The Cost of a Physics Prior Is Bounded by the Ablation Gap

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21059v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 13:02:21 GMT
• Title: The Cost of a Physics Prior Is Bounded by the Ablation Gap
• Abstract summary: Shape-constrained and physics-informed learning reports an accuracy cost of enforcing a prior.<n>We show it is mostly a property of the free features and the validation split.<n>We give a two-fit screen that rejects unidentifiable experiments before a constrained model is trained.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Shape-constrained and physics-informed learning reports an accuracy cost of enforcing a prior and treats it as a property of the prior. We show it is mostly a property of the free features and the validation split. Let P be the excess risk of restricting a hypothesis class to functions with a shape constraint on features S, and D the excess risk of the ablated model that ignores S. Because a function constant in x_j is both non-decreasing and non-increasing in x_j, the ablated class is contained in the constrained class, so 0 <= P <= D for every risk functional, with no convexity, smoothness, or realizability assumption. Empirically the bound is a sign test: a constrained model must never be beaten by its own ablation. We instantiate it on an ordinal wildfire-severity task (N = 26,681, K = 3) with hard monotone constraints on four meteorological drivers, coordinates left free, and a validation ladder from i.i.d. resampling to 2-degree spatial blocking. Coordinates act as a shield: alone they recover 92.9% of the full model's macro-F1 under spatial blocking, collapsing D from 0.1288 to 0.0427; the same prior costs 0.0473 shielded and 0.3470 unshielded, a ratio of 7.3 with identical physics. Because D is protocol-dependent it does not transfer: coarsening blocks from 1 to 10 degrees drives D from 0.0942 to 0.0050, leaving two configurations unidentifiable a priori. Inversions of the certified nesting bound the pipeline's additive resolution: over 318 comparisons they give a self-calibrating floor of 0.0220 macro-F1, below which no reported price is interpretable, including four cells in our own headline grid. Cost and compliance are independent: the unconstrained model violates the prior at rate 0.48-0.49 while enforcing it costs 0.0473. We give a two-fit screen that rejects unidentifiable experiments before a constrained model is trained.

Related papers

• Solution for UCF UrbanTwin LUMPI Track: Sim-to-Real Urban LiDAR 3D Object Detection [54.03436243843709]
  We present our solution to the LUMPI track of the UCF UrbanTwin Sim2Real LiDAR Challenge at the 6th DriveX Workshop, ECCV 2026.<n>The detector must be trained only on synthetic data and is evaluated on 50 held-out real LiDAR frames.<n>A separate 50-frame synthetic submission is evaluated for point-cloud realism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-07T15:03:36Z)
• Steering Under Compression: Dose-Response, Capability Cost, and Failure Asymmetry in Quantized LLMs [0.0]
  Inference-time steering enables behavioral control of large language models without parameter modification.<n>Post-training quantization reduces memory and compute costs for deployment.<n>We systematically study activation steering under weight-only quantization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-06T08:41:42Z)
• Feature Priming in Online Linear Regression: Sparse-Regret Lower Bounds and a Tight Univariate Rate [47.36630149538994]
  In high-dimensional online prediction, the best predictor may depend on only a few features, so regret should scale with sparsity rather than the ambient dimension.<n>Warmuth and Amid asked at COLT 2023 whether any of three such rules admits a competitive online regret guarantee.<n>Our analysis identifies a common obstruction: cheap nuisance causes the refit to underweight the truly predictive coordinate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T09:32:03Z)
• WDL-OPD: Weak-Driven On-Policy Distillation via Mixture-Constrained Co-Training [48.290951447286744]
  WDL-OPD is a mixture-constrained co-training method with two trainable policies.<n>An anchor policy generates every rollout, an auxiliary policy evaluates the same visited states, and a geometric mixture of their token distributions is matched to a frozen teacher by reverse KL.<n>We show that freezing the auxiliary recovers an anchor-plus-contrast proxy target closely related to OPD$2$ and W2S-OPD, whereas joint training creates branch-level degrees of freedom that a static delta cannot express.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T11:22:53Z)
• Accurate Ensembles, Fragile Narratives: Multi-Scale Stacking and a Fidelity Audit of LLM-Generated Explanations for Credit Risk [0.0]
  Credit scoring increasingly relies on models whose decision logic cannot be read off their parameters.<n>A common proposal closes that gap with a language model: compute feature attributions, hand them to an LLM, and let it write the rationale.<n>We build such a system end to end and test whether the second half of the promise holds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T13:22:14Z)
• Detecting and Discriminating Operator Misspecification in Hybrid PDE-Parameter Learning: a Reference-Free Instrument, with Discrimination Bounded In Sample [0.0]
  We build an instrument that reads from a single fit and with no oracle.<n>We report where the instrument is blind, a pre-registered negative where a neural estimator loses to Tikhonov-regularized inversion at recovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T21:20:44Z)
• Safety-Gated Agentic Supervisory Control on a Coupled Distillation Benchmark: Regime Map, Auditable Gate, and Co-Design Findings [0.0]
  This paper puts that check in a rule-based forked-twin counterfactual gate.<n>On Skogestad's Column A the ladder is PID-only (C0), linear MPC (C1), ungated agent (C2), and gated agent (C3)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-30T08:26:53Z)
• Level-Crossing Density as a Mesh-Free High-Frequency Auxiliary Loss for Implicit Neural Representations [0.0]
  We derive smooth Monte-Carlo estimators for a continuous neural field using no grid, no complex, no persistence.<n>The estimator is accurate to 1-3% against exact topology in 2D and 3D, and costs about 3 ms per iteration.<n>In 3D neural-SDF fitting, however, a failure mode we believe general to any sampled soft topology objective appears.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T04:23:23Z)
• The Geometry of Forgetting: Temporal Knowledge Drift as an Independent Axis in LLM Representations [50.43168858368539]
  Large language models confidently produce outdated answers, and no existing method can detect them.<n>We show this is not an engineering failure but a structural one: temporal drift is encoded as a direction in the residual stream geometrically to both correctness and uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T22:27:31Z)
• The Extrapolation Cliff in On-Policy Distillation of Near-Deterministic Structured Outputs [52.709361620508595]
  ListOPD brings a student to in-domain with an 8B-SFT baseline at one-fifth the parameters.<n>On Amazon Fashion, three pre-registered tests--a fine-grid cliff interval test, and a small-clip cross-prediction--fall within their locked prediction windows--with the small-clip value matching the closed-form prediction below grid resolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T06:48:00Z)
• Tokens-per-Parameter Coverage Is Critical for Robust LLM Scaling Law Extrapolation [45.56738584872585]
  Neural scaling laws approximate a language model's loss as a power-law function of parameter count $N$ and token count $D$.<n>We show that a collinear design induces an inherent ill-conditioning in the Gauss-Newton least-squares problem.<n>We prove this for four scaling-law formalisms and derive a closed-form TPP-diversity threshold that is necessary and sufficient for well-conditioned estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T23:00:17Z)
• Provably Efficient Model-Free Constrained RL with Linear Function Approximation [4.060731229044571]
  We develop the first model-free, simulator-free algorithm that achieves a sublinear regret and a sublinear constraint violation even in large-scale systems. Our results are achieved via novel adaptations of the standard LSVI-UCB algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-23T17:54:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.