Multi-Tier Mentorship with AI-Assisted Development: Authentic Engineering for K-12 and Undergraduates

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19379v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 18:47:54 GMT
• Title: Multi-Tier Mentorship with AI-Assisted Development: Authentic Engineering for K-12 and Undergraduates
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a multi-tiered mentorship framework enabling high school students to engage in authentic engineering through AI-assisted development.<n>We test this framework through LuckyTag, a privacy-preserving NFC-based lost-and-found system.<n>Thematic analysis reveals that AI amplifies rather than supplants mentoring demands, requiring human oversight for logic and security.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: K-12 students often possess creative engineering ideas but lack technical skills to build them, while undergraduates have coding expertise but few opportunities to lead real-world projects or mentor others. The rapid development of AI-assisted tools offers a potential bridge to connect these groups, yet the structure for effective K-12 and university collaborations remains underexplored. This paper introduces a multi-tiered mentorship framework enabling high school students to engage in authentic engineering through AI-assisted development using large language models and AI agents, while undergraduate mentors provide architectural oversight. We test this framework through LuckyTag, a privacy-preserving NFC-based lost-and-found system. The model positions high schoolers as product leads, undergraduates as technical architects, and faculty as minimal-intervention advisors. A pilot with four high school students, three undergraduates and two faculty yielded survey data showing high perceived barrier removal and gains in system architecture understanding. Thematic analysis reveals that AI amplifies rather than supplants mentoring demands, requiring human oversight for logic and security. These findings suggest a hybrid model for equitable K-12 and university collaboration on computing integration that emphasizes "AI micromanagement" and architectural reasoning over traditional syntax.

Related papers

• Educating the Agentic Engineer: Curricula, Collaboration, and Continuous Learning in the AI Era [0.0]
  Generative and agentic artificial intelligence (AI) are reconfiguring software and systems engineering from a discipline centered on human authorship to one focused on directing, verifying, and governing autonomous systems.<n>This article presents an integrative conceptual synthesis across engineering education, computing education, human-AI interaction, human factors, and the learning sciences to derive an evidence-grounded educational architecture for this archetype.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T16:45:36Z)
• A Preliminary Study on the Impact of AI in the Creativity and Collaboration in Software Teams [7.9711199981607885]
  Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools are reshaping software engineering work, increasingly acting as cognitive partners.<n>This paper examines how software engineering professionals perceive and integrate AI tools focusing on creativity and collaboration within teams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-18T10:07:56Z)
• Reshaping Undergraduate Computer Science Education in the Generative AI Era [85.78707817763434]
  Generative AI represents a turning point for Computer Science (CS) education.<n>To keep pace with advances in AI technology, CS curricula should consider a shift toward understanding and verifying AI-generated artifacts.<n>We believe that to effectively prepare future computer science graduates, capable of creating, solving problems, and managing, as well as co-creating, artifacts with AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T05:26:24Z)
• When Openclaw Agents Learn from Each Other: Insights from Emergent AI Agent Communities for Human-AI Partnership in Education [5.074652081284152]
  AIED envisions AI evolving "from tools to teammates," yet our understanding of AI teammates remains limited to dyadic human-AI interactions.<n>We offer a different vantage point: a rapidly growing ecosystem of AI agent platforms where over 167,000 agents participate, interact as peers, and develop learning behaviors without researcher intervention.<n>We argue that these organic phenomena offer a naturalistic window into dynamics that can inform design of multi-agent educational systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T15:30:36Z)
• The Trilingual Triad Framework: Integrating Design, AI, and Domain Knowledge in No-code AI Smart City Course [19.922097404101496]
  This paper introduces the "Trilingual Triad" framework, a model that explains how students learn to design with generative artificial intelligence (AI)<n>Using a qualitative multi-case study approach, three projects were analyzed across three dimensions: design, AI architecture, and domain expertise.<n>The findings show that effective human-AI collaboration emerges when these three "languages" are orchestrated together.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T10:34:39Z)
• Report for NSF Workshop on AI for Electronic Design Automation [56.48556959103223]
  This report distills the discussions and recommendations from the NSF Workshop on AI for Electronic Design Automation (EDA)<n>Bringing together experts across machine learning and EDA, the workshop examined how AI-spanning large language models (LLMs), graph neural networks (GNNs), reinforcement learning (RL), neurosymbolic methods, etc.<n>The report recommends NSF to foster AI/EDA collaboration, invest in foundational AI for EDA, develop robust data infrastructures, promote scalable compute infrastructure, and invest in workforce development to democratize hardware design and enable next-generation hardware systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T23:45:40Z)
• Engineering.ai: A Platform for Teams of AI Engineers in Computational Design [8.217119500224284]
  We present Engineering.ai, a platform for teams of AI engineers in computational design.<n>The framework employs a hierarchical multi-agent architecture where a Chief Engineer coordinates specialized agents.<n>The system integrates FreeCAD, Gmsh, OpenFOAM, CalculiX, and BPM acoustic analysis, enabling parallel multidisciplinary simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-31T08:00:48Z)
• Evaluation of Architectural Synthesis Using Generative AI [49.1574468325115]
  This paper presents a comparative evaluation of two systems: GPT-4o and Claude 3.5, in the task of architectural 3D synthesis.<n>We conduct a case study on two buildings from Palladio's Four Books of Architecture (1965): Villa Rotonda and Palazzo Porto.<n>We assess the systems' abilities in (1) interpreting 2D and 3D representations of buildings from drawings, (2) encoding the buildings into a CAD software script, and (3) self-improving based on outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T18:39:28Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Creation and Evaluation of a Pre-tertiary Artificial Intelligence (AI) Curriculum [58.86139968005518]
  The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)-Jockey Club AI for the Future Project (AI4Future) co-created an AI curriculum for pre-tertiary education. A team of 14 professors with expertise in engineering and education collaborated with 17 principals and teachers from 6 secondary schools to co-create the curriculum. The co-creation process generated a variety of resources which enhanced the teachers knowledge in AI, as well as fostered teachers autonomy in bringing the subject matter into their classrooms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T11:26:19Z)
• Distributed and Democratized Learning: Philosophy and Research Challenges [80.39805582015133]
  We propose a novel design philosophy called democratized learning (Dem-AI) Inspired by the societal groups of humans, the specialized groups of learning agents in the proposed Dem-AI system are self-organized in a hierarchical structure to collectively perform learning tasks more efficiently. We present a reference design as a guideline to realize future Dem-AI systems, inspired by various interdisciplinary fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-18T08:45:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.