LexKairos: Benchmarking Legal Temporal Capabilities in LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09106v2
• Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:19:23 GMT
• Title: LexKairos: Benchmarking Legal Temporal Capabilities in LLMs
• Abstract summary: LexKairos is a benchmark for evaluating the temporal capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in the Chinese legal context.<n>Our results show that Gemini-3-Flash achieves the strongest overall performance, yet even the best-performing model exhibits notable limitations.
• Score: 11.625202652936869
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of legal tasks. In legal practice, time is a critical concept that governs the validity of statutes, the progression of legal cases, and the enforcement of procedural deadlines. However, legal temporal capabilities remain underexplored in existing legal AI benchmarks. To address this gap, we propose LexKairos, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the temporal capabilities of LLMs in the Chinese legal context across three dimensions: statutory temporal knowledge, case temporal modeling, and statute-case temporal reasoning. LexKairos comprises nine sub-tasks drawn from real-world Chinese judicial cases and statutes. We conduct systematic evaluations of eight LLMs under multiple inference settings, including vanilla, Chain-of-Thought (CoT), and thinking modes. Our results show that Gemini-3-Flash achieves the strongest overall performance, yet even the best-performing model exhibits notable limitations on tasks demanding precise time-sensitive statutory metadata recall or complex reasoning in time limits, indicating that legal temporal knowledge and reasoning remain open challenges for current LLMs. Data and code are available at https://github.com/thunlp/LexKairos.

Related papers

• Can LLMs Time Travel? Enhancing Temporal Consistency in Legal Agentic Search through Reinforcement Learning [45.13302016493955]
  Law must match the temporal context of each case, as retroactive application of statutes violates core legal principles and leads to erroneous conclusions.<n>Our observations reveal that current legal LLMs suffer from temporal bias anchored to their training cutoff, while search agents rarely incorporate temporal constraints into queries.<n>We propose LegalSearch-R1, an end-to-end reinforcement learning framework that pairs local statute RAG for precise article matching with online web search for broader legal knowledge, trained on temporally-indexed data spanning multiple amendment periods to enforce temporal consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T14:57:13Z)
• TriBench-Ko: Evaluating LLM Risks in Judicial Workflows [10.833772229369226]
  TriBench-Ko is a Korean benchmark designed to evaluate potential deployment risks of large language models.<n>It covers four core tasks: summarization, precedent retrieval, legal issue extraction, and evidence analysis.<n>It jointly assesses model behavior across multiple deployment risk categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-05T14:20:28Z)
• LegalOne: A Family of Foundation Models for Reliable Legal Reasoning [54.57434222018289]
  We present LegalOne, a family of foundational models specifically tailored for the Chinese legal domain.<n>LegalOne is developed through a comprehensive three-phase pipeline designed to master legal reasoning.<n>We publicly release the LegalOne weights and the LegalKit evaluation framework to advance the field of Legal AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T10:18:32Z)
• PLawBench: A Rubric-Based Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Real-World Legal Practice [67.71760070255425]
  We introduce PLawBench, a practical benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in legal practice scenarios.<n>PLawBench comprises 850 questions across 13 practical legal scenarios, with each question accompanied by expert-designed evaluation rubrics.<n>Using an LLM-based evaluator aligned with human expert judgments, we evaluate 10 state-of-the-art LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T11:36:10Z)
• LexGenius: An Expert-Level Benchmark for Large Language Models in Legal General Intelligence [74.05988707492058]
  Legal general intelligence (GI) refers to artificial intelligence (AI) that encompasses legal understanding, reasoning, and decision-making.<n>Existing benchmarks are result-oriented and fail to systematically evaluate the legal intelligence of large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose LexGenius, an expert-level Chinese legal benchmark for evaluating legal GI in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T08:48:02Z)
• CLaw: Benchmarking Chinese Legal Knowledge in Large Language Models - A Fine-grained Corpus and Reasoning Analysis [13.067377421250557]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly tasked with analyzing legal texts and citing relevant statutes.<n>This paper introduces CLaw, a novel benchmark specifically engineered to meticulously evaluate LLMs on Chinese legal knowledge and its application in reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T14:19:51Z)
• LegalAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents in Legal Domain [53.70993264644004]
  LegalAgentBench is a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLM Agents in the Chinese legal domain.<n>LegalAgentBench includes 17 corpora from real-world legal scenarios and provides 37 tools for interacting with external knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-23T04:02:46Z)
• LexEval: A Comprehensive Chinese Legal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models [17.90483181611453]
  Large language models (LLMs) have made significant progress in natural language processing tasks and demonstrate considerable potential in the legal domain. Applying existing LLMs to legal systems without careful evaluation of their potential and limitations could pose significant risks in legal practice. We introduce a standardized comprehensive Chinese legal benchmark LexEval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T13:44:00Z)
• A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Legal Judgment Prediction [60.70089334782383]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated great potential for domain-specific applications. Recent disputes over GPT-4's law evaluation raise questions concerning their performance in real-world legal tasks. We design practical baseline solutions based on LLMs and test on the task of legal judgment prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T07:38:04Z)
• LAiW: A Chinese Legal Large Language Models Benchmark [17.66376880475554]
  General and legal domain LLMs have demonstrated strong performance in various tasks of LegalAI. We are the first to build the Chinese legal LLMs benchmark LAiW, based on the logic of legal practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T11:19:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.