Workplace Surveillance and Insider Threat Risk Management: Legal Limits and Privacy Harms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21205v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 15:20:09 GMT
• Title: Workplace Surveillance and Insider Threat Risk Management: Legal Limits and Privacy Harms
• Abstract summary: This research presents two central arguments on workplace surveillance.<n>Although surveillance serves legitimate organizational purposes, over-surveillance can violate legal requirements and data privacy principles.<n>The paper concludes with recommendations to improve workplace surveillance transparency.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Workplace surveillance is used by organizations to protect corporate assets and monitor employee productivity. This research presents two central arguments on workplace surveillance: although surveillance serves legitimate organizational purposes, over-surveillance can violate legal requirements and data privacy principles; and a primary security objective of workplace surveillance is the detection of insider threats (InT). InT are comprised of individuals with authorized resource access whose intentional or unintentional actions may damage or compromise corporate assets. This paper investigates InT personas to understand behavioral and psychological detection criteria. Employee surveillance tools and techniques are reviewed to characterize the employee surveillance landscape. Workplace privacy laws, examples of over-surveillance, and the resulting privacy harms are addressed. The review identifies research gaps related to over-surveillance, including the generation of excessive alerts that may obscure meaningful InT indicators. The paper concludes with recommendations to improve workplace surveillance transparency, implement InT training programs to improve organizational detection capabilities, and tune InT tools to detect relevant psychological and behavioral indicators.

Related papers

• AI Snitches Get Glitches: Towards Evading Agentic Surveillance [17.665262489915044]
  We introduce and formalize the problem of agentic surveillance: the ability of an AI agent to analyze available information, craft a report, and send it out using available tools.<n>We find that some models exhibit emergent (i.e., unprompted) tendencies to help surveillance, but they also report the attempts to surveil users to repurpose the government.<n>We conclude that agentic surveillance can already be easily implemented and, therefore, call for a comprehensive technical, ethical, and legislative framework to protect users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-24T13:50:22Z)
• Noticing the Watcher: LLM Agents Can Infer CoT Monitoring from Blocking Feedback [48.40096834514452]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is proposed as a method for overseeing the internal reasoning of language-model agents.<n>We ask whether reasoning agents can autonomously infer that their supposedly private CoT is under surveillance.<n>We find that frontier models can deduce the existence of this monitor purely from blocking feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-14T00:12:14Z)
• Agents of Chaos [50.53354213047402]
  We report an exploratory red-teaming study of autonomous language-model-powered agents deployed in a live laboratory environment.<n>Twenty AI researchers interacted with the agents under benign and adversarial conditions.<n>Our findings establish the existence of security-, privacy-, and governance-relevant vulnerabilities in realistic deployment settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T16:28:48Z)
• Detecting Object Tracking Failure via Sequential Hypothesis Testing [80.7891291021747]
  Real-time online object tracking in videos constitutes a core task in computer vision.<n>We propose interpreting object tracking as a sequential hypothesis test, wherein evidence for or against tracking failures is gradually accumulated over time.<n>We propose both supervised and unsupervised variants by leveraging either ground-truth or solely internal tracking information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T14:57:15Z)
• Single-Pixel Vision-Language Model for Intrinsic Privacy-Preserving Behavioral Intelligence [55.512671026669516]
  We propose the Single-Pixel Vision-Language Model (SP-VLM), a novel framework that reimagines secure environmental monitoring.<n>It achieves intrinsic privacy-by-design by capturing human dynamics through inherently low-dimensional single-pixel modalities.<n>We show that SP-VLM can nonetheless extract meaningful behavioral semantics, enabling robust anomaly detection, people counting, and activity understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T09:11:26Z)
• Emergent AI Surveillance: Overlearned Person Re-Identification and Its Mitigation in Law Enforcement Context [2.3124669700253553]
  Generic instance search models can dramatically reduce the manual effort required to analyze vast surveillance footage during criminal investigations by retrieving specific objects of interest to law enforcement.<n>However, our research reveals an unintended emergent capability: through overlearning, these models can single out specific individuals even when trained on datasets without human subjects.<n>This capability raises concerns regarding identification and profiling of individuals based on their personal data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T15:23:16Z)
• Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety [85.79426562762656]
  CoT monitoring is imperfect and allows some misbehavior to go unnoticed.<n>We recommend further research into CoT monitorability and investment in CoT monitoring alongside existing safety methods.<n>Because CoT monitorability may be fragile, we recommend that frontier model developers consider the impact of development decisions on CoT monitorability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T16:43:41Z)
• Beyond Jailbreaking: Auditing Contextual Privacy in LLM Agents [43.303548143175256]
  This study proposes an auditing framework for conversational privacy that quantifies an agent's susceptibility to risks.<n>The proposed Conversational Manipulation for Privacy Leakage (CMPL) framework is designed to stress-test agents that enforce strict privacy directives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T20:47:37Z)
• Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation [56.102976602468615]
  We show that we can monitor a frontier reasoning model, such as OpenAI o3-mini, for reward hacking in agentic coding environments.<n>We find that with too much optimization, agents learn obfuscated reward hacking, hiding their intent within the chain-of-thought.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T23:50:34Z)
• Designing Sousveillance Tools for Gig Workers [10.31597350024712]
  As independently-contracted employees, gig workers disproportionately suffer the consequences of workplace surveillance. Some critical theorists have proposed sousveillance as a potential means of countering such abuses of power. We conducted semi-structured interviews and led co-design activities with gig workers. We identify gig workers' attitudes towards and past experiences with sousveillance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T03:08:26Z)
• Crowd management, crime detection, work monitoring using aiml [0.0]
  This research endeavors to harness the potential of existing CCTV networks for a comprehensive approach to crowd management, crime prevention, and workplace monitoring. The primary objective is to develop and implement advanced algorithms capable of real-time analysis of video feeds. By leveraging AI/ML, the project aims to optimize surveillance capabilities, thereby enhancing public safety measures and improving organizational productivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T14:12:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.