Evaluating Automated Testing on an Open-Source Web Application Using Cypress

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19960v1
• Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 12:28:15 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Automated Testing on an Open-Source Web Application Using Cypress
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the effectiveness of end-to-end automated testing using the Cypress framework for an open-source web application.<n>The test's effectiveness is measured by execution speed, reliability, and maintainability.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: End-to-end automated testing is increasingly used in web software development to ensure system quality and shorten response times during development. However, the true effectiveness of automated testing depends on many factors including execution time, stability of test results, and maintainability of the test suite as the application continues to evolve. In this paper, we evaluate the effectiveness of end-to-end automated testing using the Cypress framework for an open-source web application. We deployed the experiment with 27 test cases. The test's effectiveness is measured by execution speed, reliability, and maintainability. The experimental results show that the Cypress-based end-to-end test suite has short and stable execution times. It suits frequent runs during software development. The majority of test cases achieved consistent results across multiple runs, while flakiness only occurred in a few tests which involve complex interactive functions. Furthermore, the study highlights the impact of element locator strategies and Page Object Model (POM) architecture on test suite maintainability, demonstrating that resilient data-cy attributes significantly reduce maintenance overhead when UI changes occur.

Related papers

• WebTestBench: Evaluating Computer-Use Agents towards End-to-End Automated Web Testing [57.7131457251794]
  We introduce WebTestBench, a benchmark for evaluating end-to-end automated web testing.<n>We decompose the testing process into two cascaded sub-tasks, checklist generation and defect detection, and propose WebTester.<n>Our findings expose a substantial gap between current computer-use agent capabilities and industrial-grade deployment demands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T09:27:29Z)
• The Rise of Agentic Testing: Multi-Agent Systems for Robust Software Quality Assurance [0.0]
  Current AI-based test generators produce invalid, redundant, or non-executable tests due to lack of execution aware feedback.<n>This paper introduces a closed-loop, self-correcting system in which a Test Generation Agent, an Execution and Analysis Agent, and a Review and Optimization Agent collaboratively generate, execute, analyze, and refine tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T18:20:14Z)
• Coverage Isn't Enough: SBFL-Driven Insights into Manually Created vs. Automatically Generated Tests [0.49416305961918044]
  This study compares the SBFL score and code coverage of automatically generated tests with those of manually created tests.<n>Our results show that automatically generated tests achieve higher branch coverage than manually created tests, but their SBFL score is lower, especially for code with deeply nested structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T02:07:31Z)
• AutoPT: How Far Are We from the End2End Automated Web Penetration Testing? [54.65079443902714]
  We introduce AutoPT, an automated penetration testing agent based on the principle of PSM driven by LLMs. Our results show that AutoPT outperforms the baseline framework ReAct on the GPT-4o mini model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T13:24:30Z)
• Do Test and Environmental Complexity Increase Flakiness? An Empirical Study of SAP HANA [47.29324864511411]
  Flaky tests fail seemingly at random without changes to the code. We study characteristics of tests and the test environment that potentially impact test flakiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T07:52:09Z)
• Which Combination of Test Metrics Can Predict Success of a Software Project? A Case Study in a Year-Long Project Course [1.553083901660282]
  Testing plays an important role in securing the success of a software development project. We investigate whether we can quantify the effects various types of testing have on functional suitability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T04:23:51Z)
• A Comprehensive Study on Automated Testing with the Software Lifecycle [0.6144680854063939]
  The research examines how automated testing makes it easier to evaluate software quality, how it saves time as compared to manual testing, and how it differs from each of them in terms of benefits and drawbacks. The process of testing software applications is simplified, customized to certain testing situations, and can be successfully carried out by using automated testing tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T06:30:37Z)
• Taming Timeout Flakiness: An Empirical Study of SAP HANA [47.29324864511411]
  Flaky tests negatively affect regression testing because they result in test failures that are not necessarily caused by code changes. Test timeouts are one contributing factor to such flaky test failures. Test flakiness rate ranges from 49% to 70%, depending on the number of repeated test executions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T20:01:41Z)
• Towards Automatic Generation of Amplified Regression Test Oracles [44.45138073080198]
  We propose a test oracle derivation approach to amplify regression test oracles. The approach monitors the object state during test execution and compares it to the previous version to detect any changes in relation to the SUT's intended behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T12:38:44Z)
• Dynamic Causal Effects Evaluation in A/B Testing with a Reinforcement Learning Framework [68.96770035057716]
  A/B testing is a business strategy to compare a new product with an old one in pharmaceutical, technological, and traditional industries. This paper introduces a reinforcement learning framework for carrying A/B testing in online experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-05T10:25:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.