ConVAWG: A Retrieval-Grounded Framework for Controlled Synthetic Dialogue Generation in Violence Against Women and Girls
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11200v1
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:57:34 GMT
- Title: ConVAWG: A Retrieval-Grounded Framework for Controlled Synthetic Dialogue Generation in Violence Against Women and Girls
- Abstract summary: We introduce ConVAWG, a retrieval-grounded framework for generating CPS-aligned synthetic VAWG chat dialogues.<n>We release over 6,000 multi-turn dialogue events across 200 scenarios with rich scenario-, event-, and turn-level metadata.
- Score: 10.338756343367004
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Synthetic dialogue generation offers a way to study conversational dynamics in sensitive domains where real data are difficult to access, release, or annotate. The underlying abuse may occur online or offline: threats and coercion can appear directly in messages, while behaviours such as surveillance, isolation, stalking, and physical violence may be planned, disclosed, or referred to conversationally. Privacy and legal constraints make it difficult the release of large-scale real conversation datasets; existing work has mostly focused on sentence-level toxicity of online abuses, leaving a gap in modelling abuse as a relational and temporally unfolding phenomenon. In this work, we focus on modelling Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) scenarios as multi-turn dialogues. We introduce ConVAWG, a retrieval-grounded framework for generating CPS-aligned synthetic VAWG chat dialogues. ConVAWG builds scenarios from persona seeds, demographic patterns reported by the UK Office for National Statistics, official crime definitions, and retrieved Domestic Homicide Review cases; converts them into hierarchical event timelines; generates multi-scene role-play dialogues; and applies targeted activation-steered toxicity control to appropriate utterances. We release over 6,000 multi-turn dialogue events across 200 scenarios with rich scenario-, event-, and turn-level metadata. Extensive human evaluation, LLM-as-Judge assessment, ablations, and downstream tasks show strong dialogue quality and domain fidelity.
Related papers
- CATCH-ME if you RAG: a dataset of Contextually Annotated multi-Turn Counterspeech against Hate and Misinformation Exchanges [9.965670989893267]
We introduce the first large-scale, expert-curated, multilingual dataset of dialogues tackling the intersection of hate and misinformation.<n> Covering five languages and targeting hate directed at seven marginalized groups, this novel resource enables the training and evaluation of more persuasive, factually grounded counterspeech models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-18T15:32:14Z) - SNAP: A Plan-Driven Framework for Controllable Interactive Narrative Generation [0.23814052021083346]
We propose SNAP (Story and Narrative-based Agent with Planning), a framework that structures into Cells with explicit Plans to prevent narrative drift in web environments.<n> SNAP enables coherent scenario-consistent dialogues while adapting to diverse user responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-18T03:03:19Z) - Aligning Spoken Dialogue Models from User Interactions [55.192134724622235]
We propose a novel preference alignment framework to improve spoken dialogue models on realtime conversations from user interactions.<n>We create a dataset of more than 150,000 preference pairs from raw multi-turn speech conversations annotated with AI feedback.<n>Our findings shed light on the importance of a well-calibrated balance among various dynamics, crucial for natural real-time speech dialogue systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-26T16:45:20Z) - Personalized Attacks of Social Engineering in Multi-turn Conversations: LLM Agents for Simulation and Detection [19.604708321391012]
Social engineering (SE) attacks on social media platforms pose a significant risk.<n>We propose an LLM-agentic framework, SE-VSim, to simulate SE attack mechanisms by generating multi-turn conversations.<n>We present a proof of concept, SE-OmniGuard, to offer personalized protection to users by leveraging prior knowledge of the victims personality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-18T19:14:44Z) - REALTALK: A 21-Day Real-World Dataset for Long-Term Conversation [51.97224538045096]
We introduce REALTALK, a 21-day corpus of authentic messaging app dialogues.<n>We compare EI attributes and persona consistency to understand the challenges posed by real-world dialogues.<n>Our findings reveal that models struggle to simulate a user solely from dialogue history, while fine-tuning on specific user chats improves persona emulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T20:29:01Z) - You need to MIMIC to get FAME: Solving Meeting Transcript Scarcity with a Multi-Agent Conversations [6.742996385032372]
FAME is a dataset of 500 meetings in English and 300 in German produced by MIMIC.<n>It generates meeting transcripts on a given knowledge source by defining psychologically grounded participant profiles.<n>A modular post-processing step refines these outputs, mitigating potential repetitiveness and overly formal tones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T16:21:22Z) - ChatSOP: An SOP-Guided MCTS Planning Framework for Controllable LLM Dialogue Agents [52.7201882529976]
We propose SOP-guided Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) planning framework to enhance controllability of dialogue agents.<n>To enable this, we curate a dataset comprising SOP-annotated multi-scenario dialogues, generated using a semi-automated role-playing system with GPT-4o.<n>We also propose a novel method that integrates Chain of Thought reasoning with supervised fine-tuning for SOP prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-04T12:23:02Z) - Does Collaborative Human-LM Dialogue Generation Help Information
Extraction from Human Dialogues? [55.28340832822234]
Problem-solving human dialogues in real applications can be much more complex than existing Wizard-of-Oz collections.
We introduce a human-in-the-loop dialogue generation framework capable of synthesizing realistic dialogues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-13T20:02:50Z) - Controllable Mixed-Initiative Dialogue Generation through Prompting [50.03458333265885]
Mixed-initiative dialogue tasks involve repeated exchanges of information and conversational control.
Agents gain control by generating responses that follow particular dialogue intents or strategies, prescribed by a policy planner.
Standard approach has been fine-tuning pre-trained language models to perform generation conditioned on these intents.
We instead prompt large language models as a drop-in replacement to fine-tuning on conditional generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-06T23:11:25Z) - Automatic Evaluation and Moderation of Open-domain Dialogue Systems [59.305712262126264]
A long standing challenge that bothers the researchers is the lack of effective automatic evaluation metrics.
This paper describes the data, baselines and results obtained for the Track 5 at the Dialogue System Technology Challenge 10 (DSTC10)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-03T10:08:05Z) - Meta Dialogue Policy Learning [58.045067703675095]
We propose Deep Transferable Q-Network (DTQN) to utilize shareable low-level signals between domains.
We decompose the state and action representation space into feature subspaces corresponding to these low-level components.
In experiments, our model outperforms baseline models in terms of both success rate and dialogue efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-03T23:53:06Z) - Non-Autoregressive Dialog State Tracking [122.2328875457225]
We propose a novel framework of Non-Autoregressive Dialog State Tracking (NADST)
NADST can factor in potential dependencies among domains and slots to optimize the models towards better prediction of dialogue states as a complete set rather than separate slots.
Our results show that our model achieves the state-of-the-art joint accuracy across all domains on the MultiWOZ 2.1 corpus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-19T06:39:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.