Capability-Based Planning for AI Crisis Preparedness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18357v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 22:20:02 GMT
• Title: Capability-Based Planning for AI Crisis Preparedness
• Abstract summary: Government AI preparations follow a predict-then-act paradigm: rank risks by likelihood and impact, then prepare for the highest expected harm.<n>We propose a methodological framework in three parts: a scenario library, a rating procedure, and a prioritization step.<n>We illustrate the kind of insight the instrument yields and provide a proof of concept for capability-based planning as a practical tool for AI crisis preparedness.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Capability-based planning drives preparedness in defense and homeland security, but has yet to be applied seriously to AI. Government AI preparations follow a predict-then-act paradigm: rank risks by likelihood and impact, then prepare for the highest expected harm. AI resists prediction: expert timelines disagree by orders of magnitude, and official reviews concede that likelihood-based risk assessment fails for exactly this class of risk. Drawing on principles of decision making under deep uncertainty, we propose a methodological framework in three parts: a scenario library sampled systematically across declared axes; a rating procedure that assesses each government capability against each scenario on coarse, gated criteria; and a prioritization step that maps the resulting matrix onto decision rules a government might adopt. Through a pilot across the four most severe AI-enabled threat classes, we illustrate the kind of insight the instrument yields and provide a proof of concept for capability-based planning as a practical tool for AI crisis preparedness.

Related papers

• Toward a Threat Actor Profiling Taxonomy for Pre-Release Risk Management of Open-Weight Frontier Models [2.9794937485335047]
  This capstone argues that explicit adversary characterization should be regarded as a prerequisite for evaluations that are interpretable, comparable, and faithful to the risks they target.<n>We propose a six-attribute taxonomy with empirically grounded tiers derived from existing terrorism, biosecurity, and cybersecurity literature.<n>The taxonomy is designed to function as research infrastructure: a common language for pre-specifying adversary assumptions before evaluations are conducted, analogous to pre-analysis plans for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in medicine and economics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-26T04:34:11Z)
• Provably Secure Agent Guardrail [89.79561918065122]
  Existing defense architectures rely on empirical semantic guardrails and probabilistic large model adjudicators.<n>This paper proposes a new security paradigm for agents based on the fundamental limitations of logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T02:12:41Z)
• Toward Risk Thresholds for AI-Enabled Cyber Threats: Enhancing Decision-Making Under Uncertainty with Bayesian Networks [0.3151064009829256]
  We propose a structured approach to developing and evaluating AI cyber risk thresholds.<n>First, we analyze existing industry cyber thresholds and identify common threshold elements.<n>Second, we propose the use of Bayesian networks as a tool for modeling AI-enabled cyber risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T23:23:12Z)
• Toward Quantitative Modeling of Cybersecurity Risks Due to AI Misuse [50.87630846876635]
  We develop nine detailed cyber risk models.<n>Each model decomposes attacks into steps using the MITRE ATT&CK framework.<n>Individual estimates are aggregated through Monte Carlo simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T17:54:17Z)
• AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
  This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z)
• Governable AI: Provable Safety Under Extreme Threat Models [31.36879992618843]
  We propose a Governable AI (GAI) framework that shifts from traditional internal constraints to externally enforced structural compliance.<n>The GAI framework is composed of a simple yet reliable, fully deterministic, powerful, flexible, and general-purpose rule enforcement module (REM); governance rules; and a governable secure super-platform (GSSP) that offers end-to-end protection against compromise or subversion by AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T04:22:59Z)
• Adapting Probabilistic Risk Assessment for AI [0.0]
  General-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) systems present an urgent risk management challenge.<n>Current methods often rely on selective testing and undocumented assumptions about risk priorities.<n>This paper introduces the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) for AI framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T17:59:14Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• Predictable Artificial Intelligence [77.1127726638209]
  This paper introduces the ideas and challenges of Predictable AI.<n>It explores the ways in which we can anticipate key validity indicators of present and future AI ecosystems.<n>We argue that achieving predictability is crucial for fostering trust, liability, control, alignment and safety of AI ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T21:36:21Z)
• Conformal Decision Theory: Safe Autonomous Decisions from Imperfect Predictions [80.34972679938483]
  We introduce Conformal Decision Theory, a framework for producing safe autonomous decisions despite imperfect machine learning predictions. Decisions produced by our algorithms are safe in the sense that they come with provable statistical guarantees of having low risk. Experiments demonstrate the utility of our approach in robot motion planning around humans, automated stock trading, and robot manufacturing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T17:59:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.