Balancing Privacy and Compliance in DeFi: A Zero-Knowledge-Based Auditable Cross-Chain Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15276v1
• Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 15:19:10 GMT
• Title: Balancing Privacy and Compliance in DeFi: A Zero-Knowledge-Based Auditable Cross-Chain Framework
• Abstract summary: Cross-chain transactions face a conflict between user privacy and regulatory compliance.<n>This research proposes an auditable cross-chain framework that integrates three building blocks.
• Score: 1.235954230370251
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With the rise of decentralized finance (DeFi), cross-chain transactions, transfers of assets across different blockchain networks, face a fundamental conflict between user privacy and regulatory compliance. Unlike single-chain systems, cross-chain environments must balance privacy and auditability across heterogeneous architectures. Existing solutions, from transparent ledgers to anonymous cryptocurrencies, fail to reconcile these two requirements, hindering regulatory adoption. This research proposes an auditable cross-chain framework that integrates three building blocks. First, zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) verify transaction compliance (e.g., amount non-negativity, signature validity) without revealing transaction details. Second, a light-client mechanism enables trust-minimized cross-chain verification without relying on third-party relayers. Third, a threshold view-key mechanism based on distributed key generation (DKG) ensures that audit access is granted only to authorized entities under legal triggers such as the FATF Travel Rule and MiCA Regulation. For cross-border investigations, the framework adheres to national laws and the EU Directive on Mutual Legal Assistance. This work systematically combines ZKPs, threshold cryptography, and light-client verification into an auditable, privacy-preserving cross-chain protocol. It contributes to Regulatory Technology (RegTech) and provides a viable path toward compliant, interoperable decentralized finance.

Related papers

• Blockchain Empowered Trustworthy Agent Networks: Foundations, Taxonomy, and Future Directions [47.65093774088672]
  This survey and tutorial article reviews the literature over the period 1980--2026 on the evolution from classical multi-agent systems to open agent networks.<n>We first review this evolution and show how the trust boundary expands from individual execution to cross-agent, cross-platform, and cross-organizational interaction.<n>We develop a five-dimensional taxonomy covering entity and capability trust, authorization and delegation trust, information and trust, coordination and group-robustness trust, and accountability and settlement trust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T09:32:35Z)
• TRUST: A Framework for Decentralized AI Service v.0.1 [47.384270414446604]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) and Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) in high-stakes domains demand reliable verification.<n>We introduce TRUST (Transparent, Robust, and Unified Services for Trustworthy AI), a decentralized framework with three innovations.<n>We prove a Safety-Profitability Theorem ensuring honest auditors profit while malicious actors incur losses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T19:32:58Z)
• GoAT-X: A Graph of Auditing Thoughts for Securing Token Transactions in Cross-Chain Contracts [52.51342355102833]
  Cross-chain bridges, the critical infrastructure of the multi-chain ecosystem, have become a primary target for attackers.<n>Existing defenses, such as bytecode-level static analysis, are ill-equipped to handle the semantic complexity of cross-chain interactions.<n>We propose GoAT-X, a framework that shifts automated cross-chain smart contracts auditing from pattern matching toward systematic first-principles verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T11:34:21Z)
• Know Your Contract: Extending eIDAS Trust into Public Blockchains [0.0]
  This paper presents an architecture that extends the European Union eIDAS trust framework into public blockchain ecosystems.<n>The mechanism establishes a verifiable chain of trust from the European Commission List of Trusted Lists to individual on-chain addresses.<n>The proposed architecture provides a pathway for integrating European digital trust infrastructure into blockchain-based systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T12:29:00Z)
• TRUST: A Decentralized Framework for Auditing Large Language Model Reasoning [45.228233498964755]
  Large Language Models generate reasoning chains that reveal their decision-making.<n>Existing auditing methods are centralized, opaque, and hard to scale.<n>We propose TRUST, a transparent, decentralized auditing framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T04:16:44Z)
• VeilAudit: Breaking the Deadlock Between Privacy and Accountability Across Blockchains [2.676349883103404]
  Cross chain interoperability in blockchain systems exposes a fundamental tension between user privacy and regulatory accountability.<n>We present VeilAudit, a cross chain auditing framework that introduces Auditor Only Linkability.<n>VeilAudit achieves this with a user generated Linkable Audit Tag that embeds a zero knowledge proof to attest to its validity without exposing the user master wallet address.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T05:16:23Z)
• Privacy-Preserving On-chain Permissioning for KYC-Compliant Decentralized Applications [0.0]
  This paper presents a novel synthesis of Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI), Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) and Attribute-Based Access Control.<n>We provide a comprehensive framework for permissioned dApps that aligns decentralized trust, privacy, and transparency, harmonizing blockchain principles with regulatory compliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T11:24:51Z)
• Balancing Confidentiality and Transparency for Blockchain-based Process-Aware Information Systems [43.253676241213626]
  We propose an architecture for blockchain-based PAISs to preserve confidentiality and transparency.<n>Smart contracts enact, enforce and store public interactions, while attribute-based encryption techniques are adopted to specify access grants to confidential information.<n>We assess the security of our solution through a systematic threat model analysis and evaluate its practical feasibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-07T20:18:36Z)
• It Takes Two: A Peer-Prediction Solution for Blockchain Verifier's Dilemma [12.663727952216476]
  We develop a Byzantine-robust peer prediction framework towards the design of one-phase Bayesian truthful mechanisms for the decentralized verification games.<n>Our study provides a framework of incentive design for decentralized verification protocols that enhances the security and robustness of the blockchain, decentralized AI, and potentially other decentralized systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T21:21:17Z)
• Enhancing Trust and Privacy in Distributed Networks: A Comprehensive Survey on Blockchain-based Federated Learning [51.13534069758711]
  Decentralized approaches like blockchain offer a compelling solution by implementing a consensus mechanism among multiple entities. Federated Learning (FL) enables participants to collaboratively train models while safeguarding data privacy. This paper investigates the synergy between blockchain's security features and FL's privacy-preserving model training capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T07:08:26Z)
• Regulation conform DLT-operable payment adapter based on trustless - justified trust combined generalized state channels [77.34726150561087]
  Economy of Things (EoT) will be based on software agents running on peer-to-peer trustless networks. We give an overview of current solutions that differ in their fundamental values and technological possibilities. We propose to combine the strengths of the crypto based, decentralized trustless elements with established and well regulated means of payment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T10:45:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.