Finite Constant Frontiers and Auditable Regret Certificates for Average-Reward Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07725v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 19:28:58 GMT
• Title: Finite Constant Frontiers and Auditable Regret Certificates for Average-Reward Reinforcement Learning
• Abstract summary: We introduce a constant-aware comparison protocol and derive an explicit finite lower certificate for communicating MDPs.<n>A common closed-form envelope improves the published coefficient $0.015$ across a finite frontier.
• Score: 0.9558392439655014
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Average-reward reinforcement-learning regret is known up to logarithmic factors, but the numerical content of published guarantees is difficult to compare because probability mode, structural parameter, logarithmic normalization, prior information, and planning assumptions differ. We introduce a constant-aware comparison protocol and derive an explicit finite lower certificate for communicating MDPs. The construction is a binary tree of two-state blocks; its proof uses exact trajectory-level Bernoulli KL divergence and keeps action budget, diameter, occupancy, navigation cost, and terminal bias explicit. A common closed-form envelope improves the published coefficient $0.015$ across a finite frontier: $0.0200$ in a moderate regime and up to $0.0291$ under stronger action, diameter, and horizon conditions, a $94\%$ increase. The limiting coefficient is $\frac1{32}\sqrt{(A-3)/A}$. For upper bounds, we give an auditable composition rule for a span-constrained optimistic learner, but do not claim a coefficient while adaptive directional-variance and planning certificates remain open. We also formalize valid expectation conversion and constant comparability. Controlled diagnostics test diameter dependence, bonus-by-width interactions, span misspecification, and the finite lower certificate on its exact family.

Related papers

• Compute-Bounded Security Assurance - Coverage, Verification, and Response under Resource Constraints [0.0]
  Additional inference compute can increase the number of correctly resolved security-assurance tasks.<n>We develop a resource-constrained framework that separates success, unique coverage, accepted evidence, and operational protection.<n>A conceptual defensive architecture separates evidence analysis, adjudication, and operational authority.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-07T13:07:55Z)
• Constrained Online Learning with Noisy Constraint Values [55.29259818039367]
  Under common feasibility, our LEDGER algorithm attains $O(sqrt T)$ expected regret and $O(sqrtTlog(eT))$ expected budget violation.<n>Neither a Slater condition, independence between feedback channels, nor an absolute constraint-value bound is needed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-07T01:38:41Z)
• Robust Average-Reward Markov Decision Processes: Minimax-Optimal Learning via Plug-in Reductions [51.50375419691955]
  Distributionally robust Markov decision processes provide a principled framework for sequential decision making under model uncertainty.<n>We study how many samples are necessary and sufficient to learn an $varepsilon$-optimal robust policy under the average-reward criterion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T19:49:48Z)
• Between-User Collapse Under Popularity-Biased Feedback: A Centered-Covariance Theorem and Computable Phase Boundary [0.0]
  We study how popularity-biased BPR training reshapes the between-user geometry of collaborative-filtering embeddings.<n>We prove that under popularity-biased feedback with stationary items, $C$ converges to a steady state.<n>We then examine the limits of the effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T17:33:25Z)
• Bayesian Best-Arm Identification with Abstention: A Polynomial-to-Exponential Phase Transition [51.253617466579335]
  We study the Bayesian fixed-budget best-arm identification problem in which a learner can abstain from making a terminal recommendation.<n>We analyze the probability of undetected error--the risk of recommending a suboptimal arm without abstaining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-28T05:07:27Z)
• The Extrapolation Cliff in On-Policy Distillation of Near-Deterministic Structured Outputs [52.709361620508595]
  ListOPD brings a student to in-domain with an 8B-SFT baseline at one-fifth the parameters.<n>On Amazon Fashion, three pre-registered tests--a fine-grid cliff interval test, and a small-clip cross-prediction--fall within their locked prediction windows--with the small-clip value matching the closed-form prediction below grid resolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T06:48:00Z)
• Tokens-per-Parameter Coverage Is Critical for Robust LLM Scaling Law Extrapolation [45.56738584872585]
  Neural scaling laws approximate a language model's loss as a power-law function of parameter count $N$ and token count $D$.<n>We show that a collinear design induces an inherent ill-conditioning in the Gauss-Newton least-squares problem.<n>We prove this for four scaling-law formalisms and derive a closed-form TPP-diversity threshold that is necessary and sufficient for well-conditioned estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T23:00:17Z)
• Optimal Unconstrained Self-Distillation in Ridge Regression: Strict Improvements, Precise Asymptotics, and One-Shot Tuning [61.07540493350384]
  Self-distillation (SD) is the process of retraining a student on a mixture of ground-truth and the teacher's own predictions.<n>We show that for any prediction risk, the optimally mixed student improves upon the ridge teacher for every regularization level.<n>We propose a consistent one-shot tuning method to estimate $star$ without grid search, sample splitting, or refitting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T17:21:15Z)
• Wasserstein-regularized Conformal Prediction under General Distribution Shift [21.29977879431466]
  Conformal prediction yields a prediction set with guaranteed $1-alpha$ coverage of the true target under the i.i.d. assumption.<n>We propose a Wasserstein distance-based upper bound of the coverage gap and analyze the bound using probability measure pushforwards.<n>We exploit the separation to design an algorithm based on importance weighting and regularized representation learning (WR-CP) to reduce the Wasserstein bound with a finite-sample error bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T07:29:44Z)
• Limit Distribution Theory for the Smooth 1-Wasserstein Distance with Applications [18.618590805279187]
  smooth 1-Wasserstein distance (SWD) $W_1sigma$ was recently proposed as a means to mitigate the curse of dimensionality in empirical approximation. This work conducts a thorough statistical study of the SWD, including a high-dimensional limit distribution result.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T17:02:24Z)
• Provably Efficient Safe Exploration via Primal-Dual Policy Optimization [105.7510838453122]
  We study the Safe Reinforcement Learning (SRL) problem using the Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) formulation. We present an provably efficient online policy optimization algorithm for CMDP with safe exploration in the function approximation setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-01T17:47:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.