Visualizing Uncertainty-to-Action Composition for Human Oversight

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16428v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 11:28:41 GMT
• Title: Visualizing Uncertainty-to-Action Composition for Human Oversight
• Abstract summary: Most uncertainty visualizations encode uncertainty in model outputs, leaving users to discern the most appropriate course of action.<n>We introduce an uncertainty-to-action binding framework that composes multiple uncertainty conditions into a single oversight response.<n>We also present ActionCue, a process-transparency visualization that renders that composition explicit.
• Score: 0.3823356975862005
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence systems often disclose uncertainty, yet they rarely make clear what response that uncertainty should trigger. Most uncertainty visualizations encode uncertainty in model outputs, leaving users to discern the most appropriate course of action. A second region of the design space--uncertainty in the decision process itself, including how multiple uncertainty conditions compose into an oversight response-- remains comparatively underexplored. We address this gap with two coupled contributions. First, we introduce an uncertainty-to-action binding framework that composes multiple uncertainty conditions into a single oversight response under a precedence policy with a contextual safety modifier. That response concerns whether and how an AI-supported decision may proceed, not the substantive domain decision itself. Second, we present ActionCue, a process-transparency visualization that renders that composition explicit. We demonstrate the approach through a three-way comparison with confidence-only and data-level uncertainty displays, using worked cases from healthcare, credit assessment, and disaster forecasting. Together, the framework specifies how uncertainty conditions are resolved into an oversight response, and the visualization makes that resolution inspectable rather than implicit.

Related papers

• Decision Making Needs Uncertainty Quantification [Lecture Notes] [35.36148913066079]
  This lecture note develops, from first principles and within a single decision-theoretic setting, the link between the objective and the knowledge of an agent.<n>We show that a risk-neutral agent needs the posterior distribution over the state, whereas a risk-averse agent can rely without loss of optimality on a prediction set and a worst-case decision rule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T22:50:26Z)
• Aligning LLM Uncertainty with Human Disagreement in Subjectivity Analysis [57.78407973423517]
  We advocate uncertainty-aware subjectivity analysis, where models are expected to make predictions while expressing uncertainty that reflects human disagreement.<n>To operationalize this perspective, we propose a two-phase Disagreement Perception and Uncertainty Alignment framework.<n> Experiments on three subjectivity analysis tasks show that DPUA preserves task performance while better aligning model uncertainty with human disagreement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T11:52:58Z)
• Principle-Guided Supervision for Interpretable Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation [15.512833015785773]
  We develop a principle-guided uncertainty supervision framework (PriUS) based on evidential learning.<n>PriUS produces more consistent uncertainty estimates while maintaining competitive segmentation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T05:17:20Z)
• Verbalizing LLM's Higher-order Uncertainty via Imprecise Probabilities [13.14855346396444]
  First-order uncertainty captures uncertainty over possible responses to a prompt, while second-order uncertainty quantifies indeterminacy in the underlying probability model itself.<n>We introduce general-purpose prompting and post-processing procedures to directly elicit and quantify both orders of uncertainty, and demonstrate their effectiveness across diverse settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T04:21:04Z)
• Agentic Uncertainty Quantification [76.94013626702183]
  We propose a unified Dual-Process Agentic UQ (AUQ) framework that transforms verbalized uncertainty into active, bi-directional control signals.<n>Our architecture comprises two complementary mechanisms: System 1 (Uncertainty-Aware Memory, UAM), which implicitly propagates verbalized confidence and semantic explanations to prevent blind decision-making; and System 2 (Uncertainty-Aware Reflection, UAR), which utilizes these explanations as rational cues to trigger targeted inference-time resolution only when necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T07:16:26Z)
• Do not Abstain! Identify and Solve the Uncertainty [25.744791822890036]
  We introduce bftextConfuseBench, a benchmark mainly focus on three types of uncertainty: document scarcity, limited capability, and query ambiguity.<n>Experiments reveal that current LLMs struggle to accurately identify the root cause of uncertainty and solve it.<n>We first generate context-aware inquiries that highlight the confusing aspect of the original query.<n>Then we judge the source of uncertainty based on the uniqueness of the inquiry's answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T02:15:17Z)
• SConU: Selective Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models [59.25881667640868]
  We propose a novel approach termed Selective Conformal Uncertainty (SConU)<n>We develop two conformal p-values that are instrumental in determining whether a given sample deviates from the uncertainty distribution of the calibration set at a specific manageable risk level.<n>Our approach not only facilitates rigorous management of miscoverage rates across both single-domain and interdisciplinary contexts, but also enhances the efficiency of predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-19T03:01:45Z)
• SAUP: Situation Awareness Uncertainty Propagation on LLM Agent [52.444674213316574]
  Large language models (LLMs) integrated into multistep agent systems enable complex decision-making processes across various applications.<n>Existing uncertainty estimation methods primarily focus on final-step outputs, which fail to account for cumulative uncertainty over the multistep decision-making process and the dynamic interactions between agents and their environments.<n>We propose SAUP, a novel framework that propagates uncertainty through each step of an LLM-based agent's reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T01:31:13Z)
• Know Where You're Uncertain When Planning with Multimodal Foundation Models: A Formal Framework [54.40508478482667]
  We present a comprehensive framework to disentangle, quantify, and mitigate uncertainty in perception and plan generation.<n>We propose methods tailored to the unique properties of perception and decision-making.<n>We show that our uncertainty disentanglement framework reduces variability by up to 40% and enhances task success rates by 5% compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T17:32:00Z)
• Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty [66.17147341354577]
  We argue for considering a complementary form of transparency by estimating and communicating the uncertainty associated with model predictions. We describe how uncertainty can be used to mitigate model unfairness, augment decision-making, and build trustworthy systems. This work constitutes an interdisciplinary review drawn from literature spanning machine learning, visualization/HCI, design, decision-making, and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-15T17:26:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.