Co-Evolution in Agentic Systems: Toward Self-Directed Evolution Beyond Human Design
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10299v1
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 23:10:40 GMT
- Title: Co-Evolution in Agentic Systems: Toward Self-Directed Evolution Beyond Human Design
- Abstract summary: This survey focuses on co-evolution in agentic systems, a multi-component form of self-evolution in which multiple agents and their environment impose adaptive pressure on one another.<n>To organize existing papers, we propose a progressive three-stage taxonomy that traces how the system gradually sheds human-engineered constraints.
- Score: 55.30329388138526
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Agentic systems are increasingly expected to improve after deployment, yet single-entity self-evolution is often bounded by a static learning context, such as fixed tasks and feedback. This survey focuses on co-evolution in agentic systems, a multi-component form of self-evolution in which multiple agents and their environment impose adaptive pressure on one another. To organize existing papers, we propose a progressive three-stage taxonomy that traces how the system gradually sheds human-engineered constraints. Agent--Agent Co-Evolution studies how agents adapt through dynamic peers, including adversarial, collaborative, and organizational adaptation. Agent--Environment Co-Evolution extends this loop to adaptive tasks, feedback, and interaction spaces that change with the agents. Meta Co-Evolution further explores the possibility of making the evolution mechanism itself evolvable. We also discuss open challenges in evaluating such systems, scaling them across multiple components, and keeping increasingly autonomous evolutionary processes safe and controllable. This survey provides a unified foundation for building robust and open-ended agentic systems that can improve beyond fixed human-designed paths.
Related papers
- Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems [65.90791804095561]
Multi-agent systems address this through structured collaboration among specialized agents, but tighter coordination amplifies a less explored risk.<n>Existing surveys cover individual agent capabilities, multi-agent collaboration, or agent self-evolution separately, leaving the causal dependencies among them unexamined.<n>This survey provides a unified review organized around four causally linked stages, which we term the LIFE progression: Lay the capability foundation, Integrate agents through collaboration, Find faults through attribution, and Evolve through autonomous self-improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-14T14:36:13Z) - Harnessing Agentic Evolution [32.567492765277855]
Agentic evolution is a powerful paradigm for improving programs, iteration, and scientific solutions by iteratively generating candidates, evaluating them, and using feedback to guide future search.<n>Existing methods are typically instantiated either as fixed hand-designed procedures that are modular but rigid, or as general-purpose agents that flexibly integrate feedback but can drift in long-horizon evolution.<n>We introduce AEvo, a harnessed meta-editing framework in which a meta-agent observes this state and acts not by directly proposing the next candidate, but by editing the procedure or agent context that controls future evolution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-13T17:45:16Z) - Evolutionary Ensemble of Agents [7.465452178698495]
We introduce EvE, a decentralized framework that organizes coding agents into a live, co-evolving system for algorithmic discovery.<n>By maintaining two co-evolving populations, EvE evaluates agents through a synchronous race, updating their empirical Elo ratings.<n>Compared to variants driven by a fixed initial agent or even a frozen "best-evolved" agent, EvE uniquely avoids phase mismatch.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-09T15:56:10Z) - Your Agent May Misevolve: Emergent Risks in Self-evolving LLM Agents [58.69865074060139]
We study the case where an agent's self-evolution deviates in unintended ways, leading to undesirable or even harmful outcomes.<n>Our empirical findings reveal that misevolution is a widespread risk, affecting agents built even on top-tier LLMs.<n>We discuss potential mitigation strategies to inspire further research on building safer and more trustworthy self-evolving agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-30T14:55:55Z) - A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems [53.37728204835912]
Most existing AI systems rely on manually crafted configurations that remain static after deployment.<n>Recent research has explored agent evolution techniques that aim to automatically enhance agent systems based on interaction data and environmental feedback.<n>This survey aims to provide researchers and practitioners with a systematic understanding of self-evolving AI agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-10T16:07:32Z) - A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: On Path to Artificial Super Intelligence [87.08051686357206]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities but remain fundamentally static.<n>As LLMs are increasingly deployed in open-ended, interactive environments, this static nature has become a critical bottleneck.<n>This survey provides the first systematic and comprehensive review of self-evolving agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-28T17:59:05Z) - Agent Alignment in Evolving Social Norms [65.45423591744434]
We propose an evolutionary framework for agent evolution and alignment, named EvolutionaryAgent.
In an environment where social norms continuously evolve, agents better adapted to the current social norms will have a higher probability of survival and proliferation.
We show that EvolutionaryAgent can align progressively better with the evolving social norms while maintaining its proficiency in general tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-09T15:44:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.