Beyond Isolation: Unlocking Reinforcement Learning Component Synergy for Sample-Efficient Continuous Control
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07086v1
- Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 10:38:31 GMT
- Title: Beyond Isolation: Unlocking Reinforcement Learning Component Synergy for Sample-Efficient Continuous Control
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning systems are significantly more complex than other machine learning paradigms.<n>Despite advances in individual algorithmic components, their functional interdependencies remain underexplored.<n>We propose ROSER, an RL framework that coordinates three critical dimensions: Model-based Representation, Optimization Stability, and Experience Replay.
- Score: 59.15149762610843
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Reinforcement learning systems are significantly more complex than other machine learning paradigms due to inherent properties, causing RL system design to jointly account for many tightly coupled factors. Despite advances in individual algorithmic components, their functional interdependencies remain underexplored: do they exhibit mutual synergy or counterproductive interference? To bridge this gap, we conduct a systematic investigation and find that the efficacy of different components exhibits significant task-dependency, and naively stacking state-of-the-art techniques does not necessarily yield performance gains; instead, it often triggers emergent challenges, such as compounded non-stationarity. Building upon these findings, we distill a suite of actionable insights into the principled coordination of these components. Guided by these insights, we propose ROSER, an RL framework that coordinates three critical dimensions: Model-based Representation, Optimization Stability, and Experience Replay. Across diverse continuous-control benchmarks, ROSER consistently outperforms vanilla baselines and achieves 17.60% gains over naive stack. Our findings underscore the necessity of a holistic perspective in RL system design and paves the way for developing sample-efficient agents.
Related papers
- ARISE-RL: Agentic Rubric-Grounded Iterative Self-Evolution with Reinforcement Learning [74.19730275669227]
ARISE-RL is a novel full-cycle self-evolution framework for training open-ended agents.<n>We present Reward-Gated Self-Evolution Distillation (RG-SED), which distills a memory-augmented variant of the same policy back into itself.<n>We also present ECR-Bench, an expert-calibrated rubric benchmark suite covering single-tool deep research and multi-tool travel planning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-01T10:54:13Z) - Relatron: Automating Relational Machine Learning over Relational Databases [50.94254514286021]
We present a study that unifies RDL and DFS in a shared design space and conducts architecture-centric searches across diverse RDB tasks.<n>Our analysis yields three key findings: (1) RDL does not consistently outperform DFS, with performance being highly task-dependent; (2) no single architecture dominates across tasks, underscoring the need for task-aware model selection; and accuracy is an unreliable guide for choice architecture.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T02:45:22Z) - Integrating Diverse Assignment Strategies into DETRs [61.61489761918158]
Label assignment is a critical component in object detectors, particularly within DETR-style frameworks.<n>We propose LoRA-DETR, a flexible and lightweight framework that seamlessly integrates diverse assignment strategies into any DETR-style detector.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-14T07:28:54Z) - Quantum Decision Transformers (QDT): Synergistic Entanglement and Interference for Offline Reinforcement Learning [0.2538209532048867]
We introduce the Quantum Decision Transformer (QDT), a novel architecture incorporating quantum-inspired computational mechanisms.<n>Our approach integrates two core components: Quantum-Inspired Attention with entanglement operations that capture non-local feature correlations, and Quantum Feedforward Networks with multi-path processing and learnable interference for adaptive computation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-09T16:47:37Z) - Rewarding the Journey, Not Just the Destination: A Composite Path and Answer Self-Scoring Reward Mechanism for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning [29.778703252962092]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for advancing Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We develop a novel test-time reward mechanism that operates without external supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-20T07:53:51Z) - CoDiEmb: A Collaborative yet Distinct Framework for Unified Representation Learning in Information Retrieval and Semantic Textual Similarity [20.349897901019574]
We introduce CoDiEmb, a unified framework for training unified text embeddings.<n>CoDiEmb integrates three key innovations for effective joint optimization.<n>Our results and analysis demonstrate that the framework mitigates cross-task trade-offs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-15T12:46:35Z) - Improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [88.55095746156428]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is widely utilized to incorporate external knowledge into large language models.<n>A standard RAG pipeline consists of several components, such as query rewriting, document retrieval, document filtering, and answer generation.<n>We propose treating the complex RAG pipeline with multiple components as a multi-agent cooperative task, in which each component can be regarded as an RL agent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-25T14:24:50Z) - A Thorough Performance Benchmarking on Lightweight Embedding-based Recommender Systems [67.52782366565658]
State-of-the-art recommender systems (RSs) depend on categorical features, which ecoded by embedding vectors, resulting in excessively large embedding tables.<n>Despite the prosperity of lightweight embedding-based RSs, a wide diversity is seen in evaluation protocols.<n>This study investigates various LERS' performance, efficiency, and cross-task transferability via a thorough benchmarking process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T07:45:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.