Revisiting Classifier-Free Guidance Methods in Latent Diffusion Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16786v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 16:40:54 GMT
• Title: Revisiting Classifier-Free Guidance Methods in Latent Diffusion Models
• Abstract summary: Inference-time quality-enhancement methods are widely adopted to improve diffusion models.<n>We re-evaluate eight such methods on two open-weight transformers under a fixed per-model protocol.<n>No method consistently improves on CFG across the measured criteria.
• Score: 0.2730969268472861
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Inference-time quality-enhancement methods are an effective and widely adopted means of improving diffusion models without expensive retraining. We study a family of training-free techniques conceptually rooted in Classifier-Free Guidance (CFG), most of which were originally proposed on older U-Net diffusion models and validated using metrics that assess image quality in isolation, without accounting for compositional alignment or semantic correspondence between the generated image and its associated text prompt. We re-evaluate eight such methods on two open-weight rectified-flow transformers under a fixed per-model protocol and three compositional-alignment benchmarks. No method consistently improves on CFG across the measured criteria. APG obtains several nominal best scores, but the corresponding gains often remain within the estimated evaluation uncertainty. Attention-perturbation methods provide isolated gains on SD3.5 Medium and more frequent degradations on FLUX.2 [klein] 4B Base, while CFG remains a competitive lower-cost baseline.

Related papers

• Too Correct to Learn: Reinforcement Learning on Saturated Reasoning Data [55.84428098924793]
  We propose Constrained Uniform Top-K Sampling (CUTS), a parameter-free decoding strategy enforcing structure-preserving exploration.<n>We integrate this into Mixed-CUTS, a training framework synergizing exploitative and exploratory rollouts to amplify intra-group advantage variance.<n> Notably, Mixed-CUTS improves Pass@1 accuracy on the challenging AIME25 benchmark by up to 15.1% over standard GRPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T16:43:28Z)
• Improving Classifier-Free Guidance of Flow Matching via Manifold Projection [3.6087998976768128]
  We provide a principled interpretation of CFG through the lens of optimization.<n>We reformulate the CFG sampling as a homotopy optimization with manifold constraint.<n>Our proposed methods are training-free and consistently refine generation fidelity, prompt alignment, and robustness to the guidance scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T15:49:31Z)
• Improving Local Fidelity Through Sampling and Modeling Nonlinearity [3.7080015862513847]
  Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanation (LIME) assumes that the local decision boundary is linear and fails to capture the non-linear relationships.<n>We propose a novel method that can generate high-fidelity explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T09:26:18Z)
• Enhancing Diffusion Model Guidance through Calibration and Regularization [9.22066257345387]
  This paper introduces two complementary contributions to address this issue.<n>First, we propose a differentiable calibration objective based on the Smooth Expected Error (Smooth ECE)<n>Second, we develop enhanced sampling guidance methods that operate on off-the-shelf classifiers without requiring retraining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-08T04:23:42Z)
• Reference-Specific Unlearning Metrics Can Hide the Truth: A Reality Check [60.77691669644931]
  We propose Functional Alignment for Distributional Equivalence (FADE), a novel metric that measures distributional similarity between unlearned and reference models.<n>We show that FADE captures functional alignment across the entire output distribution, providing a principled assessment of genuine unlearning.<n>These findings expose fundamental gaps in current evaluation practices and demonstrate that FADE provides a more robust foundation for developing and assessing truly effective unlearning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T20:50:30Z)
• DiffusionNFT: Online Diffusion Reinforcement with Forward Process [99.94852379720153]
  Diffusion Negative-aware FineTuning (DiffusionNFT) is a new online RL paradigm that optimize diffusion models directly on the forward process via flow matching.<n>DiffusionNFT is up to $25times$ more efficient than FlowGRPO in head-to-head comparisons, while being CFG-free.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T16:09:33Z)
• Solving Inverse Problems with FLAIR [68.87167940623318]
  We present FLAIR, a training-free variational framework that leverages flow-based generative models as prior for inverse problems.<n>Results on standard imaging benchmarks demonstrate that FLAIR consistently outperforms existing diffusion- and flow-based methods in terms of reconstruction quality and sample diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T09:29:47Z)
• Contrastive CFG: Improving CFG in Diffusion Models by Contrasting Positive and Negative Concepts [55.298031232672734]
  As-Free Guidance (CFG) has proven effective in conditional diffusion model sampling for improved condition alignment. We present a novel method to enhance negative CFG guidance using contrastive loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T03:29:27Z)
• Eliminating Oversaturation and Artifacts of High Guidance Scales in Diffusion Models [27.640009920058187]
  We revisit the CFG update rule and introduce modifications to address this issue.<n>We propose down-weighting the parallel component to achieve high-quality generations without oversaturation.<n>We also introduce a new rescaling momentum method for the CFG update rule based on this insight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T12:06:29Z)
• Adaptive Guidance: Training-free Acceleration of Conditional Diffusion Models [44.58960475893552]
  "Adaptive Guidance" (AG) is an efficient variant of computation-Free Guidance (CFG) AG preserves CFG's image quality while reducing by 25%. " LinearAG" offers even cheaper inference at the cost of deviating from the baseline model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T17:08:48Z)
• Deblurring via Stochastic Refinement [85.42730934561101]
  We present an alternative framework for blind deblurring based on conditional diffusion models. Our method is competitive in terms of distortion metrics such as PSNR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-05T04:36:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.