Adaptive Supervised Anchoring for On-Policy Self-Distillation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07935v2
• Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:28:10 GMT
• Title: Adaptive Supervised Anchoring for On-Policy Self-Distillation
• Abstract summary: On-policy self-distillation adapts a language model by distilling guidance from a frozen teacher on trajectories sampled from the student.<n>We show that when student rollouts drift from target trajectories, conditioning the teacher on off-target prefixes substantially weakens its task-relevant supervision.<n>We propose a unified training framework that separates two complementary supervision pathways.
• Score: 15.445625053566244
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) adapts a language model by distilling guidance from a frozen teacher on trajectories sampled from the student. Its effectiveness, however, depends critically on the quality of those trajectories. We show that when student rollouts drift from target trajectories, conditioning the teacher on off-target prefixes substantially weakens its task-relevant supervision. Controlled prefix-corruption experiments expose this failure mode, which we term rollout-conditioned signal degradation. To address this problem, we propose a unified training framework that separates two complementary supervision pathways. The first retains rollout-conditioned distribution matching, providing guidance on states the student actually visits. The second applies supervised cross-entropy on canonical ground-truth contexts, avoiding the incompatibility of imposing target tokens on erroneous rollout prefixes. Token-level rollout-target alignment is used to adapt the strength of the canonical-context anchor, emphasizing it during cold start and relaxing it as rollout quality improves. Experiments across multiple model scales, two task families, and general-reasoning benchmarks show that the proposed approach improves task acquisition over OPSD while preserving general capabilities, resulting in a more favorable empirical plasticity-stability trade-off. These findings identify context quality as a central bottleneck in on-policy self-distillation and demonstrate the value of separating rollout-conditioned guidance from canonical supervision.

Related papers

• Purified OPSD: On-Policy Self-Distillation Without Losing How to Think [52.879387744920415]
  We find that on-policy self-distillation (OPSD) consistently fails on long chain-of-thought (long-CoT) reasoning models.<n>We propose a two-step solution: first, we construct a reference-only teacher to isolate the non-transferable component of the supervision signal.<n>Second, we use pointwise mutual information (PMI) as the mechanism to transform this residual into a well-formed PMI target distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-02T14:33:07Z)
• Rethinking Reward Supervision: Rubric-Conditioned Self-Distillation [60.55792673956761]
  We propose textbfRubric-Conditioned Self-Distillation, a framework that incorporates rubrics as structured, fine-grained feedback for on-policy self-distillation.<n>We evaluate on a diverse suite of science reasoning benchmarks and results show that rubric-conditioned self-distillation effectively converts rubric-level criteria into token-level guidance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T17:54:04Z)
• HERO: Hindsight-Enhanced Reflection from Environment Observations for Agentic Self-Distillation [50.53459634301361]
  HERO is a hindsight-enhanced self-distillation framework that uses next environment observations as locally aligned feedback.<n> HERO improves task success and reduces unnecessary turns over environment-feedback-only self-distillation and GRPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T01:35:34Z)
• When In-Distribution Gains Fail: Evaluating Weak-to-Strong Reward Models under Preference Shift [72.0686608132772]
  We study W2S preference learning under zero-shot distribution shift.<n>We find that strong students trained on weak preference labels can appear successful in-distribution while failing to transfer across preference datasets.<n>We propose Representation Anchoring (Anchor), a simple yet effective regularizer that constrains excessive drift from the pretrained strong model's representation space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T09:30:49Z)
• Prefix Teach, Suffix Fade: Local Teachability Collapse in Strong-to-Weak On-Policy Distillation [49.117085054884676]
  On-policy distillation trains a student model on its own rollouts using dense feedback from a stronger teacher.<n>We operationalize this principle through a trajectory-specific release rule.<n> Experimental results across strong-to-weak distillation tasks indicate that this release rule consistently outperforms standard full-trajectory OPD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T15:05:30Z)
• OGLS-SD: On-Policy Self-Distillation with Outcome-Guided Logit Steering for LLM Reasoning [19.98950359294245]
  We study on-policy self-distillation (OPSD), where a language model improves its reasoning ability by distilling privileged teacher distributions along its own on-policy trajectories.<n>Despite the performance gains of OPSD, we identify a common but often overlooked mismatch between teacher and student responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T17:00:53Z)
• The Illusion of Certainty: Decoupling Capability and Calibration in On-Policy Distillation [67.26315138466312]
  We propose a calibration-aware OPD framework, CaOPD, that estimates empirical confidence from model rollouts.<n>Our findings highlight that capability distillation does not imply confidence, and that confidence should be treated as an essential objective in post-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-18T04:43:40Z)
• SCOPE: Signal-Calibrated On-Policy Distillation Enhancement with Dual-Path Adaptive Weighting [17.504616835765617]
  We propose a dual-path adaptive training framework that routes on-policy rollouts by correctness into two complementary supervision paths.<n>SCOPE achieves an average relative improvement of 11.42% in Avg@32 and 7.30% in Pass@32 over competitive baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-12T15:26:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.