GUIDE: Governed Unified Intelligence for Document-to-Artifact Generation in Enterprise Settings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12133v1
• Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 14:52:33 GMT
• Title: GUIDE: Governed Unified Intelligence for Document-to-Artifact Generation in Enterprise Settings
• Abstract summary: GUIDE is a governed multi-agent framework built on a shared versioned rule store with schema-validated inter-agent contracts.<n>Six specialized agents handle parsing, VLM-driven extraction, consistency checking, evaluation, human-in-the-loop (HITL) escalation, and persona-tailored artifact synthesis.<n>evaluated on 120 real-world enterprise guideline documents, GUIDE achieves 96% document success, extracts 3,896 rules with 71.4% auto-approved, produces 812 deployment-ready artifacts, and reduces turnaround to 40-125 minutes per document.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Enterprise guideline documents are heterogeneous and multimodal, combining narrative text, complex tables, and embedded images. Existing LLM and VLM systems face hallucinated content, table structure degradation, and lack governed workflows extending beyond extraction to validation and artifact generation. This leaves enterprises to perform this manually, consuming 2-3 days per document. To address this, we introduce GUIDE, a governed multi-agent framework built on a shared versioned rule store with schema-validated inter-agent contracts and end-to-end provenance tracking. Six specialized agents handle parsing, VLM-driven extraction, consistency checking, evaluation, human-in-the-loop (HITL) escalation, and persona-tailored artifact synthesis. Evaluated on 120 real-world enterprise guideline documents, GUIDE achieves 96% document success, extracts 3,896 rules with 71.4% auto-approved, produces 812 deployment-ready artifacts, and reduces turnaround to 40-125 minutes per document.

Related papers

• From Agent Behaviour to Agent-Friendly Documentation: An Empirical Study of How Coding Agents Discover, Read, and Write Technical Documentation [3.807723380039104]
  Technical documentation is written for human developers.<n>An increasing share of software changes is now authored by autonomous coding agents.<n>We conduct a behaviour-grounded study of agent-documentation interaction across two public datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-20T15:51:54Z)
• DocAtlas: Long-Document Understanding as Mutable-State Interaction [67.90400271544678]
  We present DocAtlas, a system that treats long-document understanding as a mutable-state information-seeking process.<n>Given a document and a question, DocAtlas exposes search, reading, note-taking, and review tools, maintains a hierarchical tree and note store, and updates both as the agent records evidence.<n>With GPT-5.4, DocAtlas reaches 71.4% on MMLongBench-Doc, exceeding the human-expert reference of 65.8%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-21T09:45:34Z)
• AGORA: An Archive-Grounded Benchmark for Agentic Workplace Document Reasoning [52.23991730630292]
  Large language models are increasingly deployed as agents that reason over documents rather than answer from parametric knowledge.<n>We study archive-grounded reasoning: locating sparse evidence across a large, messy collection of workplace files, reconciling inconsistent terminology, units, and time conventions, and computing an answer.<n>We introduce Agora, a benchmark pairing 362 questions with eight domain collections of 9,664 authentic documents and 372M tokens, far exceeding any model's context window.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T12:57:18Z)
• LEDGER: Scaling Agentic Document Editing with Dependency-aware Graph Retrieval [25.28453025760491]
  We introduce LEDGER to tackle the novel context engineering challenge of agentic document editing.<n>LEDGER constructs a lightweight dependency graph that explicitly models document structure.<n>We evaluate LEDGER on a benchmark of 1.9k test cases with various document types and lengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-19T17:35:05Z)
• How Far Is Document Parsing from Solved? PureDocBench: A Source-TraceableBenchmark across Clean, Degraded, and Real-World Settings [56.70440596502351]
  The past year has seen over 20 open document parsing models, yet benchmarks almost exclusively on OmniDocBench.<n>We present PureDocBench, a benchmark thatrenders document images from HTML/CSS, covering 10 domains, 66 pages, and 1,475 pages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T09:30:31Z)
• IDP Accelerator: Agentic Document Intelligence from Extraction to Compliance Validation [3.539467892338473]
  We present IDP (Intelligent Document Processing) Accelerator, a framework enabling agentic AI for end-to-end document intelligence.<n>The interactive demonstration enables users to upload document packets, visualize classification results, and explore extracted data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T20:20:38Z)
• DocRefine: An Intelligent Framework for Scientific Document Understanding and Content Optimization based on Multimodal Large Model Agents [25.190790899297788]
  DocRefine is an innovative framework designed for intelligent understanding, content refinement, and automated summarization of scientific PDF documents.<n>It orchestrates a sophisticated multi-agent system comprising six specialized and collaborative agents.<n>It consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-09T15:32:52Z)
• Zero-Shot Document Understanding using Pseudo Table of Contents-Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation [4.875345207589195]
  DocsRay is a training-free document understanding system.<n>It integrates pseudo Table of Contents (TOC) generation with hierarchical Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T03:14:45Z)
• Beyond Isolated Dots: Benchmarking Structured Table Construction as Deep Knowledge Extraction [80.88654868264645]
  Arranged and Organized Extraction Benchmark designed to evaluate ability of large language models to comprehend fragmented documents.<n>AOE includes 11 carefully crafted tasks across three diverse domains, requiring models to generate context-specific schema tailored to varied input queries.<n>Results show that even the most advanced models struggled significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T06:37:51Z)
• DocKD: Knowledge Distillation from LLMs for Open-World Document Understanding Models [66.91204604417912]
  This study aims to enhance generalizability of small VDU models by distilling knowledge from LLMs. We present a new framework (called DocKD) that enriches the data generation process by integrating external document knowledge. Experiments show that DocKD produces high-quality document annotations and surpasses the direct knowledge distillation approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T00:53:32Z)
• LLM Based Multi-Agent Generation of Semi-structured Documents from Semantic Templates in the Public Administration Domain [2.3999111269325266]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled the creation of customized text output satisfying user requests. We propose a novel approach that combines the LLMs with prompt engineering and multi-agent systems for generating new documents compliant with a desired structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T13:54:53Z)
• Document Layout Annotation: Database and Benchmark in the Domain of Public Affairs [62.38140271294419]
  We propose a procedure to semi-automatically annotate digital documents with different layout labels. We collect a novel database for DLA in the public affairs domain using a set of 24 data sources from the Spanish Administration. The results of our experiments validate the proposed text labeling procedure with accuracy up to 99%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-12T08:21:50Z)
• Language Models Enable Simple Systems for Generating Structured Views of Heterogeneous Data Lakes [54.13559879916708]
  EVAPORATE is a prototype system powered by large language models (LLMs)<n>Code synthesis is cheap, but far less accurate than directly processing each document with the LLM.<n>We propose an extended code implementation, EVAPORATE-CODE+, which achieves better quality than direct extraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T06:00:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.