SkillEval: Decomposing Agent Skill Quality into Interpretable Signals

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06891v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 07:25:17 GMT
• Title: SkillEval: Decomposing Agent Skill Quality into Interpretable Signals
• Abstract summary: General properties of the textttSKILL.md document play an important role in skill quality.<n>SkillEval learns an interpretable direction for each quality property from controlled positive--negative skill pairs.<n>SkillEval scores closely reflect downstream task performance, providing an early indication of whether a skill is likely to help an agent complete a task.
• Score: 27.757569384137767
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Agent skills provide reusable procedural knowledge that helps agents solve specialized tasks. As their use expands, evaluating skill quality becomes increasingly important. Existing evaluations often measure skill quality by testing whether a skill improves performance on specific downstream tasks. However, a reusable skill may apply to multiple task scenarios. Downstream evaluation mainly reflects the compatibility between a skill and the evaluated task, provides only a partial view of skill quality, and does not identify which aspect of the skill should be improved. We find that general properties of the \texttt{SKILL.md} document play an important role in skill quality. To evaluate these properties, we propose \textbf{SkillEval}, an interpretable framework for document-level skill evaluation. SkillEval evaluates each property using a fixed and inspectable scoring direction, producing interpretable scores. It further measures and reduces the influence of unrelated document features, such as length and formatting, so that each score captures its intended semantic property more specifically. Specifically, SkillEval learns an interpretable direction for each quality property from controlled positive--negative skill pairs in the hidden representation space of the model, and scores a new skill by projecting its representation onto these fixed directions. We use SkillEval to evaluate skills in controlled quality tests and show that SkillEval reliably distinguishes skills of different quality. In addition, SkillEval scores closely reflect downstream task performance, providing an early indication of whether a skill is likely to help an agent complete a task. We further explore SkillEval for diagnosing weaknesses in skill documents and guiding targeted revisions. The revised skills improve the targeted properties and achieve higher pass rates on downstream tasks.

Related papers

• Break It Down, Pass It On: Cross-Task Skill Transfer in LLM Agents [17.291924088593408]
  Large language model (LLM) agents can induce skills from completed tasks and reuse them later to grow more capable with experience.<n>In practice, induced skills may transfer unreliably and can even harm the agent that retrieves them.<n>We conduct a comprehensive and controlled study of how the way skills are induced shapes their transfer across tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-20T17:12:08Z)
• Demystifying Agent Skills: Why They Work-Until They Don't [58.92875630998418]
  Existing evaluations largely measure whether skills improve aggregated task success, leaving a more fundamental question underexplored: emphtextbfWhen do skills help, why do they work, and where do they fail?<n>We isolate the effects of representation, outcome annotation, retrieval difficulty, and cross-framework of skills.<n>We consolidate these observations into a taxonomy of three high-level categories and twelve skill-use modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-14T07:26:38Z)
• What Is a Skill Worth? Structure-Aware Shapley Valuation of Agent Skills [18.13304162006297]
  We introduce SkillSV, a structure-aware framework for skill valuation.<n> SkillSV compiles a skill into units, dependencies, and hierarchy, so that only valid counterfactual skills are evaluated.<n>It estimates the resulting values with a rollout-budgeted estimator for noisy agent evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T07:56:26Z)
• SkillCoach: Self-Evolving Rubrics for Evaluating and Enhancing Agentic Skill-Use [21.05387636058484]
  SkillCoach is a self-evolving framework for evaluating and enhancing agentic skill-use.<n>It derives skill-grounded process rubrics from real rollouts and evaluates trajectories along four dimensions.<n>It keeps the external verifier as a separate outcome signal, allowing process quality to be distinguished from accidental task success.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-02T08:28:51Z)
• SkillAudit: From Fixed-Suite Benchmarking to Skill-Centered Assessment [10.850946672552277]
  We introduce SkillAudit, an end-to-end framework for skill-centered assessment.<n>It generates a comprehensive, multi-dimensional evaluation report spanning utility, efficiency/cost, and safety.<n>After scanning top-ranked real-world skill packages, we found that over 7% of skills are at risky status.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-21T17:40:05Z)
• A Framework for Evaluating Agentic Skills at Scale [0.4509560087514856]
  Agent skills are structured, reusable knowledge artifacts that augment agent capabilities.<n>No reusable methodology exists for evaluating an individual skill.<n>We present an evaluation framework that lets a skill author construct realistic tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T11:46:56Z)
• SkillAudit: Ground-Truth-Free Skill Evolution via Paired Trajectory Auditing [81.51044612408793]
  SkillAudit is a framework for evolving agent skills without ground-truth feedback.<n>To turn behavioral differences into edit guidance, SkillAudit uses Process-Aligned Contrastive Evaluation.<n>It routes edits through two pipelines: Refine removes noisy or irrelevant guidance from broadly useful skills, while Repair replaces passages that conflict with the task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-12T08:20:09Z)
• Skill Coverage: A Test Adequacy Metric for Agent Skills [17.60316723069748]
  Agent skills encode reusable procedural knowledge that guides large language model agents across tasks and execution contexts.<n>We introduce skill coverage, a test adequacy metric that treats the skill artifact as the object under test.<n>Applying skill coverage to SkillsBench reveals that existing benchmark executions cover only 39.90 to 43.98% of skill behavior constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T10:16:05Z)
• SkillComposer: Learning to Evolve Agent Skills for Specification and Generalization [99.18305770138677]
  Agent skills are reusable strategies that guide agent reasoning and action.<n>Current skill construction methods treat the problem as one-shot extraction.<n>We introduce SkillComposer, a framework that decomposes skill construction into three learnable operations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T12:16:08Z)
• SkillGraph: Skill-Augmented Reinforcement Learning for Agents via Evolving Skill Graphs [70.1970574147839]
  We propose SKILLGRAPH, a framework that represents reusable skills as nodes in a directed graph.<n>SKILLGRAPH retrieves not just individual skills, but an ordered skill subgraph that can guide multi-step decision making.<n> Experiments show that SKILLGRAPH achieves state-of-the-art performance against memory-augmented RL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T12:21:49Z)
• SkillGen: Verified Inference-Time Agent Skill Synthesis [60.927977774369516]
  SkillGen is a framework that synthesizes a single auditable skill from trajectories generated by a base agent.<n>It identifies reusable success patterns, recurring failure modes, and behaviors that appear in nearby successes but are missing from failures.<n>A key novelty in SkillGen is that we model agent skills as interventions to empirically verify the net effect of skills on the overall performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T19:24:11Z)
• SkillOS: Learning Skill Curation for Self-Evolving Agents [67.94374107466957]
  We propose SkillOS, an experience-driven RL training recipe for learning skill curation in self-evolving agents.<n>SkillOS pairs a frozen agent executor that retrieves and applies skills with a trainable skill curator that updates an external SkillRepo from accumulated experience.<n>We show that SkillOS consistently outperforms memory-free and strong memory-based baselines in both effectiveness and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T17:31:50Z)
• From Context to Skills: Can Language Models Learn from Context Skillfully? [56.5857437218136]
  Ctx2Skill is a self-evolving framework that autonomously discovers, refines, and selects context-specific skills.<n>It can be plugged into any language model to obtain better context learning capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T09:53:15Z)
• SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Tasks [61.89812116484928]
  Agent Skills are structured packages of procedural knowledge that augment LLM agents at inference time.<n>We present SkillsBench, a benchmark of 86 tasks across 11 domains paired with curated Skills and deterministic verifiers.<n>We show curated Skills raise average pass rate by 16.2 percentage points(pp), but effects vary widely by domain.<n>Self-generated Skills provide no benefit on average, showing that models cannot reliably author the procedural knowledge they benefit from consuming.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T07:06:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.