Science Edge Evaluation: SEE the Missing Step Toward Real Scientific Discovery

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06931v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 08:06:31 GMT
• Title: Science Edge Evaluation: SEE the Missing Step Toward Real Scientific Discovery
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly involved in scientific discovery.<n>It remains unclear whether they can support complex real laboratory science.<n> Evaluation of 19 large language models (MLLMs) shows that even the best-performing model reaches only 48.7% accuracy.
• Score: 41.32793603340132
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly involved in scientific discovery, yet it remains unclear whether they can support complex real laboratory science. Here we introduce Science Edge Evaluation (SEE), a multimodal benchmark of expert-curated questions grounded in peer-reviewed literature and experimental practice in chemistry, biology, and materials science. Evaluation of 19 multimodal large language models (MLLMs) shows that even the best-performing model reaches only 48.7% accuracy. Moreover, general-purpose models outperform science-specialized models on average. In the visual-agent evaluation, the use of tools increases the best accuracy to 52.7%. Tool use can expand the information available to models, but more information does not necessarily lead to reliable scientific reasoning. The key challenge is whether models can manage tool-derived information within the boundaries of the original experimental evidence. Together, these findings reveal that current MLLMs still cannot reliably make justified and evidence-bounded inferences from experimental results, which is an essential capability in real scientific discovery. Bridging this gap requires MLLMs to transition from explaining established scientific concepts to deriving novel and evidence-based insights from experimental data.

Related papers

• Finetuning with Scientific Data Increases Hallucinations: A Multi-domain Factuality Evaluation of LLMs [8.700507644617964]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to communicate and explain scientific concepts.<n>We evaluate 18 LLMs by comparing each scientifically fine-tuned model against its general-purpose base.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-19T12:03:02Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery [91.732562776782]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to scientific research, yet prevailing science benchmarks probe decontextualized knowledge.<n>We introduce a scenario-grounded benchmark that evaluates LLMs across biology, chemistry, materials, and physics.<n>The framework assesses models at two levels: (i) question-level accuracy on scenario-tied items and (ii) project-level performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T16:20:03Z)
• ExpVid: A Benchmark for Experiment Video Understanding & Reasoning [65.17173232816818]
  We introduce ExpVid, the first benchmark designed to systematically evaluate MLLMs on scientific experiment videos.<n>We evaluate 19 leading MLLMs on ExpVid and find that while they excel at coarse-grained recognition, they struggle with disambiguating fine details, tracking state changes over time, and linking experimental procedures to scientific outcomes.<n>Our results reveal a notable performance gap between proprietary and open-source models, particularly in high-order reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T16:45:28Z)
• ScienceMeter: Tracking Scientific Knowledge Updates in Language Models [79.33626657942169]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to support scientific research, but their knowledge of scientific advancements can quickly become outdated.<n>We introduce ScienceMeter, a new framework for evaluating scientific knowledge update methods over scientific knowledge spanning the past, present, and future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T07:28:20Z)
• BoxingGym: Benchmarking Progress in Automated Experimental Design and Model Discovery [32.395366135636046]
  We introduce BoxingGym, a benchmark with 10 environments for evaluating experimental design and model discovery.<n>We compute the expected information gain (EIG), an information-theoretic quantity which measures how much an experiment reduces uncertainty about the parameters of a generative model.<n>We find that current LLMs, such as GPT-4o, struggle with both experimental design and model discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T21:15:57Z)
• LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific Discovery [141.39722070734737]
  We propose to enhance the knowledge-driven, abstract reasoning abilities of Large Language Models with the computational strength of simulations. We introduce Scientific Generative Agent (SGA), a bilevel optimization framework. We conduct experiments to demonstrate our framework's efficacy in law discovery and molecular design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T03:04:10Z)
• Diverse Explanations From Data-Driven and Domain-Driven Perspectives in the Physical Sciences [4.442043151145212]
  This Perspective explores the sources and implications of diverse explanations in machine learning applications for physical sciences. We examine how different models, explanation methods, levels of feature attribution, and stakeholder needs can result in varying interpretations of ML outputs. Our analysis underscores the importance of considering multiple perspectives when interpreting ML models in scientific contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T05:28:28Z)
• Large Language Models are Zero Shot Hypothesis Proposers [17.612235393984744]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) hold a wealth of global and interdisciplinary knowledge that promises to break down information barriers. We construct a dataset consist of background knowledge and hypothesis pairs from biomedical literature. We evaluate the hypothesis generation capabilities of various top-tier instructed models in zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-10T10:03:49Z)
• Modeling Information Change in Science Communication with Semantically Matched Paraphrases [50.67030449927206]
  SPICED is the first paraphrase dataset of scientific findings annotated for degree of information change. SPICED contains 6,000 scientific finding pairs extracted from news stories, social media discussions, and full texts of original papers. Models trained on SPICED improve downstream performance on evidence retrieval for fact checking of real-world scientific claims.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T07:44:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.