Curriculum as Code: An AI-Assisted Architecture for Instructional Design in STEM Education
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07364v1
- Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 16:09:10 GMT
- Title: Curriculum as Code: An AI-Assisted Architecture for Instructional Design in STEM Education
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a six-phase AI-assisted instructional design architecture based on the Curriculum as Code paradigm.<n>It integrates Generative AI with tacit and Python to automate the creation of reproducible, visually consistent, and technically precise materials for STEM education.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Contribution: This paper presents a six-phase AI-assisted instructional design architecture based on the Curriculum as Code paradigm, integrating Generative AI with LaTeX and Python to automate the creation of reproducible, visually consistent, and technically precise materials for STEM education. Background: Creating customized instructional materials for active learning imposes a heavy workload on faculty. Standard presentation tools lack robust support for technical content, while current AI applications often hallucinate and fail to formalize the instructional authoring process, limiting their utility for rigorous academic design. Intended Outcomes: The framework aims to reduce preparation time while ensuring mathematical accuracy, adherence to institutional visual identity, and preservation of the instructor's tacit pedagogical knowledge through explicit rules. Application Design: The solution comprises a six-phase pipeline that replaces ad-hoc prompt engineering with a systematic workflow, utilizing text-based interfaces and code-driven generation (LaTeX/Beamer for slides, Python for figures), governed by pedagogical constraints, contextual calibrations, and automated review cycles. Findings: Validated over one year across 8 modules and 28 project contexts in a Project-Based Learning environment, the architecture significantly reduced instructor workload. Generated assets underwent independent peer review and were deployed by six different faculty members, confirming scalability beyond a single author. Based on over 600 voluntary student evaluations, materials achieved high quality ratings from 8.5 to 9.9/10. Results indicate high reproducibility, minimized hallucinations, and sustained pedagogical and visual fidelity, suggesting viability for broad STEM educational applications.
Related papers
- Code as Representation: A Compilable Parsing Paradigm for Academic Documents [50.40789738182074]
Compilable Academic Document Parsing (CADP) is a paradigm that reconstructs a full page as contextual La plus executable Python.<n>We introduce CADP-Bench, an expert-verified benchmark of full academic pages containing text and multiple SAE types.<n>Results show that even frontier models still struggle to produce high-fidelity executable reconstructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-18T09:10:43Z) - CAPRA: Scaling Feedback on Software Architecture Deliverables with a Multi-Agent LLM System [4.37294181347758]
This paper presents CAPRA, a multi-agent system that analyzes software architecture deliverables to generate template-compliant architectural feedback.<n>Preliminary empirical evaluation on 10 reports shows that CAPRA satisfied 88.8% the evaluated criteria.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T12:00:21Z) - Beyond AI Delegation: A Prompt Pattern Framework for Productive Struggle and Evaluative Judgement in Secure Coding Education [0.45706494756895794]
Large language models make it easy for students to delegate writing, analysis, and problem-solving to automated systems.<n>We introduce a practical framework that helps educators keep GenAI in the course without removing the cognitive demands that make it worthwhile.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-23T07:35:49Z) - MAIC-UI: Making Interactive Courseware with Generative UI [55.66338307665182]
We present MAIC-UI, a zero-code authoring system that enables educators to create and rapidly edit interactive courseware.<n>MAIC-UI employs structured knowledge analysis with multi-modal understanding to ensure pedagogical rigor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-28T16:15:04Z) - From Understanding to Creation: A Prerequisite-Free AI Literacy Course with Technical Depth Across Majors [2.1212179660694104]
UNIV 182 is a prerequisite-free course that teaches undergraduates across majors to understand, use, evaluate, and build AI systems.<n>The paper situates this design within a comparative taxonomy of cross-major AI literacy courses and pedagogical traditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-19T23:18:43Z) - ARIA: Adaptive Retrieval Intelligence Assistant -- A Multimodal RAG Framework for Domain-Specific Engineering Education [1.084959821967413]
ARIA is a framework for creating intelligent teaching assistants across university-level courses.<n>ARIA correctly answered all 20 relevant course questions while rejecting 58 of 60 non-relevant queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T01:08:24Z) - EZYer: A simulacrum of high school with generative agent [9.01137030259017]
The proposed generative agent EZYer generates structured teaching materials and dynamic Beamer courseware.<n>This paper designs five-dimensional evaluation indexes of content accuracy, knowledge coverage, usability, formatting correctness and visual design and appeal.<n>The results show that the quality of EZYer-generated content is excellent and has a good application prospect.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-02T09:28:59Z) - Presenting a Paper is an Art: Self-Improvement Aesthetic Agents for Academic Presentations [45.976132936852316]
textbfEvoPresent is a self-improvement agent framework for academic papers.<n>It unifies coherent narratives, aesthetic-aware designs, and realistic presentation delivery via virtual characters.<n>Central to EvoPresent is textbfPresAesth, a multi-task reinforcement learning (RL) aesthetic model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-07T04:24:26Z) - Evaluating Large Language Models for Real-World Engineering Tasks [75.97299249823972]
This paper introduces a curated database comprising over 100 questions derived from authentic, production-oriented engineering scenarios.<n>Using this dataset, we evaluate four state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our results show that LLMs demonstrate strengths in basic temporal and structural reasoning but struggle significantly with abstract reasoning, formal modeling, and context-sensitive engineering logic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-12T14:05:23Z) - RAS: Retrieval-And-Structuring for Knowledge-Intensive LLM Generation [46.237206695937246]
We propose Retrieval-And-Structuring (RAS), a framework that dynamically constructs query-specific knowledge graphs.<n>On seven knowledge-intensive benchmarks, RAS consistently outperforms strong baselines.<n>Our results demonstrate that dynamic, query-specific knowledge structuring offers a robust path to improving reasoning accuracy and robustness in language model generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-16T05:01:49Z) - Empowering Private Tutoring by Chaining Large Language Models [87.76985829144834]
This work explores the development of a full-fledged intelligent tutoring system powered by state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs)
The system is into three inter-connected core processes-interaction, reflection, and reaction.
Each process is implemented by chaining LLM-powered tools along with dynamically updated memory modules.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-15T02:42:03Z) - ProtoTransformer: A Meta-Learning Approach to Providing Student Feedback [54.142719510638614]
In this paper, we frame the problem of providing feedback as few-shot classification.
A meta-learner adapts to give feedback to student code on a new programming question from just a few examples by instructors.
Our approach was successfully deployed to deliver feedback to 16,000 student exam-solutions in a programming course offered by a tier 1 university.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-23T22:41:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.