DarwinX: Evolving Agent Harnesses Through Natural Selection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07545v1
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 05:34:02 GMT
- Title: DarwinX: Evolving Agent Harnesses Through Natural Selection
- Abstract summary: DarwinX treats self-evolution as selection over a population of harnesses with the model frozen.<n>General agent competence, not benchmark-specific patches, so it survives changes of task, verifier, and base model.
- Score: 48.64258219266629
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: An LLM agent's capability depends not only on model weights but on its harness: prompts, tools, skills, and control flow. Self-improvement loops already edit harnesses, yet single-lineage search is path-dependent and local wins often regress other tasks. We introduce DarwinX, which treats self-evolution as selection over a population of harnesses with the model frozen: a preserve-and-extend contract admits only variants that extend coverage without regressing, an archive keeps alternative lineages for recombination, and failure-, teacher-, and self-derived evidence share one edit interface. Fitness comes from each benchmark's own verifier: no gold solutions, no hand-picked winners. Across four benchmarks that progressively separate the evolution signal from the test, one loop adds about 17 points on average: Terminal-Bench 2.1 rises +7.7 to 83.2% on a matched base and to the verified frontier at 84.7% on a stronger one; TerminalWorld's held-out split reaches 68.3%, ahead of every off-the-shelf agent; WebArena-Infinity real-task pass@1 rises from 43.5% to 93.0% audit-clean; and a Terminal-Bench 2.1 harness transfers unchanged to SWE-bench Verified. What evolves is general agent competence, not benchmark-specific patches, so it survives changes of task, verifier, and base model. A frozen model need not be a fixed agent: harness selection turns evaluation compute into durable capability.
Related papers
- ReDraft, Don't Just Distill: Reference-Driven Revision for Continual VLLM Post-Training [66.72708893922605]
Post-training of large multimodal models should add new capabilities while preserving those from pre-training.<n>SFT gives explicit target supervision that learns a task from near-zero accuracy, but its off-policy targets move the model far enough to cause forgetting.<n>We introduce ReDraft, which obtains both from the model's own failures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-15T04:59:03Z) - EVOHARNESSBENCH: Can Your Agents Keep Pace with an Evolving Harness? [83.21711423118768]
EVOHARNESSBENCH is a benchmark for evaluating agents under controlled harness evolution.<n>It contains 17 multi-stage harness streams constructed deterministically from verifier-based benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-03T03:24:02Z) - UpgradeBench: A Decision-Centric Benchmark for Upgrading Fine-Tuned LLM Specialists [10.23869027501654]
We present Upgrade, a decision-driven longitudinal benchmark covering four consecutive Qwen releases.<n>Upgrade disentangles three core questions: whether a new checkpoint improves fixed-recipe retrained specialist performance, whether assets transfer across versions, and what recovery resources are usable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-21T09:37:47Z) - Rethinking Self-Evolving Agent Skills: Feedback Dynamics over Multiple Rounds [43.5891705224868]
Self-evolving skill systems promise to improve agents by turning execution feedback into persistent skill updates without changing the underlying model.<n>We present a controlled evaluation framework across five benchmarks and three models.<n>Overall, persistent skill self-evolution is better understood as sparse, validation-filtered search with model- and benchmark-dependent returns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-31T04:02:51Z) - Auto Research for Materials: Auditable AI-Scientist Workflows with Held-Out Transfer [13.399139714704226]
An AI research agent can improve the score it sees without finding a modelling change that works on new materials.<n>We show that closed-loop agents can produce decisions that survive unseen evidence and code changes that can be reused across tasks and combined.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-19T07:02:44Z) - Self-Evolving Agent Harnesses via Gated Semantic Quality-Diversity [10.3661763716032]
In deployment the harness is often the only lever available, so improving it automatically is the natural way to raise performance without touching the weights.<n>We present a self-evolving agent-harness framework that separates proposing changes from crediting them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-15T10:26:26Z) - Agentic Harness Engineering: Observability-Driven Automatic Evolution of Coding-Agent Harnesses [57.20181537213498]
Agentic Harness Engineering (AHE) is a closed loop that automates harness engineering.<n>AHE addresses challenges through three matched observability pillars.<n>Ten AHE lift pass@1 on Terminal-Bench 2 from 69.7% to 77.0%, surpassing the human-designed harness Codex-CLI.<n>On SWE-bench-verified it tops aggregate success at 12% fewer tokens than the seed, and on Terminal-Bench 2 it yields +5.1 to +10.1pp cross-family gains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-28T16:55:02Z) - Eigen-1: Adaptive Multi-Agent Refinement with Monitor-Based RAG for Scientific Reasoning [53.45095336430027]
We develop a unified framework that combines implicit retrieval and structured collaboration.<n>On Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) Bio/Chem Gold, our framework achieves 48.3% accuracy.<n>Results on SuperGPQA and TRQA confirm robustness across domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T14:05:55Z) - Evolving Language Models without Labels: Majority Drives Selection, Novelty Promotes Variation [74.75716642635484]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly trained with reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR)<n>We propose EVOL-RL, a label-free framework that mirrors the evolutionary principle of balancing selection with variation.<n>EVOL-RL consistently outperforms the majority-only baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-18T17:50:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.