Conversation as Measurement in Clinical Encounters: Observable Phase Structure, Partially Observable Patient State

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.08868v2
• Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 04:09:58 GMT
• Title: Conversation as Measurement in Clinical Encounters: Observable Phase Structure, Partially Observable Patient State
• Abstract summary: Many modern AI systems analyze conversational traces to infer aspects of human interaction and state, implicitly assuming that such information is recoverable from conversation.<n>We study observability of patient state and conversational phase structure using 439 real-world clinical encounter transcripts spanning 134 hours.
• Score: 20.171383449115652
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Many modern AI systems analyze conversational traces to infer aspects of human interaction and state, implicitly assuming that such information is recoverable from conversation. We study observability: whether a target is recoverable from conversational transcripts alone. Observability is difficult to assess because transcripts may provide only a partial view of many targets, and large-scale analysis requires model-based annotation, making true limits of the conversational signal hard to distinguish from annotator error. We therefore study clinical encounters, where patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide an external anchor for patient state, and visits follow broadly structured patterns. We study observability of patient state and conversational phase structure using 439 real-world clinical encounter transcripts spanning 134 hours, including 245 ENT transcripts paired with 273 PROM surveys. We operationalize patient state using PROM scores for voice, cough, and swallowing; phase structure using conversational phase segmentation. To make these analyses credible at scale, we use a PHI-compliant GPT-5 deployment for transcript annotation and conduct 40 hours of manual validation, reducing the risk that apparent limits of observability simply reflect annotator error. Our core finding is an observability asymmetry: phase structure is observable and useful for characterizing clinical encounter organization, while patient state is only partially observable, even in a setting designed to elicit patient symptoms and experiences, cautioning against transcript-only inference of human state.

Related papers

• Speech-to-SOAP: End-to-End Summarization of Medical Dialogues: KIT@BeTraC 2026 [62.221439619588914]
  We present KIT's submission to this years BeTraC challenge in the lightweight track.<n>Our main contribution is a scalable data augmentation pipeline that unifies heterogeneous medical dialogue datasets through synthetic speech generation and automatically generated SOAP supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T09:51:03Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models in Dynamic Clinical Decision-Making with Standardized Patient Cases [71.12461204050985]
  MedSP1000 is an SP-derived interactive benchmark for clinical-agent evaluation.<n>It converts peer-reviewed SP teaching cases into executable scenarios with defined SP case scripts, clinical environment contexts, and human-validated structured rubrics.<n>Applying MedSP1000 to a range of general-purpose and medically specialized LLMs, we find that performance on static benchmarks does not reliably translate to such educational scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T17:17:16Z)
• MedConceal: A Benchmark for Clinical Hidden-Concern Reasoning Under Partial Observability [17.806376792868416]
  We present MedConceal, a benchmark with an interactive patient simulator for evaluating hidden-concern reasoning in medical dialogue.<n>Built from clinician-answered online health discussions, each case pairs clinician-visible context with simulator-internal hidden concerns.<n>We study two abilities: confirmation, surfacing hidden concerns through multi-turn dialogue, and intervention, addressing the primary concern and guiding the patient toward a target plan.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T21:51:02Z)
• Agentic Cognitive Profiling: Realigning Automated Alzheimer's Disease Detection with Clinical Construct Validity [66.94391219005291]
  This paper proposes Agentic Cognitive Profiling (ACP), an agentic framework that realigns automated screening with clinical protocol logic.<n>Central to our design is decoupling semantic understanding from measurement by delegating all quantification to deterministic function calling.<n>ACP achieves 90.5% score match rate in task examination and 85.3% accuracy in AD prediction, surpassing popular baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T06:15:35Z)
• Continuous Telemonitoring of Heart Failure using Personalised Speech Dynamics [17.682803546212824]
  We propose a Longitudinal Intra-Patient Tracking (LIPT) scheme to capture the trajectory of relative symptomatic changes within individuals.<n>Central to this framework is a Sequential Personalised (PSE) which transforms longitudinal speech recordings into context-aware latent representations.<n> Experimental results from a cohort of 225 patients demonstrate that the LIPT paradigm significantly outperforms the classic cross-sectional approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T10:19:17Z)
• Reading Between the Lines: Combining Pause Dynamics and Semantic Coherence for Automated Assessment of Thought Disorder [8.239710313549466]
  This study integrates pause features with semantic coherence metrics across three datasets.<n>Key findings demonstrate that pause features alone robustly predict the severity of formal thought disorder (FTD)<n>These findings suggest that frameworks combining temporal and semantic analyses provide a roadmap for refining the assessment of disorganized speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T22:00:16Z)
• Dr-LLaVA: Visual Instruction Tuning with Symbolic Clinical Grounding [53.629132242389716]
  Vision-Language Models (VLM) can support clinicians by analyzing medical images and engaging in natural language interactions. VLMs often exhibit "hallucinogenic" behavior, generating textual outputs not grounded in contextual multimodal information. We propose a new alignment algorithm that uses symbolic representations of clinical reasoning to ground VLMs in medical knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T23:19:28Z)
• Exploring Speech Pattern Disorders in Autism using Machine Learning [12.469348589699766]
  This study presents a comprehensive approach to identify distinctive speech patterns through the analysis of examiner-patient dialogues. We extracted 40 speech-related features, categorized into frequency, zero-crossing rate, energy, spectral characteristics, Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) and balance. The classification model aimed to differentiate between ASD and non-ASD cases, achieving an accuracy of 87.75%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T02:59:15Z)
• Generating medically-accurate summaries of patient-provider dialogue: A multi-stage approach using large language models [6.252236971703546]
  An effective summary is required to be coherent and accurately capture all the medically relevant information in the dialogue. This paper tackles the problem of medical conversation summarization by discretizing the task into several smaller dialogue-understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T08:48:53Z)
• PriMock57: A Dataset Of Primary Care Mock Consultations [66.29154510369372]
  We detail the development of a public access, high quality dataset comprising of57 mocked primary care consultations. Our work illustrates how the dataset can be used as a benchmark for conversational medical ASR as well as consultation note generation from transcripts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-01T10:18:28Z)
• Self-supervised Answer Retrieval on Clinical Notes [68.87777592015402]
  We introduce CAPR, a rule-based self-supervision objective for training Transformer language models for domain-specific passage matching. We apply our objective in four Transformer-based architectures: Contextual Document Vectors, Bi-, Poly- and Cross-encoders. We report that CAPR outperforms strong baselines in the retrieval of domain-specific passages and effectively generalizes across rule-based and human-labeled passages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-02T10:42:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.