An Agentic Generative Large Language Model for Treatment Planning of Colorectal Cancer
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09142v1
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 05:42:03 GMT
- Title: An Agentic Generative Large Language Model for Treatment Planning of Colorectal Cancer
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) show promise in many diagnostic tasks, but their adoption for high-stakes treatment planning is hindered by complex reasoning.<n>We present GatorOnco, an agentic LLM for colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment planning.<n>We implemented a domain-adaptation method that integrates pre-training, model merging, a two-stage post-training approach, and agent-based reinforcement learning.
- Score: 27.52451737115757
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Treatment planning in precision oncology requires synthesizing heterogeneous patient information with rapidly evolving clinical guidelines to ensure guideline-concordant care. While large language models (LLMs) show promise in many diagnostic tasks, their adoption for high-stakes treatment planning is hindered by complex reasoning, adherence to timely clinical guidelines, and safety concerns. In this study, we present GatorOnco, an agentic LLM for colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment planning. GatorOnco is developed using a total of 282 billion tokens of biomedical text, including healthcare system-scale clinical text comprising 166 billion tokens from UF Health. We implemented a domain-adaptation method that integrates pre-training, model merging, a two-stage post-training approach, and agent-based reinforcement learning. An agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approach dynamically integrates time-sensitive clinical guidelines into the reasoning process. In a blind, randomized clinical evaluation conducted by five UF Health oncologists, GatorOnco significantly outperformed open-source LLMs (P < 0.01) and achieved expert-level performance comparable to UF Health oncologists. Compared with expert oncologists, GatorOnco received significantly higher ratings for readability (4.46 vs. 4.19, P < 0.01) and completeness (3.91 vs. 3.52, P < 0.01), while showing statistically comparable performance in correctness (4.09 vs. 4.11, P = 0.921), currency (4.04 vs. 3.98, P = 0.478), and safety (4.22 vs. 4.22, P = 0.999). These findings demonstrate that integrating agentic reasoning with large-scale domain adaptation can help bridge the gap for generative AI in high-stakes cancer treatment planning.
Related papers
- An AI agent for treatment reasoning over a biomedical tool universe [35.05540785374698]
We introduce ATHENA-R1, an AI agent for treatment reasoning across all FDA approved drugs since 1939.<n>ATHENA-R1 is trained by reinforcement learning over a universe of 212 biomedical tools.<n>It reaches 94.7% accuracy on open-ended drug reasoning and 82.9% on treatment reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-27T02:24:56Z) - TxBench-PP: Analyzing AI Agent Performance on Small-Molecule Preclinical Pharmacology [0.0]
Artificial intelligence (AI) agents promise to accelerate drug discovery by compressing interpretation and decision-making loops.<n>We introduce TherapeuticsBench Preclinical Pharmacology (TxBench-PP), a verifiable benchmark for small-molecule preclinical pharmacology.<n>TxBench-PP tests whether agents can recover accurate conclusions from real-world assay data rather than memorized facts from literature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T16:23:45Z) - Evaluating Large Language Models in Dynamic Clinical Decision-Making with Standardized Patient Cases [71.12461204050985]
MedSP1000 is an SP-derived interactive benchmark for clinical-agent evaluation.<n>It converts peer-reviewed SP teaching cases into executable scenarios with defined SP case scripts, clinical environment contexts, and human-validated structured rubrics.<n>Applying MedSP1000 to a range of general-purpose and medically specialized LLMs, we find that performance on static benchmarks does not reliably translate to such educational scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-03T17:17:16Z) - Eliciting Medical Reasoning with Knowledge-enhanced Data Synthesis: A Semi-Supervised Reinforcement Learning Approach [62.0906177191353]
Existing approaches distill chain-of-thought reasoning traces from large proprietary models via supervised fine-tuning, then conduct reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We propose MedSSR, a Medical Knowledge-enhanced data Synthesis and Semi-supervised Reinforcement learning framework.<n>Our framework first employs rare disease knowledge to synthesize distribution-controllable reasoning questions.<n>We then utilize the policy model itself to generate high-quality pseudo-labels. This enables a two-stage, intrinsic-to-extrinsic training paradigm: self-supervised RL on the pseudo-labeled data, followed by supervised RL on the human-annotated real data
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-13T14:37:38Z) - Clinical Reasoning AI for Oncology Treatment Planning: A Multi-Specialty Case-Based Evaluation [0.7695487047291749]
More than 80% of U.S. cancer care is delivered in community settings.<n>Clinicians must integrate genomics, staging, pathology, and changing guidelines, creating cognitive burden.<n>We evaluated OncoBrain, an AI clinical reasoning platform for oncology treatmentplan generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-27T00:26:05Z) - A Federated and Parameter-Efficient Framework for Large Language Model Training in Medicine [59.78991974851707]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on medical benchmarks, including question answering and diagnosis.<n>Most medical LLMs are trained on data from a single institution, which faces limitations in generalizability and safety in heterogeneous systems.<n>We introduce the model-agnostic and parameter-efficient federated learning framework for adapting LLMs to medical applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T18:48:21Z) - CLIN-LLM: A Safety-Constrained Hybrid Framework for Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment Generation [0.31984926651189866]
Large language model (LLM)-based systems often lack medical grounding and fail to quantify uncertainty.<n>We propose CLIN-LLM, a safety-constrained hybrid pipeline that integrates multimodal patient encoding, uncertainty-calibrated disease classification, and retrieval-augmented treatment generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-26T10:11:53Z) - DispatchMAS: Fusing taxonomy and artificial intelligence agents for emergency medical services [49.70819009392778]
Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) offer opportunities to augment dispatchers.<n>This study aimed to develop and evaluate a taxonomy-grounded, multi-agent system for simulating realistic scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-24T08:01:21Z) - Organ-Agents: Virtual Human Physiology Simulator via LLMs [66.40796430669158]
Organ-Agents is a multi-agent framework that simulates human physiology via LLM-driven agents.<n>We curated data from 7,134 sepsis patients and 7,895 controls, generating high-resolution trajectories across 9 systems and 125 variables.<n>Organ-Agents achieved high simulation accuracy on 4,509 held-out patients, with per-system MSEs 0.16 and robustness across SOFA-based severity strata.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-20T01:58:45Z) - How Well Can Modern LLMs Act as Agent Cores in Radiology Environments? [54.36730060680139]
RadA-BenchPlat is an evaluation platform that benchmarks the performance of large language models (LLMs) in radiology environments.<n>The platform also defines ten categories of tools for agent-driven task solving and evaluates seven leading LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-12T18:20:16Z) - QuaLLM-Health: An Adaptation of an LLM-Based Framework for Quantitative Data Extraction from Online Health Discussions [30.089810404792]
We present an adapted framework from QuaLLM into QuaLLM-Health for extracting clinically relevant quantitative data from unstructured text.<n>We collected 410k posts and comments from five GLP-1-related communities using the Reddit API in July 2024.<n>Applying the framework to the full dataset enabled efficient extraction of variables necessary for downstream analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-27T00:52:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.