantifies the inherent semantic uncertainty of large language models.<n>We develop an adaptively sparsified directed semantic graph construction algorithm that captures directional semantic dependencies.<n>We then exploit latent semantic structural information through hierarchical abstraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T11:54:12Z)
• An Information-Flow Perspective on Explainability Requirements: Specification and Verification [5.849736173068869]
  We argue that explainable systems expose information about why certain observed effects are happening to the agents interacting with them.<n>This constitutes a positive flow of information that needs to be specified, verified, and balanced against negative information flow that may, e.g., violate privacy guarantees.<n>We show how this principle can be used to specify explainability as a system-level requirement and provide an algorithm for checking finite-state models against such specifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-01T13:50:52Z)
• Defining Self-adaptive Systems: A Systematic Literature Review [1.1715858161748571]
  In the last two decades, the popularity of self-adaptive systems in software and systems engineering has drastically increased.<n>Despite the extensive work on self-adaptive systems, the literature still lacks a common agreement on the definition of these systems.<n>Our systematic review reveals that although there has been an increasing interest in self-adaptive systems over the years, there is a scarcity of efforts to define these systems formally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T12:18:20Z)
• A Scoresheet for Explainable AI [9.503773054285558]
  This paper develops a scoresheet that can be used to specify explainability requirements or to assess the explainability aspects provided for particular applications.<n>The scoresheet is developed by considering the requirements of a range of stakeholders and is applicable to Multiagent Systems as well as other AI technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T02:08:10Z)
• When Can You Trust Your Explanations? A Robustness Analysis on Feature Importances [42.36530107262305]
  robustness of explanations plays a central role in ensuring trust in both the system and the provided explanation.<n>We propose a novel approach to analyse the robustness of neural network explanations to non-adversarial perturbations.<n>We additionally present an ensemble method to aggregate various explanations, showing how merging explanations can be beneficial for both understanding the model's decision and evaluating the robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T14:17:57Z)
• A Note on an Inferentialist Approach to Resource Semantics [48.65926948745294]
  'Inferentialism' is the view that meaning is given in terms of inferential behaviour. This paper shows how 'inferentialism' enables a versatile and expressive framework for resource semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T14:13:21Z)
• Inferentialist Resource Semantics [48.65926948745294]
  This paper shows how inferentialism enables a versatile and expressive framework for resource semantics.<n>How inferentialism seamlessly incorporates the assertion-based approach of the logic of Bunched Implications.<n>This integration enables reasoning about shared and separated resources in intuitive and familiar ways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T14:54:36Z)
• Explanation Ontology: A Model of Explanations for User-Centered AI [3.1783442097247345]
  Explanations have often added to an AI system in a non-principled, post-hoc manner. With greater adoption of these systems and emphasis on user-centric explainability, there is a need for a structured representation that treats explainability as a primary consideration. We design an explanation ontology to model both the role of explanations, accounting for the system and user attributes in the process, and the range of different literature-derived explanation types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T03:53:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.