An Investigation of Translationese in the Generations of Multilingual Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17399v1
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 05:50:36 GMT
- Title: An Investigation of Translationese in the Generations of Multilingual Large Language Models
- Abstract summary: It is unclear if MLLMs' generations resemble English or translationese from other languages.<n>We leverage established indicators of translated text to evaluate state-of-the-art MLLMs in five languages.<n>We examine the key features that distinguish MLLM-generated text from typical translation-related interference.
- Score: 12.692405359509259
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Text which has been translated from another language tends to carry with it evidence of translation$\unicode{x2014}$hence, it is often referred to as $\textit{translationese}$. Multilingual large language models (MLLMs) generate text in a variety of languages. However, it is still unclear if MLLMs' generations resemble internal translation (from English or, potentially, other languages) and, thus, result in translationese. Here, we ask the following research questions: (1) Does text generated by MLLMs resemble translationese? (2) How does translationese produced by MLLMs differ from translationese produced through direct translation? We leverage established indicators of translated text to evaluate text generated by state-of-the-art MLLMs in five languages, comparing to both non-translated and human-written baselines in order to isolate translationese from other kinds of interference. Through the use of high-accuracy classification models, analyses of variance on individual linguistic features, and the collection of human annotations in a subset of two languages (German and Spanish), we assess the translationese content of MLLM generations and examine the key features that distinguish MLLM-generated text from typical translation-related interference.
Related papers
- Lost in Literalism: How Supervised Training Shapes Translationese in LLMs [51.04435855143767]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in machine translation.<n>However, translationese, characterized by overly literal and unnatural translations, remains a persistent challenge.<n>We introduce methods to mitigate these biases, including polishing golden references and filtering unnatural training instances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-06T12:14:45Z) - LLM-based Translation Inference with Iterative Bilingual Understanding [52.46978502902928]
We propose a novel Iterative Bilingual Understanding Translation method based on the cross-lingual capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>The cross-lingual capability of LLMs enables the generation of contextual understanding for both the source and target languages separately.<n>The proposed IBUT outperforms several strong comparison methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-16T13:21:46Z) - (Perhaps) Beyond Human Translation: Harnessing Multi-Agent Collaboration for Translating Ultra-Long Literary Texts [56.7988577327046]
We introduce TransAgents, a novel multi-agent framework that simulates the roles and collaborative practices of a human translation company.<n>Our findings highlight the potential of multi-agent collaboration in enhancing translation quality, particularly for longer texts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-20T05:55:08Z) - Adapting Large Language Models for Document-Level Machine Translation [46.370862171452444]
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced various natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
Recent research indicates that moderately-sized LLMs often outperform larger ones after task-specific fine-tuning.
This study focuses on adapting LLMs for document-level machine translation (DocMT) for specific language pairs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T09:29:13Z) - Do GPTs Produce Less Literal Translations? [20.095646048167612]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as general-purpose language models capable of addressing many natural language generation or understanding tasks.
We find that translations out of English (E-X) from GPTs tend to be less literal, while exhibiting similar or better scores on Machine Translation quality metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T10:38:31Z) - Eliciting the Translation Ability of Large Language Models via Multilingual Finetuning with Translation Instructions [68.01449013641532]
Large-scale Pretrained Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong abilities in multilingual translations.
We present a detailed analysis by finetuning a multilingual pretrained language model, XGLM-7B, to perform multilingual translation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T12:00:24Z) - Decomposed Prompting for Machine Translation Between Related Languages
using Large Language Models [55.35106713257871]
We introduce DecoMT, a novel approach of few-shot prompting that decomposes the translation process into a sequence of word chunk translations.
We show that DecoMT outperforms the strong few-shot prompting BLOOM model with an average improvement of 8 chrF++ scores across the examined languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T14:52:47Z) - Searching for Needles in a Haystack: On the Role of Incidental
Bilingualism in PaLM's Translation Capability [16.01088313166145]
We investigate the role of incidental bilingualism in large language models.
We show that PaLM is exposed to over 30 million translation pairs across at least 44 languages.
We show that its presence has a substantial impact on translation capabilities, although this impact diminishes with model scale.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-17T14:58:06Z) - Multilingual Machine Translation with Large Language Models: Empirical Results and Analysis [103.89753784762445]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in handling multilingual machine translation (MMT)
This paper systematically investigates the advantages and challenges of LLMs for MMT.
We thoroughly evaluate eight popular LLMs, including ChatGPT and GPT-4.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-10T15:51:30Z) - Does Transliteration Help Multilingual Language Modeling? [0.0]
We empirically measure the effect of transliteration on Multilingual Language Models.
We focus on the Indic languages, which have the highest script diversity in the world.
We find that transliteration benefits the low-resource languages without negatively affecting the comparatively high-resource languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-29T05:48:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.