Hierarchical Empirical-Bayes Naive Bayes: Minimax Smoothing and Calibration with AODE Extension
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11162v1
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:21:31 GMT
- Title: Hierarchical Empirical-Bayes Naive Bayes: Minimax Smoothing and Calibration with AODE Extension
- Abstract summary: We propose hierarchical empirical-Bayes Naive Bayes (HEB-NB)<n>Each class-feature conditional probability is smoothed by a Dirichlet prior whose concentration is learned data-adaptively.<n>Across 31 UCI and OpenML benchmarks, HEB-NB attains the best average Friedman rank on probabilistic metrics.
- Score: 2.423836984571605
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The Naive Bayes (NB) classifier remains a standard choice for categorical data, yet its widely used smoothing rules, such as Laplace, Lidstone, Krichevsky-Trofimov, and the $m$-estimate, all prescribe a fixed smoothing strength that ignores feature cardinality, sample size, and class imbalance, inducing a non-vanishing bias on modern high-cardinality tabular data. We propose hierarchical empirical-Bayes Naive Bayes (HEB-NB), in which each class-feature conditional probability is smoothed by a Dirichlet prior whose concentration is learned data-adaptively via Type-II maximum likelihood, enabling principled information sharing across classes while retaining closed-form inference. We further introduce HEB average one-dependence estimators (HEB-AODE), showing that the adaptive smoothing transfers cleanly to structural relaxations of NB. Theoretically, we establish a non-asymptotic $\ell_1$ error bound for HEB-NB matching the empirical-distribution minimax rate plus a vanishing data-adaptive bias, together with a matching Laplace-tight lower bound that yields a finite-sample, risk-level strict separation from Laplace. We further derive a plug-in excess Bayes-risk bound via total-variation tensorization and a population top-1 expected calibration error (ECE) corollary. Empirically, across 31 UCI and OpenML benchmarks, HEB-NB attains the best average Friedman rank on probabilistic metrics, with up to 22.1% log-loss reductions on high-cardinality datasets and consistent improvements of HEB-AODE over vanilla AODE. Combining HEB-NB with mutual-information weighting reduces top-1 ECE by 41%-70%, demonstrating substantial gains in probabilistic accuracy and calibration.
Related papers
- The Role of Gradient Modification in Heavy-Tailed Nonconvex Stochastic Min-Max Optimization [50.59470683896735]
min-max optimization has attracted increasing attention due to its applications in modern machine learning.<n>We provide a comprehensive theoretical of gradient descent (SGDA)<n>We develop new clipping-free algorithms, i.e., Stoc-GDAM and Stoc-TRmax, and they both can achieve the optimal dependence on the target accuracy without using gradient clipping.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-05T12:49:28Z) - K-ABENA: K-Adaptive Backpropagation with Error-based N-exclusion Algorithm : (Compensated Loss-Based Sample Exclusion with Unbiased Gradient Estimation) [0.0]
K-ABENAK-Adaptive Backpropagation with Error-based N-exclusion is a selective computation framework.<n>It reduces per-it computation training cost by excluding a fraction of low-loss ("minor") observations.<n>It collapses to 0.386 accuracy under label limitation (baseline: 0.832) and to 0.53 AUC under extreme imbalance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-07T06:58:51Z) - Functional Bilevel Optimization for Predictive Fairness [25.649081304879218]
We consider mean demographic parity through DPVar, the variance of the conditional-mean prediction given the sensitive attribute, and show that optimizing it yields a functional bilevel problem.<n>We propose two algorithms for this problem: FBO, which uses a closed-form adjoint we derive for the squared-loss case to obtain an exact hypergradient, and ITD, which differentiates through unrolled inner steps and extends beyond squared loss.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-06T13:56:16Z) - Direct Bethe Free Energy Minimization for Bayesian Neural Network [0.0]
We propose training Bayesian neural networks by directly minimizing the Bethe free energy rather than maximizing a variational lower bound.<n>On tree-structured factor graphs the Bethe free energy is exact; deterministic layers drop out of the objective and are trained by standard backpropagation.<n>All variants admit a closed-form predictive at MAP-equivalent inference cost, in contrast to ensemble and sampling-based methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-08T20:12:48Z) - Classifier Calibration at Scale: An Empirical Study of Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Methods [0.0]
We study model-agnostic post-hoc calibration methods to improve probabilistic predictions in supervised binary classification.<n>We benchmark 21 widely used classifiers, including linear models, SVMs, tree ensembles (CatBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM)<n>We find that commonly used calibration procedures, most notably Platt scaling and isotonic regression, can systematically degrade proper scoring performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-19T18:23:36Z) - Unregularized Linear Convergence in Zero-Sum Game from Preference Feedback [50.89125374999765]
We provide the first convergence guarantee for Optimistic Multiplicative Weights Update ($mathtOMWU$) in NLHF.<n>Our analysis identifies a novel marginal convergence behavior, where the probability of rarely played actions grows exponentially from exponentially small values.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-31T12:08:29Z) - Minimum-Risk Recalibration of Classifiers [9.31067660373791]
We introduce the concept of minimum-risk recalibration within the framework of mean-squared-error decomposition.
We show that transferring a calibrated classifier requires significantly fewer target samples compared to recalibrating from scratch.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T11:27:02Z) - On the Double Descent of Random Features Models Trained with SGD [78.0918823643911]
We study properties of random features (RF) regression in high dimensions optimized by gradient descent (SGD)
We derive precise non-asymptotic error bounds of RF regression under both constant and adaptive step-size SGD setting.
We observe the double descent phenomenon both theoretically and empirically.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-13T17:47:39Z) - Near-optimal inference in adaptive linear regression [60.08422051718195]
Even simple methods like least squares can exhibit non-normal behavior when data is collected in an adaptive manner.
We propose a family of online debiasing estimators to correct these distributional anomalies in at least squares estimation.
We demonstrate the usefulness of our theory via applications to multi-armed bandit, autoregressive time series estimation, and active learning with exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-05T21:05:11Z) - Evaluating State-of-the-Art Classification Models Against Bayes
Optimality [106.50867011164584]
We show that we can compute the exact Bayes error of generative models learned using normalizing flows.
We use our approach to conduct a thorough investigation of state-of-the-art classification models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T06:21:20Z) - Amortized Conditional Normalized Maximum Likelihood: Reliable Out of
Distribution Uncertainty Estimation [99.92568326314667]
We propose the amortized conditional normalized maximum likelihood (ACNML) method as a scalable general-purpose approach for uncertainty estimation.
Our algorithm builds on the conditional normalized maximum likelihood (CNML) coding scheme, which has minimax optimal properties according to the minimum description length principle.
We demonstrate that ACNML compares favorably to a number of prior techniques for uncertainty estimation in terms of calibration on out-of-distribution inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-05T08:04:34Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.