"Always Want to Use it for Everything": Understanding Young Adults' Perceptions of AI Dependence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07592v1
• Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 20:50:29 GMT
• Title: "Always Want to Use it for Everything": Understanding Young Adults' Perceptions of AI Dependence
• Abstract summary: We collected testimonials from young adults aged 18 to 25 through an online questionnaire.<n>We identified three contributing factors of AI dependence: chronic use, efficiency, and delegation.<n>We argue that preventing lasting harm to young adults' development is paramount.
• Score: 9.22654434898775
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The growing integration of general-purpose AI chatbots into people's daily lives has raised concerns about the potential for unhealthy dependence, particularly among young adults. As a first step toward understanding and characterizing AI chatbot dependence from the perspective of young adults, we collected testimonials from AI chatbot users aged 18 to 25 through an online questionnaire to capture their thoughts and experiences with this phenomenon. From participant responses, we identified three contributing factors of AI dependence: chronic use, efficiency, and delegation. The combination of these in a person's interaction behavior was considered to indicate AI dependence. Participants also observed feelings of atrophy in abilities from AI dependence, leading to psychological impacts such as feelings of inadequacy. Interpreting these findings through the lens of self-determination theory reveals how AI chatbot dependence can impact young adults' personal and social development. We argue that preventing lasting harm to young adults' development is paramount, and provide implications for rethinking AI chatbot dependence grounded in this understanding.

Related papers

• AI Empathy Erodes Cognitive Autonomy in Younger Users [0.4779196219827507]
  Affective alignment in generative AI represents a systemic risk to the developmental autonomy of younger users.<n>This paper exposes the misalignment between adult-labeled reward signals and the developmental requirements of younger users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T18:28:52Z)
• Generative Confidants: How do People Experience Trust in Emotional Support from Generative AI? [4.442753300582291]
  People are increasingly turning to generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot) for emotional support and companionship.<n>While trust is likely to play a central role in enabling these informal and unsupervised interactions, we still lack an understanding of how people develop and experience it in this context.<n>We conducted a qualitative study consisting of diary entries about interactions, transcripts of chats with AI, and in-depth interviews.<n>Our results suggest important novel drivers of trust in this context: familiarity emerging from personalisation, nuanced mental models of generative AI, and awareness of people's control over conversations
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T11:19:41Z)
• How AI Companionship Develops: Evidence from a Longitudinal Study [14.69112262771543]
  We studied the psychological pathway from users' mental models of the agent to parasocial experiences, social interaction, and the psychological impact of AI companions.<n>Results suggest a longitudinal model of AI companionship development and demonstrate an empirical method to study human-AI companionship.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T07:36:47Z)
• Ask ChatGPT: Caveats and Mitigations for Individual Users of AI Chatbots [10.977907906989342]
  ChatGPT and other Large Language Model (LLM)-based AI chatbots become increasingly integrated into individuals' daily lives.<n>What concerns and risks do these systems pose for individual users?<n>What potential harms might they cause, and how can these be mitigated?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-14T01:40:13Z)
• ChatWise: A Strategy-Guided Chatbot for Enhancing Cognitive Support in Older Adults [38.064067293831066]
  We propose a strategy-guided AI chatbots named ChatWise that follows a dual-level conversation reasoning framework.<n>It integrates macro-level strategy planning and micro-level utterance generation to enable engaging, multi-turn dialogue tailored to older adults.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T21:32:09Z)
• Empathetic Response in Audio-Visual Conversations Using Emotion Preference Optimization and MambaCompressor [44.499778745131046]
  Our study introduces a dual approach: firstly, we employ Emotional Preference Optimization (EPO) to train chatbots.<n>This training enables the model to discern fine distinctions between correct and counter-emotional responses.<n> Secondly, we introduce MambaCompressor to effectively compress and manage extensive conversation histories.<n>Our comprehensive experiments across multiple datasets demonstrate that our model significantly outperforms existing models in generating empathetic responses and managing lengthy dialogues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-23T13:44:51Z)
• Let people fail! Exploring the influence of explainable virtual and robotic agents in learning-by-doing tasks [45.23431596135002]
  This study compares the effects of classic vs. partner-aware explanations on human behavior and performance during a learning-by-doing task. Results indicated that partner-aware explanations influenced participants differently based on the type of artificial agents involved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T13:22:04Z)
• "I Am the One and Only, Your Cyber BFF": Understanding the Impact of GenAI Requires Understanding the Impact of Anthropomorphic AI [55.99010491370177]
  We argue that we cannot thoroughly map the social impacts of generative AI without mapping the social impacts of anthropomorphic AI. anthropomorphic AI systems are increasingly prone to generating outputs that are perceived to be human-like.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T04:57:41Z)
• Human Bias in the Face of AI: Examining Human Judgment Against Text Labeled as AI Generated [48.70176791365903]
  This study explores how bias shapes the perception of AI versus human generated content.<n>We investigated how human raters respond to labeled and unlabeled content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T04:31:45Z)
• Measuring Human Contribution in AI-Assisted Content Generation [66.06040950325969]
  This study raises the research question of measuring human contribution in AI-assisted content generation.<n>By calculating mutual information between human input and AI-assisted output relative to self-information of AI-assisted output, we quantify the proportional information contribution of humans in content generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T05:56:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.