SPARC: Single-Pass Scaling for Motion Forecasting with Conformal Bayesian Last Layers
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20802v1
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 07:20:22 GMT
- Title: SPARC: Single-Pass Scaling for Motion Forecasting with Conformal Bayesian Last Layers
- Abstract summary: Single-Pass Adaptive Risk is a structured, calibrated, and efficient uncertainty estimate for human motion forecasters.<n>A deterministic backbone predicts the future mean, and a conjugate Bayesian last layer converts time-domain feature leverage into an analytic horizon-wise scale.<n>It ranks first on NLL and on the combined MPJPE+NLL criterion while retaining competitive point accuracy and efficient calibrated tubes.
- Score: 1.4452289368758382
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Human motion forecasters are increasingly accurate and fast, but reliable deployment requires uncertainty estimates that are structured, calibrated, and efficient. Bayesian and ensemble-based uncertainty estimates often require repeated stochastic inference [15, 26], while conformal calibration alone does not provide an epistemic signal or preserve trajectory covariance structure [14, 50]. We introduce SPARC (Single-Pass Adaptive Risk Calibration), a Bayesian-conformal uncertainty layer for motion forecasting. A deterministic MLP backbone predicts the future mean, and a conjugate Bayesian last layer converts time-domain feature leverage into an analytic horizon-wise epistemic scale $κ_t(x)$. This scale inflates a graph-temporal Gaussian covariance without changing its correlation structure, and split conformal calibration produces 95% marginal prediction tubes with finite-sample validity under exchangeability. The key interface is the structured factorization $κ_t(x)Σ_{\mathrm{str},t}(x)$, which injects feature-space epistemic uncertainty into trajectory densities without Monte Carlo sampling. Across nine dataset-protocol blocks and deterministic, multimodal, and calibration baselines, SPARC ranks first on NLL and on the combined MPJPE+NLL criterion while retaining competitive point accuracy and efficient calibrated tubes. Ranking windows by $κ$ separates high-error cases, making the scale usable as a lightweight risk monitor.
Related papers
- Adaptive Bregman Proximal Stochastic Gradient with a Stabilized Barzilai--Borwein Step Size [43.46286813814826]
Bregman finite proximal ergo gradient (BPSG) methods bring variance-reduced composite size to objectives whose geometry is poorly captured by Euclidean smoothness.<n>Their performance remains sensitive to stepwise: raw curvature estimates can fluctuate, whereas line searches add repeated searches.<n>We introduce AdaBPSG, a line-search method that combines sparse values and a non-negative matrix factorization rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-12T12:46:05Z) - Conformalized Large Language Models under Configuration Shift [46.502741608809174]
Conformal prediction is a distribution-free framework for uncertainty quantification.<n>Nonconformity scores are often induced by an inference pipeline, not just a fixed model.<n>We show that configuration shift consistently erodes CP validity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-02T19:34:41Z) - Randomized neural operator for parametric PDEs with fast training and conformal uncertainty quantification [47.720075875232226]
We introduce PCA--RaNN, a neural operator that combines a PCA-based dimensionality reduction with fixed random features.<n>It recasts operator learning as fixed regression, reducing latent regression to three orders of magnitude.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-28T15:02:26Z) - Exact Stiefel Optimization for Probabilistic PLS: Closed-Form Updates, Error Bounds, and Calibrated Uncertainty [5.844591976842085]
We develop an end-to-end framework that combines noise pre-estimation, constrained likelihood optimization, and prediction calibration in one pipeline.<n>We extend the framework to sub-Gaussian settings via optional Gaussianization and provide closed-form standard errors through a block-structured Fisher analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T06:38:12Z) - KMM-CP: Practical Conformal Prediction under Covariate Shift via Selective Kernel Mean Matching [19.67518257951341]
Conformal Prediction (CP) provides finite-sample coverage guarantees under exchangeability.<n>We propose KMM-CP, a conformal prediction framework based on Kernel Mean Matching (KMM)<n> Experiments on molecular property prediction benchmarks with realistic distribution shifts show that KMM-CP reduces coverage gap by over 50% compared to existing approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-27T13:44:42Z) - Adaptive Regime-Switching Forecasts with Distribution-Free Uncertainty: Deep Switching State-Space Models Meet Conformal Prediction [38.37518767859008]
We study distribution-free uncertainty for regime-switching forecasting by coupling Deep Switching State Space Models with Adaptive Conformal Inference (ACI) and its aggregated variant (AgACI)<n>We also introduce a unified conformal wrapper that sits atop strong sequence baselines including S4, MC-Dropout GRU, sparse Gaussian processes, and a change-point local model to produce online predictive bands with finite-sample marginal guarantees under nonstationarity and model misspecification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-02T23:21:01Z) - Geometric Calibration and Neutral Zones for Uncertainty-Aware Multi-Class Classification [0.0]
This work bridges information geometry and statistical learning, offering formal guarantees for uncertainty-aware classification in applications requiring rigorous validation.<n> Empirical validation on Adeno-Associated Virus classification demonstrates that the two-stage framework captures 72.5% of errors while deferring 34.5% of samples, reducing automated decision error rates from 16.8% to 6.9%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-26T01:29:49Z) - Unsupervised Conformal Inference: Bootstrapping and Alignment to Control LLM Uncertainty [49.19257648205146]
We propose an unsupervised conformal inference framework for generation.<n>Our gates achieve close-to-nominal coverage and provide tighter, more stable thresholds than split UCP.<n>The result is a label-free, API-compatible gate for test-time filtering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T23:40:47Z) - Post-Hoc Split-Point Self-Consistency Verification for Efficient, Unified Quantification of Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Deep Learning [5.996056764788456]
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is vital for trustworthy deep learning, yet existing methods are either computationally intensive or provide only partial, task-specific estimates.<n>We propose a post-hoc single-forward-pass framework that jointly captures aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty without modifying or retraining pretrained models.<n>Our method applies emphSplit-Point Analysis (SPA) to decompose predictive residuals into upper and lower subsets, computing emphMean Absolute Residuals (MARs) on each side.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-16T17:16:01Z) - BayesTTA: Continual-Temporal Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models via Gaussian Discriminant Analysis [41.09181390655176]
Vision-language models (VLMs) such as CLIP achieve strong zero-shot recognition but degrade significantly under textittemporally evolving distribution shifts common in real-world scenarios.<n>We formalize this practical problem as textitContinual-Temporal Test-Time Adaptation (CT-TTA), where test distributions evolve gradually over time.<n>We propose textitBayesTTA, a Bayesian adaptation framework that enforces temporally consistent predictions and dynamically aligns visual representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-11T14:02:54Z) - Semiparametric conformal prediction [79.6147286161434]
We construct a conformal prediction set accounting for the joint correlation structure of the vector-valued non-conformity scores.<n>We flexibly estimate the joint cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the scores.<n>Our method yields desired coverage and competitive efficiency on a range of real-world regression problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T14:29:02Z) - Efficient and Sharp Off-Policy Evaluation in Robust Markov Decision Processes [44.974100402600165]
We study the evaluation of a policy best-parametric and worst-case perturbations to a decision process (MDP)
We use transition observations from the original MDP, whether they are generated under the same or a different policy.
Our estimator is also estimated statistical inference using Wald confidence intervals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-29T18:11:49Z) - Distribution-free binary classification: prediction sets, confidence
intervals and calibration [106.50279469344937]
We study three notions of uncertainty quantification -- calibration, confidence intervals and prediction sets -- for binary classification in the distribution-free setting.
We derive confidence intervals for binned probabilities for both fixed-width and uniform-mass binning.
As a consequence of our 'tripod' theorems, these confidence intervals for binned probabilities lead to distribution-free calibration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-18T14:17:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.