The Unseen Delta: Characterizing the Compiler Optimization Landscape via Top-Down Differential Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09530v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 12:32:19 GMT
• Title: The Unseen Delta: Characterizing the Compiler Optimization Landscape via Top-Down Differential Analysis
• Abstract summary: We introduce a top-down differential analysis methodology to analyze compiler optimization differences.<n>We find substantial and often surprising performance differences between binaries generated by GCC and Clang.<n>We develop a binary patching framework that fixes identified performance issues by transplanting superior code sequences from competing compilers.
• Score: 13.066542287825113
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Compiler optimizations are essential for achieving high performance in modern software. However, recent studies highlight the persistence of performance bugs, i.e., subtle defects where the compiler generates functionally correct but computationally inefficient code, leading to significant performance degradation. Existing detection and testing methods typically employ a bottom-up approach, focusing on specific low-level code properties and remaining confined to known optimization rules. Consequently, they struggle to quantify the holistic impact of identified issues and often overlook critical microarchitectural inefficiencies. We observe a key indicator of untapped potential: different compilers often produce binaries with significant performance differences for identical source code. However, the root causes of these discrepancies remain largely unexplored and difficult to pinpoint using current techniques. To bridge this gap, we introduce a top-down differential analysis methodology. This approach calibrates compiler optimization differences with fine-grained, hierarchical microarchitectural metrics, offering a comprehensive view of runtime behavior. Using a sampling-based approach, this method efficiently pinpoints the critical code snippets responsible for performance differences, enabling targeted root cause analysis. Our empirical evaluation uncovers substantial and often surprising performance differences between binaries generated by GCC and Clang. A categorization of root causes reveals systemic challenges in compiler optimizations. To quantitatively validate our findings and demonstrate practical impact, we developed a binary patching framework that fixes identified performance issues by transplanting superior code sequences from competing compilers. This work provides a novel lens for understanding and analyzing optimization defects.

Related papers

• Dynamic analysis enhances issue resolution [53.50448142467294]
  DAIRA (Dynamic Analysis-enhanced Issue Resolution Agent) is an automated repair framework that embeds dynamic analysis into the agent's reasoning cycle.<n> Driven by a Test Tracing-Driven methodology, DAIRA utilizes lightweight monitors to extract critical runtime data.<n>When powered by Gemini 3 Flash Preview, DAIRA establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, achieving a 79.4% resolution rate on the SWE-bench Verified dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T14:48:54Z)
• AlgoVeri: An Aligned Benchmark for Verified Code Generation on Classical Algorithms [54.99368693313797]
  Existing benchmarks test only individual languages/tools, so the performance numbers are not directly comparable.<n>We address this gap with AlgoVeri, a benchmark that evaluates vericoding of $77$ classical algorithms in Dafny, Verus, and Lean.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T06:58:26Z)
• Efficient Differentiable Causal Discovery via Reliable Super-Structure Learning [51.20606796019663]
  We propose ALVGL, a novel and general enhancement to the differentiable causal discovery pipeline.<n>ALVGL employs a sparse and low-rank decomposition to learn the precision matrix of the data.<n>We show that ALVGL not only achieves state-of-the-art accuracy but also significantly improves optimization efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T02:18:59Z)
• Optimization-Aware Test Generation for Deep Learning Compilers [18.99078574014009]
  OATest is a novel approach for synthesizing optimization-aware computational graphs.<n>It can detect more bugs and achieve higher code coverage in TVM and ONNXRutimes.<n> OATest uncovers 58 previously unknown bugs, 36 of which have been confirmed or fixed by developers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-24T09:27:59Z)
• How Different Tokenization Algorithms Impact LLMs and Transformer Models for Binary Code Analysis [0.0]
  Despite its significance, tokenization in the context of assembly code remains an underexplored area.<n>We explore preprocessing customization options and pre-tokenization rules tailored to the unique characteristics of assembly code.<n>We compare tokenizers based on tokenization efficiency, vocabulary compression, and representational fidelity for assembly code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T19:45:26Z)
• QiMeng-NeuComBack: Self-Evolving Translation from IR to Assembly Code [52.66657751895655]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a compelling new paradigm: Neural Compilation.<n>This paper introduces NeuComBack, a novel benchmark dataset specifically designed for IR-to-assembly compilation.<n>We propose a self-evolving prompt optimization method that enables LLMs to evolve their internal prompt strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-03T03:20:26Z)
• Leveraging Neural Graph Compilers in Machine Learning Research for Edge-Cloud Systems [5.241450170761232]
  This work presents a comprehensive evaluation of neural network graph compilers across heterogeneous hardware platforms.<n>Our systematic analysis reveals that graph compilers exhibit performance patterns highly dependent on both neural architecture and batch sizes.<n>We introduce novel metrics to quantify a compiler's ability to mitigate performance friction as batch size increases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T19:02:16Z)
• Compiler Optimization Testing Based on Optimization-Guided Equivalence Transformations [3.2987550056134873]
  We propose a metamorphic testing approach inspired by compiler optimizations.<n>Our approach first employs tailored code construction strategies to generate input programs that satisfy optimization conditions.<n>By comparing the outputs of pre- and post-transformation programs, this approach effectively identifies incorrect optimization bugs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-06T01:37:57Z)
• Beyond the Edge of Function: Unraveling the Patterns of Type Recovery in Binary Code [55.493408628371235]
  We propose ByteTR, a framework for recovering variable types in binary code.<n>In light of the ubiquity of variable propagation across functions, ByteTR conducts inter-procedural analysis to trace variable propagation and employs a gated graph neural network to capture long-range data flow dependencies for variable type recovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T12:27:05Z)
• A Theoretical Perspective for Speculative Decoding Algorithm [60.79447486066416]
  One effective way to accelerate inference is emphSpeculative Decoding, which employs a small model to sample a sequence of draft tokens and a large model to validate. This paper tackles this gap by conceptualizing the decoding problem via markov chain abstraction and studying the key properties, emphoutput quality and inference acceleration, from a theoretical perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T01:53:04Z)
• Comparative Code Structure Analysis using Deep Learning for Performance Prediction [18.226950022938954]
  This paper aims to assess the feasibility of using purely static information (e.g., abstract syntax tree or AST) of applications to predict performance change based on the change in code structure. Our evaluations of several deep embedding learning methods demonstrate that tree-based Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models can leverage the hierarchical structure of source-code to discover latent representations and achieve up to 84% (individual problem) and 73% (combined dataset with multiple of problems) accuracy in predicting the change in performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T16:59:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.