A Unified Framework for Dynamic Reward Shaping in Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.08158v1
• Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2026 14:35:29 GMT
• Title: A Unified Framework for Dynamic Reward Shaping in Reinforcement Learning
• Abstract summary: This study introduces a unified analytical framework for comparing dynamic reward shaping and neighbouring adaptive reward mechanisms.<n>It highlights the conditions under which optimality guarantees survive contemporary deep reinforcement learning pipelines.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Sparse, delayed, and weakly informative rewards remain central obstacles to efficient reinforcement learning. Reward shaping addresses these limitations by supplementing the task reward with an auxiliary signal that can accelerate learning while, in the classical setting, the original objective remains the evaluation criterion. Established theory guarantees safety for fixed shaping signals: potential-based reward shaping preserves optimal policies when the auxiliary term is the discounted difference of a time-invariant potential. In contemporary reinforcement learning systems, however, both the learner and the information available for guidance evolve during training: value estimates improve, novelty diminishes, feedback shifts, and predictive models are refined. Adaptive reward mechanisms occur across exploration, Bayesian inference, human-in-the-loop learning, automated reward design, and foundation-model-based approaches. This study introduces a unified analytical framework for comparing dynamic reward shaping and neighbouring adaptive reward mechanisms. The proposed framework distinguishes parametric revision from state-dependent variation, separates additive shaping from reward replacement and reward-adjacent guidance, and organises existing methods along temporal, informational, and theoretical dimensions. Using this framework, twelve method families are comparatively analysed. The framework further highlights the conditions under which optimality guarantees survive contemporary deep reinforcement learning pipelines, replay buffers, bootstrapped critics, and reward normalisation, while exposing the unresolved relationship between adaptation rate and learner stability.

Related papers

• Explicit Critic Guidance for Aligning Diffusion Models [27.6704888666835]
  We propose a state-aligned latent actor-critic framework for diffusion post-training.<n>Our method consistently outperforms prior group-relative RL and actor-critic baselines on single-reward and multi-reward benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T22:20:51Z)
• Alternating Reinforcement Learning with Contextual Rubric Rewards [2.1172256884504588]
  Reinforcement Learning with Rewards (RLRR) is a framework that extends conventional reinforcement learning from human feedback.<n>Existing approaches in RLRR are limited to linearly compressing vector rewards into a scalar reward with a fixed weightings.<n>This work proposes Alternating Reinforcement Learning with Rewards (ARL-RR) to overcome the limitations of reward aggregation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T04:18:39Z)
• Alternating Reinforcement Learning for Rubric-Based Reward Modeling in Non-Verifiable LLM Post-Training [29.56905427210088]
  gradient-ARM is a framework that jointly optimize a rubric generator and a judge using reinforcement learning from preference feedback.<n>We show that gradient-ARM achieves state-of-the-art performance among baselines on benchmarks and significantly improves downstream policy alignment in both offline and online reinforcement learning settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T00:50:53Z)
• Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning with LLMs: Formulation and Practices [61.361819972410046]
  We show why and under what conditions the true sequence-level reward can be optimized via a surrogate token-level objective in policy gradient methods such as REINFORCE.<n>This insight provides a principled explanation for the crucial role of several widely adopted techniques in stabilizing RL training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T07:45:39Z)
• Latent Chain-of-Thought for Visual Reasoning [53.541579327424046]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning is critical for improving the interpretability and reliability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>We reformulate reasoning in LVLMs as posterior inference and propose a scalable training algorithm based on amortized variational inference.<n>We empirically demonstrate that the proposed method enhances the state-of-the-art LVLMs on seven reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T23:10:06Z)
• OmniQuality-R: Advancing Reward Models Through All-Encompassing Quality Assessment [55.59322229889159]
  We propose OmniQuality-R, a unified reward modeling framework that transforms multi-task quality reasoning into continuous and interpretable reward signals.<n>We use a reasoning-enhanced reward modeling dataset to form a reliable chain-of-thought dataset for supervised fine-tuning.<n>We evaluate OmniQuality-R on three key IQA tasks: aesthetic quality assessment, technical quality evaluation, and text-image alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-12T13:46:28Z)
• Reinforcement Learning for Durable Algorithmic Recourse [49.54997446851335]
  We present a time-aware framework for algorithmic recourse, explicitly modeling how candidate populations adapt in response to recommendations.<n>We also introduce a novel reinforcement learning (RL)-based recourse algorithm that captures the evolving dynamics of the environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T09:24:12Z)
• Temporal-Difference Variational Continual Learning [77.92320830700797]
  We propose new learning objectives that integrate the regularization effects of multiple previous posterior estimations.<n>Our approach effectively mitigates Catastrophic Forgetting, outperforming strong Variational CL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T10:58:41Z)
• On Reward Structures of Markov Decision Processes [4.13365552362244]
  A Markov decision process can be parameterized by a transition kernel and a reward function. We study various kinds of "costs" associated with reinforcement learning inspired by the demands in robotic applications. We develop a novel estimator with an instance-specific error bound to $tildeO(sqrtfractau_sn)$ for estimating a single state value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T22:29:16Z)
• Robust Reinforcement Learning with Distributional Risk-averse formulation [1.2891210250935146]
  We approximate the Robust Reinforcement Learning constrained with a $Phi$-divergence using an approximate Risk-Averse formulation. We show that the classical Reinforcement Learning formulation can be robustified using standard deviation penalization of the objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-14T13:33:58Z)
• Learning Domain Adaptive Object Detection with Probabilistic Teacher [93.76128726257946]
  We present a simple yet effective framework, termed as Probabilistic Teacher (PT) PT aims to capture the uncertainty of unlabeled target data from a gradually evolving teacher and guides the learning of a student in a mutually beneficial manner. We also present a novel Entropy Focal Loss (EFL) to further facilitate the uncertainty-guided self-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-13T16:24:22Z)
• Temporal-Logic-Based Reward Shaping for Continuing Learning Tasks [57.17673320237597]
  In continuing tasks, average-reward reinforcement learning may be a more appropriate problem formulation than the more common discounted reward formulation. This paper presents the first reward shaping framework for average-reward learning. It proves that, under standard assumptions, the optimal policy under the original reward function can be recovered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T05:06:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.