Applying Anthropic Primitives at Large Enterprises: Harness Paradigm for Knowledge Work

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20622v1
• Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 23:44:52 GMT
• Title: Applying Anthropic Primitives at Large Enterprises: Harness Paradigm for Knowledge Work
• Abstract summary: We propose an architecture that closes the gap between coding tools and governance.<n>One harness runs as the backbone; the code stays identical across every deployment.<n>One artifact runs as a cron backbone, a chat-surface engine, and a terminal tool.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Frontier models have collapsed the cost of writing custom code: a niche problem a specialist sees in their own domain now costs an afternoon. The cost of reviewing and maintaining that code hasn't collapsed. Each solution drifts from the next; understanding one means reading its codebase from scratch. Large enterprises build something centrally governed instead: at worst an off-the-shelf product, at best a graph-orchestration framework wired bespoke per use case, or a low-code platform used as the orchestrator. These are custom every time and limited in scope. Enterprises don't weigh a third option that escapes both constraints: the harness paradigm. Recent work treats the coding-agent harness as enterprise infrastructure rather than a coding tool, converging on three findings: harnesses suffice at the task level and outperform more elaborate architectures on enterprise work (arXiv:2604.00073, arXiv:2604.13107); harness choice accounts for most of the variance in agent benchmark results, more than model choice does (arXiv:2605.23950); and the gap between that finding and enterprise adoption is governance (arXiv:2605.10223, arXiv:2605.18747). We propose an architecture that closes that gap. One harness runs unmodified as the backbone; the code stays identical across every deployment, so reviewing what gets built collapses to reading its instructions file. Section 4 gives four mechanisms: credential-scoped tooling, where each backend gets one generic request tool and a scoped credential instead of a hand-built method; authorization logic outside the harness, so one artifact runs as a cron backbone, a chat-surface engine, and a terminal tool; registration is a side effect of pushing code, collapsing an audit a review of a text file. Built on microcc (<https://pypi.org/project/micro-cc/>), our reference harness.

Related papers

• Dr. Claw: An AI Scientist Workspace for Vibe Research [64.18459471289147]
  Dr. Claw is an open-source workspace that wraps existing coding-agent executors in a controllable human-in-the-loop workflow.<n> Persistent state objects, a reusable skill library, and multi-executor coordination link human decisions to AI execution.<n>Dr. Claw scores higher on research completeness while persisting an auditable, recoverable process trail.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-31T20:58:47Z)
• Rebuild Dossier: Mechanically-Enforced Specs for Agentic App Rebuilds, and What Model-Tier Failures Reveal [0.0]
  rebuild-dossier is an open-source tool that locks an application's real interface before any code is written.<n>It enforces one-test-at-a-time building through automated checks, not written instructions alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-22T01:26:56Z)
• Tencent WorkBuddy Bench: A Multi-Domain Coding-Agent Benchmark with Contamination-Resistant Task Construction [57.138342889101345]
  Tencent WorkBuddy Bench is a multi-domain evaluation suite for coding agents.<n>This report documents its construction methodology, scoring protocol, and a cross-model leaderboard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T04:34:06Z)
• Can Code Specify a System Precisely Enough to Formally Verify It? [0.0]
  This paper evaluates both on production software: the payment workflow of an operational restaurant point-of-sale system.<n>The core protocol is correct relative to a hand-built, line-cited model under a precisely stated failure model.<n>A single probe of the production payment sandbox exposed a response-shape divergence that makes an entire recovery ladder unreachable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-06T13:39:00Z)
• PairCoder++: Pair Programming as a Universal Paradigm for Verified Code-Driven Multimodal and Structured-Artifact Generation [51.92442051257354]
  PairCoder improves essentially every benchmark whose artifact is verifiable, on full official metric suites rather than execution alone.<n>TikZ compile rate up 10 to 30 points on every model, at 2.9 to 9.2 times single model cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-02T08:36:02Z)
• Code as Agent Harness [107.31925305395957]
  In emerging agentic systems, code is no longer only a target output.<n>Code increasingly serves as an operational substrate for agent reasoning, acting, environment modeling, and execution-based verification.<n>This survey provides a unified roadmap toward executable, verifiable, and stateful AI agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T17:59:03Z)
• Theory Under Construction: Orchestrating Language Models for Research Software Where the Specification Evolves [1.0312968200748116]
  Large language models can generate substantial code and draft research text, but research-software projects require more than either artifact alone.<n>We identify two LM-specific failure modes: hallucination accumulation and desynchronization.<n>We propose Comet-H, an iterative prompt that orchestrates ideation, implementation, evaluation, grounding, and paper-writing as coordinates of a single workspace state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T21:28:17Z)
• Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnesses [52.31507076660471]
  We introduce Meta-Harness, an outer-loop system that searches over harness code for large language model (LLM) applications.<n>On online text classification, Meta-Harness improves over a state-of-the-art context management system by 7.7 points while using 4x fewer context tokens.<n>On retrieval-augmented math reasoning, a single discovered harness improves accuracy on 200 IMO-level problems by 4.7 points on average across five held-out models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-30T05:33:50Z)
• Theory of Code Space: Do Code Agents Understand Software Architecture? [0.0]
  Code agents excel at isolated tasks yet struggle with multi-file software engineering requiring architectural understanding.<n>We introduce Theory of Code Space (ToCS), a benchmark that evaluates whether agents can construct, maintain, and update coherent architectural beliefs during AI exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-28T11:40:17Z)
• SwingArena: Competitive Programming Arena for Long-context GitHub Issue Solving [90.32201622392137]
  We present SwingArena, a competitive evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Unlike traditional static benchmarks, SwingArena models the collaborative process of software by pairing LLMs as iterations, who generate patches, and reviewers, who create test cases and verify the patches through continuous integration (CI) pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T18:28:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.