Coverage Aware Active Evaluation for Failure Discovery with Paired Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13719v1
• Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 19:26:25 GMT
• Title: Coverage Aware Active Evaluation for Failure Discovery with Paired Systems
• Abstract summary: We propose an adaptive failure discovery method that combines proxy evaluations with limited target system results.<n>Our method discovers up to 2$times$ as many failures as random sampling and active-learning baselines.
• Score: 32.870747441157654
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous systems can fail in rare and heterogeneous ways, making real-world failure discovery difficult under limited testing budgets. Although cheaper proxies such as simulators, lower-fidelity systems, or related policies can be sampled extensively to find failures, proxy failures often do not transfer to the real world due to sim-to-real and system-to-system gaps. The key challenge is therefore to effectively leverage proxy system information for accurate prediction of severe target system failures. We propose an adaptive failure discovery method that combines proxy evaluations with limited target system results to guide scenario selection for target system testing. Our method learns a local predictor of target risk by correcting proxy failure signals using control-variate-inspired residual modeling. To find failures that are both likely and diverse, we combine this predictor with a support-aware mutual-information objective that favors realistic, well-supported regions while expanding coverage across failure modes. Across autonomous driving, manipulation, and quadruped velocity-tracking tasks, our method discovers up to 2$\times$ as many failures as random sampling and active-learning baselines, including severe and diverse failures missed by competing methods.

Related papers

• Diffusion-Guided Search via Exponential Tilting (DiffTilt): An Application to Falsification of Safety-Critical Systems [3.963282613048148]
  Existing falsification approaches rely on conditional sampling strategies that factor the joint distribution over environments and system executions.<n>This paper develops DiffTilt, a distributional framework that exponentially tilts a diffusion model-induced joint distribution over environments and executions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-25T10:28:47Z)
• Importance Sampling and PCA for Finding Failures in Commercial Autonomous Vehicles [17.175499236764697]
  Methods for discovering rare failures in autonomous systems have so far been demonstrated almost exclusively in simulations with simple, academic driving stacks.<n>We address this gap by applying two rare-event discovery algorithms to a commercial autonomous trucking stack.<n>We show that both algorithms find simulated collisions during merge and cut-in maneuvers where traditional Monte Carlo simulation does not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-20T16:07:20Z)
• VerifyMAS: Hypothesis Verification for Failure Attribution in LLM Multi-Agent Systems [79.51005192758262]
  Large language model-driven multi-agent systems excel at complex tasks.<n>However, unreliable agents remain a key bottleneck to system-level reliability.<n>We propose a hypothesis verification framework for agent failure attribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T14:09:35Z)
• Failure Identification in Imitation Learning Via Statistical and Semantic Filtering [2.2515832864485024]
  Imitation learning (IL) policies in robotics deliver strong performance in controlled settings but remain brittle in real-world deployments.<n>We introduce FIDeL (Failure Identification in Demonstration Learning), a policy-independent failure detection module.<n>We also introduce BotFails, a multimodal dataset of real-world tasks for failure detection in robotics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T12:27:32Z)
• ProbeLLM: Automating Principled Diagnosis of LLM Failures [89.44131968886184]
  We propose ProbeLLM, a benchmark-agnostic automated probing framework that elevates weakness discovery from individual failures to structured failure modes.<n>By restricting probing to verifiable test cases and leveraging tool-augmented generation and verification, ProbeLLM grounds failure discovery in reliable evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T14:33:13Z)
• Guardian: Detecting Robotic Planning and Execution Errors with Vision-Language Models [53.20969621498248]
  We propose an automatic robot failure synthesis approach that procedurally perturbs successful trajectories to generate diverse planning and execution failures.<n>We construct three new failure detection benchmarks: RLBench-Fail, BridgeDataV2-Fail, and UR5-Fail.<n>We then train Guardian, a VLM with multi-view images for detailed failure reasoning and detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T17:57:27Z)
• CLIP Meets Diffusion: A Synergistic Approach to Anomaly Detection [49.11819337853632]
  Anomaly detection is a complex problem due to the ambiguity in defining anomalies, the diversity of anomaly types, and the scarcity of training data.<n>We propose CLIPfusion, a method that leverages both discriminative and generative foundation models.<n>We believe that our method underscores the effectiveness of multi-modal and multi-model fusion in tackling the multifaceted challenges of anomaly detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T13:30:15Z)
• Can We Detect Failures Without Failure Data? Uncertainty-Aware Runtime Failure Detection for Imitation Learning Policies [19.27526590452503]
  FAIL-Detect is a two-stage approach for failure detection in imitation learning-based robotic manipulation.<n>We first distill policy inputs and outputs into scalar signals that correlate with policy failures and capture uncertainty.<n>Our experiments show learned signals to be mostly consistently effective, particularly when using our novel flow-based density estimator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T15:47:12Z)
• Interactive System-wise Anomaly Detection [66.3766756452743]
  Anomaly detection plays a fundamental role in various applications. It is challenging for existing methods to handle the scenarios where the instances are systems whose characteristics are not readily observed as data. We develop an end-to-end approach which includes an encoder-decoder module that learns system embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T02:20:24Z)
• Adaptive Failure Search Using Critical States from Domain Experts [9.93890332477992]
  Failure search may be done through logging substantial vehicle miles in either simulation or real world testing. AST is one such method that poses the problem of failure search as a Markov decision process. We show that the incorporation of critical states into the AST framework generates failure scenarios with increased safety violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-01T18:14:41Z)
• Safe Multi-agent Learning via Trapping Regions [89.24858306636816]
  We apply the concept of trapping regions, known from qualitative theory of dynamical systems, to create safety sets in the joint strategy space for decentralized learning. We propose a binary partitioning algorithm for verification that candidate sets form trapping regions in systems with known learning dynamics, and a sampling algorithm for scenarios where learning dynamics are not known.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-27T14:47:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.