Same Attention, Different Truths: Put Logit-Lens over Visual Attention to Detect and Mitigate LVLM Object Hallucination

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07302v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 14:56:12 GMT
• Title: Same Attention, Different Truths: Put Logit-Lens over Visual Attention to Detect and Mitigate LVLM Object Hallucination
• Abstract summary: We find that both real and hallucinated objects receive equally strong visual attention in the model's mid-to-late layers.<n>We propose a training-free Detect-Mitigate framework comprising a Logit-Lens Consistency Check to detect hallucination.
• Score: 23.128973540926552
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) often suffer from object hallucination, generating objects that are absent from the image. Prior work largely attributes this to insufficient visual attention. However, we find that both real and hallucinated objects receive equally strong visual attention in the model's mid-to-late layers, suggesting that the key issue may not be how much the model attends, but what it attends to and why. To this end, we decode the visual features of high-attention regions using Logit Lens, and observe that regions corresponding to real objects can be correctly decoded to the target object tokens, whereas those for hallucinated objects cannot. Building on this, we identify two hallucination mechanisms: (i) visual uncertainty, triggered by semantically similar or confusable regions; masking these regions eliminates the hallucination. (ii) contextual prior, triggered by strong co-occurrence priors; even when the initially attended region is masked, the hallucination persists and attention drifts to other regions. Based on these findings, we propose a simple yet effective training-free Detect-Mitigate framework comprising a Logit-Lens Consistency Check to detect hallucination and targeted remedies: High-Attention Regions Masking (HARM) for visual uncertainty hallucination, and Visual Evidence Enhanced Decoding (VEED) for contextual prior hallucination. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art results on multiple hallucination benchmarks. Code will be available.

Related papers

• HIVE: Understanding Post-Hallucination Reasoning in Vision Language Models [70.67112531913669]
  Hallucinations in vision language models are commonly treated as semantic errors.<n>Prior work mainly focuses on detecting or suppressing hallucinations at generation time.<n>We study Post Hallucination Reasoning (PHR), the stage in which hallucinated semantics enter the model's inference context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T15:02:11Z)
• Watch Closely: Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Disentangled Decoding [22.560247372346435]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) bridge the gap between visual and linguistic modalities.<n>These models often fail to accurately identify certain objects, leading to text generation that appears fluent but does not correspond to the visual content.<n>We introduce Hallucination Disentangled Decoding (HDD) method that requires no training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T06:20:53Z)
• VEGAS: Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via Vision-Encoder Attention Guided Adaptive Steering [5.541436522468184]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) produce outputs that are linguistically fluent but factually inconsistent with the visual evidence.<n>We show that LVLMs tend to hallucinate when their final visual-attention maps fail to concentrate on key image objects.<n>We introduce VEGAS, a method that integrates the vision encoder's attention maps into the language model's mid-layers and adaptively steers tokens which fail to concentrate on key image objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T23:33:50Z)
• Two Causes, Not One: Rethinking Omission and Fabrication Hallucinations in MLLMs [31.601057368065877]
  Existing methods, based on the flawed assumption that omission and fabrication hallucinations share a common cause, often reduce omissions only to trigger more fabrications.<n>In this work, we overturn this view by demonstrating that omission hallucinations arise from insufficient confidence when mapping perceived visual features to linguistic expressions.<n>We propose the Visual-Semantic Attention Potential Field, a conceptual framework that reveals how visual evidence to infer the presence or absence of objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-30T05:47:41Z)
• When Semantics Mislead Vision: Mitigating Large Multimodal Models Hallucinations in Scene Text Spotting and Understanding [75.57997630182136]
  We investigate the underlying causes of semantic hallucination and identify a key finding: Transformer layers in Large Multimodal Models with stronger attention focus on scene text regions are less prone to producing semantic hallucinations.<n>We propose a training-free semantic hallucination mitigation framework comprising two key components: ZoomText and Grounded Layer Correction.<n>Our method not only effectively mitigates semantic hallucination but also achieves strong performance on public benchmarks for scene text spotting and understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T19:53:19Z)
• Towards a Systematic Evaluation of Hallucinations in Large-Vision Language Models [57.58426038241812]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in complex multimodal tasks.<n>These models still suffer from hallucinations when required to implicitly recognize or infer diverse visual entities from images.<n>We propose a novel visual question answering (VQA) benchmark that employs contextual reasoning prompts as hallucination attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-29T23:56:01Z)
• Devils in Middle Layers of Large Vision-Language Models: Interpreting, Detecting and Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Attention Lens [7.806633929976787]
  Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) significantly undermine their reliability.<n>This paper addresses how LVLMs process visual information and whether this process causes hallucination.<n>We propose a simple inference-time method that adjusts visual attention by integrating information across various heads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T03:40:05Z)
• From Pixels to Tokens: Revisiting Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models [15.401221354325672]
  Hallucinations in large vision models (LVLMs) are a significant challenge, i.e., generating objects that are not presented in the visual input.<n>Recent studies often attribute hallucinations to a lack of understanding of visual input, yet ignore a more fundamental issue: the model's inability to extract or decouple visual features.<n>In this paper, we revisit the hallucinations in LVLMs from an architectural perspective, investigating whether the primary cause lies in the visual encoder (feature extraction) or the modal alignment module (feature decoupling)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T11:46:32Z)
• Does Object Grounding Really Reduce Hallucination of Large Vision-Language Models? [53.89380284760555]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) produce captions that mention concepts that cannot be found in the image. These hallucinations erode the trustworthiness of LVLMs and are arguably among the main obstacles to their ubiquitous adoption. Recent work suggests that addition of grounding objectives -- those that explicitly align image regions or objects to text spans -- reduces the amount of LVLM hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T16:56:11Z)
• Visual Description Grounding Reduces Hallucinations and Boosts Reasoning in LVLMs [52.497823009176074]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) often produce responses that misalign with factual information, a phenomenon known as hallucinations.<n>We introduce Visual Description Grounded Decoding (VDGD), a training-free method designed to enhance visual perception and improve reasoning capabilities in LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T16:21:59Z)
• Logical Closed Loop: Uncovering Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models [52.957842999317506]
  Object hallucination refers to the phenomenon that the LVLMs claim non-existent objects in the image. We propose a Logical Closed Loop-based framework for Object Hallucination Detection and Mitigation, namely LogicCheckGPT. As a plug-and-play method, it can be seamlessly applied to all existing LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T15:28:39Z)
• Analyzing and Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models [110.12460299261531]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have shown remarkable abilities in understanding visual information with human languages. LVLMs still suffer from object hallucination, which is the problem of generating descriptions that include objects that do not actually exist in the images. We propose a powerful algorithm, LVLM Hallucination Revisor (LURE), to rectify object hallucination in LVLMs by reconstructing less hallucinatory descriptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T18:10:53Z)
• Plausible May Not Be Faithful: Probing Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Pre-training [66.0036211069513]
  Large-scale vision-language pre-trained models are prone to hallucinate non-existent visual objects when generating text. We show that models achieving better scores on standard metrics could hallucinate objects more frequently. Surprisingly, we find that patch-based features perform the best and smaller patch resolution yields a non-trivial reduction in object hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T10:27:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.