BabelSteering: Multilingual Safety Alignment via English Steering Vectors

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16577v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:40:16 GMT
• Title: BabelSteering: Multilingual Safety Alignment via English Steering Vectors
• Abstract summary: We investigate whether safety signals learned from a high-resource language, like English, can improve multilingual safety.<n>We propose BabelSteering, an activation steering method that acts as a lightweight inference- time intervention.<n>Results show that BabelSteering increases the refusal of harmful requests across languages.
• Score: 11.019536451878162
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are deployed globally in high-stakes settings, yet most safety research and alignment efforts remain concentrated on English. Thus, users interacting with LLMs in other languages may encounter weaker safeguards despite relying on the same systems for similarly sensitive tasks. In this work, we investigate whether safety signals learned from a high-resource language, like English, can improve multilingual safety. We propose BabelSteering, an activation steering method that acts as a lightweight inference- time intervention, using refusal directions derived from English safety supervision to generalize across languages. Our evaluation includes eight languages and jointly measures refusal of harmful requests, over-refusal, and general task utility. The results show that BabelSteering increases the refusal of harmful requests across languages, with only a marginal to no reduction in task utility but with some increase in refusal of pseudo-harmful prompts. For example, for Gemma 7B, we see an average increase in the refusal of harmful prompts across languages of 11 percentage points (pp), with individual languages like Bengali seeing an increase of 17 pp, with no loss of utility on Global MMLU, while pseudo-harmful refusals increase by 13 pp on average. We also introduce a multilingual translation-and-evaluation pipeline to facilitate future work on cross-lingual safety interventions. Overall, our findings suggest that activation steering may provide a practical, low- cost mechanism for extending English-derived safety signals to other languages. Warning: this paper contains examples with unsafe content

Related papers

• IndicSafeEval: Safety Robustness of Large Language Models under Multilingual Persuasive Jailbreak Attacks [33.08360320836576]
  We introduce IndicSafeEval, a persuasion-based jailbreak evaluation framework for Indian languages.<n>Our benchmark combines ten safety critical content categories with six human-like persuasive strategies across four different Indian languages.<n>Our analysis shows that the model does not behave equally safely across all languages and prompt styles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-03T12:54:44Z)
• The Illusion of Cross-Lingual Safety in Low-Resource Languages [7.471112976694495]
  Safety alignment in large language models (LLMs) is largely developed in English, assuming these safeguards generalize across multilingual settings.<n>We investigate cross-lingual safety transfer in four African languages, Twi, Hausa, Amharic, and Swahili, using LoDNA, a new safety dataset that pairs literal translations with culturally localized prompts.<n>Our experimental results show that cross-lingual safety transfer is severely limited; harmful prompts retain less than 10% of the English refusal signal across most language-model pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T17:05:26Z)
• Schützen: Evaluating LLM Safety in Bulgarian and German Contexts [53.865251738592605]
  This paper introduces Schtzen: a German--Bulgarian safety dataset designed to assess model answerability under risk.<n> Experiments with multilingual and language-specific LLMs reveal pronounced cross-language differences in safety behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T18:01:19Z)
• Refusal Direction is Universal Across Safety-Aligned Languages [66.64709923081745]
  In this paper, we investigate the refusal behavior in large language models (LLMs) across 14 languages using PolyRefuse.<n>We uncover the surprising cross-lingual universality of the refusal direction: a vector extracted from English can bypass refusals in other languages with near-perfect effectiveness.<n>We attribute this transferability to the parallelism of refusal vectors across languages in the embedding space and identify the underlying mechanism behind cross-lingual jailbreaks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T21:54:46Z)
• MrGuard: A Multilingual Reasoning Guardrail for Universal LLM Safety [56.77103365251923]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to adversarial attacks such as jailbreaking.<n>This vulnerability is exacerbated in multilingual settings, where multilingual safety-aligned data is often limited.<n>We introduce a multilingual guardrail with reasoning for prompt classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T17:15:06Z)
• TuBA: Cross-Lingual Transferability of Backdoor Attacks in LLMs with Instruction Tuning [63.481446315733145]
  Cross-lingual backdoor attacks against multilingual large language models (LLMs) are under-explored.<n>Our research focuses on how poisoning the instruction-tuning data for one or two languages can affect the outputs for languages whose instruction-tuning data were not poisoned.<n>Our method exhibits remarkable efficacy in models like mT5 and GPT-4o, with high attack success rates, surpassing 90% in more than 7 out of 12 languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T14:43:57Z)
• Multilingual Jailbreak Challenges in Large Language Models [96.74878032417054]
  In this study, we reveal the presence of multilingual jailbreak challenges within large language models (LLMs) We consider two potential risky scenarios: unintentional and intentional. We propose a novel textscSelf-Defense framework that automatically generates multilingual training data for safety fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T09:44:06Z)
• Low-Resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-4 [19.97929171158234]
  Our work exposes the inherent cross-lingual vulnerability of AI safety training and red-teaming of large language models (LLMs) On the AdvBenchmark, GPT-4 engages with the unsafe translated inputs and provides actionable items that can get the users towards their harmful goals 79% of the time. Other high-/mid-resource languages have significantly lower attack success rate, which suggests that the cross-lingual vulnerability mainly applies to low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T21:30:56Z)
• All Languages Matter: On the Multilingual Safety of Large Language Models [96.47607891042523]
  We build the first multilingual safety benchmark for large language models (LLMs) XSafety covers 14 kinds of commonly used safety issues across 10 languages that span several language families. We propose several simple and effective prompting methods to improve the multilingual safety of ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T05:23:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.