LongDocBench: Benchmarking TOC Hierarchy and Contextual Relationship Recovery in Long Documents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15064v1
- Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 06:25:26 GMT
- Title: LongDocBench: Benchmarking TOC Hierarchy and Contextual Relationship Recovery in Long Documents
- Abstract summary: We introduce textscLongDocBench, comprising 85 real-world financial reports, textbooks, and academic papers spanning 2,582 pages, with up to 105 pages per document.<n>It provides human-verified annotations for 3,937 heading nodes (mean node depth 3.55; maximum depth 9) and 3,258 contextual relationships annotated across 2,680 table and figure objects.<n>Long-document question-answering experiments show that human-verified hierarchies and contextual relationships improve reasoning, with their combination providing complementary benefits.
- Score: 7.641999919052611
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Parsing visual documents into machine-readable representations is fundamental to document intelligence. Existing benchmarks focus on page-level element recognition, reading order, formula recognition, and table structure. Long documents, however, also require document-level structure recovery. This includes reconstructing cross-page table-of-contents (TOC) hierarchies and identifying typed links from tables and figures to their captions, notes, and sources, often in one-to-many form. Because these structures are covered only partially or subsumed within broader parsing protocols, existing benchmarks cannot directly evaluate two key document-level tasks: \emph{Table-of-Contents Hierarchy Recovery} and \emph{Contextual Relationship Recovery}. To benchmark these two tasks, we introduce \textsc{LongDocBench}, comprising 85 real-world financial reports, textbooks, and academic papers spanning 2,582 pages, with up to 105 pages per document. It provides human-verified annotations for 3,937 heading nodes (mean node depth 3.55; maximum depth 9) and 3,258 contextual relationships annotated across 2,680 table and figure objects. We further evaluate both the downstream utility and recoverability of these structures. Long-document question-answering experiments show that human-verified TOC hierarchies and contextual relationships improve reasoning, with their combination providing complementary benefits. Meanwhile, representative document parsers remain limited on both recovery tasks despite strong page-level performance. To support further progress, we publicly release \textsc{LongDocBench} and its evaluation protocol and reproducible testbed for advancing document-level structure recovery in long documents.
Related papers
- ConceptFormer: Learning Adaptive Latent Concepts for Query-Document Alignment in Visual Document Retrieval [62.80735412748694]
ConceptFormer is a latent concept representation learning framework for visual document retrieval.<n>It query-relevant evidence as continuous, query-conditioned latent concepts that explicitly bridge localized visual evidence and semantic relevance.<n>It achieves 16.7% and 22.1% relative improvements in average NDCG@10 over the strongest visual retrieval baseline and the strongest OCR-based text retrieval baseline, respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-16T12:07:12Z) - FormStruct-Bench:A Hierarchical and Diagnostic Benchmark for Table-Form Document Structure Recognition [3.879207672674058]
We introduce FormStruct-Bench, a hierarchical and diagnostic benchmark that evaluates table-form document structure recognition.<n>To construct auditable ground truth at scale, we annotate 70 reusable templates and expand them into 7,000 verified instances.<n>Across 14 API-hosted and locally deployable systems plus two SFT variants, the best document-level score reaches 83.85%, whereas the best reported fine-grained structural score remains below 18%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-11T02:44:34Z) - DOSA: A Tree-Guided, Self-Regressive Framework for Long Document Structure Analysis [0.0]
We propose a tree-guided framework, DOSA, for inferring relations among page objects and reconstructing document-level semantic trees.<n> DOSA processes documents chunk-by-chunk, fusing visual, textual, and layout features for each page object and predicting hierarchical and ordering relations.<n>Results on five benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of DOSA, with improvements of up to 4 F1 points and 19 TEDS points on DocHieNet.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-11T04:58:00Z) - Trace Only What You Need: Structure-Aware On-Demand Hypergraph Memory for Long-Document Question Answering [11.17007249581283]
Long-document question answering requires large language models to reason over evidence scattered across lengthy documents.<n>Existing structured RAG methods face three limitations: costly query-agnostic knowledge organization, insufficient use of original document structure, and no reuse of historical reasoning experience.<n>We propose DocTrace, a multi-agent RAG framework for long-document QA that supports query-triggered knowledge organization, document-structure-aware and experience-guided reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-09T14:29:06Z) - Dr. DocBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Expert-Level and Difficult Document Parsing [53.41293908252118]
We introduce Dr. DocBench, a difficulty-aware benchmark for expert-level document parsing.<n>Dr. DocBench spans 52 BISAC domains and selects documents through failure-based sampling.<n>It contains 4,514 annotated pages from long documents averaging around 100 pages, with 65k high-quality annotations for layout, reading order, hierarchical relations, and domain-specific visual contents.<n>Our analysis reveals substantial failures across subjects, content types, and structural attributes, highlighting Dr. DocBench as a comprehensive testbed for diagnosing and advancing document intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-31T18:35:30Z) - MPDocBench-Parse: Benchmarking Practical Multi-page Document Parsing [74.84107522458798]
MPDocBench-Parse is a benchmark for multi-page document parsing in real-world applications.<n>It contains 433 manually annotated documents with 3,246 pages, covering 15 document types in English and Chinese, with diverse layout styles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-21T07:36:41Z) - MoDora: Tree-Based Semi-Structured Document Analysis System [62.01015188258797]
Semi-structured documents integrate diverse interleaved data elements arranged in various and often irregular layouts.<n>MoDora is an LLM-powered system for semi-structured document analysis.<n> Experiments show MoDora outperforms baselines by 5.97%-61.07% in accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T14:48:49Z) - MonkeyOCR v1.5 Technical Report: Unlocking Robust Document Parsing for Complex Patterns [80.05126590825121]
MonkeyOCR v1.5 is a unified vision-language framework that enhances both layout understanding and content recognition.<n>To address complex table structures, we propose a visual consistency-based reinforcement learning scheme.<n>Two specialized modules, Image-Decoupled Table Parsing and Type-Guided Table Merging, are introduced to enable reliable parsing of tables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T15:12:17Z) - PDFTriage: Question Answering over Long, Structured Documents [60.96667912964659]
Representing structured documents as plain text is incongruous with the user's mental model of these documents with rich structure.
We propose PDFTriage that enables models to retrieve the context based on either structure or content.
Our benchmark dataset consists of 900+ human-generated questions over 80 structured documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-16T04:29:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.