LLM-Based Hierarchical Coordinated Control with Continuation-Aware Policy Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15041v1
• Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 05:00:02 GMT
• Title: LLM-Based Hierarchical Coordinated Control with Continuation-Aware Policy Learning
• Abstract summary: We propose a hierarchical framework for coordinating multiple interacting units in complex engineering systems.<n>We introduce Continuation-Aware GRPO to capture the consequences of coordination decisions over subsequent control intervals.<n>We validate the framework on multi-ramp traffic control and virtual power plant (VPP) energy management, using simplified system models for training and more realistic simulators for evaluation.
• Score: 6.69561560301489
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Coordinating multiple interacting units in complex engineering systems is challenging when system interactions are difficult to model, operational information is heterogeneous, and low-level actions must satisfy strict constraints. We propose an LLM-based hierarchical framework in which the LLM coordinates interacting units based on heterogeneous operational context, while task-specific controllers or optimizers generate executable and constraint-aware actions. We further introduce Continuation-Aware GRPO to capture the consequences of coordination decisions over subsequent control intervals. Rather than judging a decision only by its immediate outcome, the method also evaluates how the system evolves afterward under the current policy. We validate the framework on multi-ramp traffic control and virtual power plant (VPP) energy management, using simplified system models for training and more realistic simulators for evaluation. Across both tasks, the proposed method consistently outperforms direct task-specific control and optimization, end-to-end reinforcement learning, rule-based and RL-based hierarchical coordination, and prompting-only LLM coordinators, demonstrating the value of heterogeneous-context reasoning, hierarchical execution, and continuation-aware policy learning.

Related papers

• EASy: Towards Efficient LLM-Based Agentic System [54.10819421625103]
  We propose EASy, a trainable agentic framework that jointly optimize task performance and computational efficiency through reinforcement learning.<n> EASy equips an LLM-based orchestrator with explicit knowledge of the capability and cost profiles of heterogeneous executors, enabling context-sensitive coordination beyond performance-only routing.<n>It further introduces a milestone-plan-act workflow that decomposes complex tasks into manageable milestones, constructs dependency-aware execution graphs, assigns suitable executors, and parallelizes independent steps while adapting subsequent decisions to intermediate outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T08:50:36Z)
• Hybrid LLM-Augmented Reinforcement Learning Agents for Complex Sequential Decision Tasks [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently shown strong capabilities in reasoning, planning, and tool-use, enabling new forms of autonomous agents.<n>This paper introduces an LLM-Augmented Reinforcement Learning Agent that integrates LLM-driven planning with RL-based action optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T11:44:07Z)
• CoRAL: Contact-Rich Adaptive LLM-based Control for Robotic Manipulation [4.600772894287281]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities in high-level reasoning and semantic understanding.<n>We propose CoRAL, a modular framework that enables zero-shot planning by decoupling high-level reasoning from low-level control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T13:49:19Z)
• Policy-Conditioned Policies for Multi-Agent Task Solving [53.67744322553693]
  In this work, we propose a paradigm shift that bridges the gap by representing policies as human-interpretable source code.<n>We reformulate the learning problem by utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) as approximate interpreters.<n>We formalize this process as textitProgrammatic Iterated Best Response (PIBR), an algorithm where the policy code is optimized by textual gradients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T07:42:10Z)
• Learning Affordances at Inference-Time for Vision-Language-Action Models [50.93181349331096]
  In robotics, Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) offer a promising path towards solving complex control tasks.<n>We introduce Learning from Inference-Time Execution (LITEN), which connects a VLA low-level policy to a high-level VLM that conditions on past experiences.<n>Our approach iterates between a reasoning phase that generates and executes plans for the low-level VLA, and an assessment phase that reflects on the resulting execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T16:43:29Z)
• Joint Optimization of Cooperation Efficiency and Communication Covertness for Target Detection with AUVs [105.81167650318054]
  This paper investigates underwater cooperative target detection using autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs)<n>We first formulate a joint trajectory and power control optimization problem, and then present an innovative hierarchical action management framework to solve it.<n>Under the centralized training and decentralized execution paradigm, our target detection framework enables adaptive covert cooperation while satisfying both energy and mobility constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T02:14:11Z)
• Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with Low-Level MPC for Multi-Agent Control [1.5856188608650232]
  We propose a hierarchical framework that combines tactical decision-making via reinforcement learning (RL) with low-level execution through Model Predictive Control (MPC)<n>tested on a predator-prey benchmark, our approach outperforms end-to-end and shielding-based RL baselines in terms of reward, safety, and consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T09:27:15Z)
• Application of LLM Guided Reinforcement Learning in Formation Control with Collision Avoidance [1.1718316049475228]
  Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) excel at accomplishing complex objectives through the collaborative efforts of individual agents.<n>In this paper, we introduce a novel framework that aims to overcome the challenge of designing an effective reward function.<n>By giving large language models (LLMs) on the prioritization of tasks, our framework generates reward functions that can be dynamically adjusted online.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T09:26:00Z)
• Enhancing Multi-Agent Systems via Reinforcement Learning with LLM-based Planner and Graph-based Policy [31.041340552853004]
  Graph Collaboration MARL (LGC-MARL) is a framework that efficiently combines Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL)<n>LGC-MARL decomposes complex tasks into executable subtasks and achieves efficient collaboration among multiple agents through graph-based coordination.<n> Experimental results on the AI2-THOR simulation platform demonstrate the superior performance and scalability of LGC-MARL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T05:02:49Z)
• COMBO-Grasp: Learning Constraint-Based Manipulation for Bimanual Occluded Grasping [56.907940167333656]
  Occluded robot grasping is where the desired grasp poses are kinematically infeasible due to environmental constraints such as surface collisions.<n>Traditional robot manipulation approaches struggle with the complexity of non-prehensile or bimanual strategies commonly used by humans.<n>We introduce Constraint-based Manipulation for Bimanual Occluded Grasping (COMBO-Grasp), a learning-based approach which leverages two coordinated policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T01:31:01Z)
• Attribute Controlled Fine-tuning for Large Language Models: A Case Study on Detoxification [76.14641982122696]
  We propose a constraint learning schema for fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) with attribute control. We show that our approach leads to an LLM that produces fewer inappropriate responses while achieving competitive performance on benchmarks and a toxicity detection task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T23:38:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.